Influences of slab fracturing techniques on long-term performance of rehabilitated PCC pavements

References

• Ambroz, J., and Darter, M, 2005. Rehabilitation of jointed Portland cement concrete pavements: SPS-6 – initial evaluation and analysis. McLean. FHWA Report No. FHWA-RD-01-169.
   Google Scholar
• Bemanian, S., and Sebaaly, P, 1999. Cost-effective rehabilitation of Portland cement concrete pavement in Nevada. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1684, 156–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1684-18
   Google Scholar
• Buncher, M., et al., 2008. Development of guidelines for rubblization. Lexington: Asphalt Institute. Airfield Asphalt Pavement Technology Program Final Report 04-01.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., et al., 2008. Rehabilitation of concrete pavements utilizing rubblization: a mechanistic based approach to HMA overlay thickness design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (1), 45–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430701201260
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., et al., 2018. Non-destructive modulus testing and performance evaluation for asphalt pavement reflective cracking mitigation treatments. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 13 (1), 46–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2018.392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D, 2006. Rubblization – design and construction guidelines on rubblizing and overlaying PCC pavements with hot-mix asphalt. Lanham: National Asphalt Pavement Association Information Series 132.
   Google Scholar
• Dhakal, N., Elseifi, M., and Zhang, Z, 2016. Mitigation strategies for reflection cracking in rehabilitated pavements – a synthesis. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9 (3), 228–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2015a. Office of highway policy information: highway statistics, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2015/hm12.cfm [Accessed 19 July 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2015b. The long-term pavement performance program. Washington. Final Report No. FHWA-HRT-15-049.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, H., et al., 2016. Effectiveness analyses of flexible pavement preventive maintenance treatments with LTPP SPS-3 experiment data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 142 (2), 04015045. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000818
   Google Scholar
• Gu, F., et al., 2015. Estimation of resilient modulus of unbound aggregates using performance-related base course properties. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27 (6), 04014188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, K., Correa, C., and Simpson, A, 2002. LTPP data analysis: effectiveness of maintenance and rehabilitation options. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report Web Document 47. Washington, D.C: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K., Correa, C., and Simpson, A, 2003. Performance of rigid pavement rehabilitation treatments in the long-term pavement performance SPS-6 experiment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1823, 64–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1823-08
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, Z., Chowdhury, N., and Braham, A, 2018. Forensic evaluation of premature pavement failures in Arkansas. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32 (3), 04018023. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., et al., 2019. Numerical analysis of rehabilitated concrete pavement using crack-and-seating technique. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1673389.
   Google Scholar
• Monismith, C., and McLean, D, 1976. Structural design considerations. Journal of the Road Engineering Association, 1 (1), 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Morian, D., et al., 2003. Pennsylvania SPS-6 performance at 10 years: evaluation of concrete pavement rehabilitation strategies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1823, 28–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1823-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucka, P, 2018. Sensitivity of road unevenness indicators to short wavelength distresses in Portland cement concrete surfaces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (10), 901–916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1224409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavement Consultancy Services (PCS), 1994. Guidelines for use of HMA overlays to rehabilitate PCC pavements. National Asphalt Pavement Association Information Series 117. Lanham.
   Google Scholar
• Puccinelli, J., et al., 2013. Performance evaluation of Arizona’s LTPP SPS-6 project: strategic study of rehabilitation techniques. Phoenix. Final Report 396-6.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, A., et al., 2013. Performance prediction models for cracked, seated, and overlaid concrete pavements in California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2368, 92–101. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2368-09
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M., Tran, N., and Copeland, A, 2018. Determining the age and smoothness of asphalt and concrete pavements at the time of first rehabilitation using long-term pavement performance program data. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (40), 176–185. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118792120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M, 1999. Hot mix asphalt overlay design concepts for rubblized Portland cement concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1684, 147–155. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1684-17
   Google Scholar
• Tran, N., et al., 2016. Refined limiting strain criteria and approximate ranges of maximum thickness for designing long-life asphalt pavements. Auburn. NCAT Report 15-05R.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam, T., Dufalla, N., and Pierce, L, 2018. A tale of two pavements: forensic investigation of an unbound concrete overlay and a concrete pavement reconstruction on I-40 near Flagstaff, Arizona. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (40), 264–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118796383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, R., and Timm, D, 2009. Field-based strain thresholds for flexible perpetual pavement design. Auburn. NCAT Report 09-09.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak, M, and Rada, G, 1992. Nationwide evaluation study of asphalt concrete overlays placed on fractured Portland cement concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1374, 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., et al., 2017. Current state of reflective cracking in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143 (3), 04016099. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., Gu, F., and Zhang, Y, 2019. Use of building-related construction and demolition wastes in highway embankment: laboratory and field evaluations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 1051–1060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar