A non-destructive approach for the predictive master curve of ASPHALT pavements using ultrasonic and deflection methods

References

• AASHTO MEPDG, 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: a manual of practice. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 256, 2001. Standard method of test for pavement deflection measurements. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 315-12, 2016. Determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Achenbach, J.D., 1973. Wave propagation in elastic solids. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Apeagyei, A.K., Diefenderfer, B.K., and Diefenderfer, S.D., 2012. Development of dynamic modulus master curves for hot-mix asphalt with abbreviated testing temperatures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13 (2), 98–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2011.566612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM C1383-15, 2015. Standard test method for measuring the P-wave speed and the thickness of concrete plates using the impact-echo method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C597-16, 2016. Standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D2493-16, 2016. Standard practice for viscosity-temperature chart for asphalt binders. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4694-09, 2015. Standard test method for deflections with a falling-weight-type impulse load device. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E2583-07, 2015. Standard test method for measuring deflections with a light weight deflectometer (LWD). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Bari, J., 2005. Development of a new revised version of the Witczak E* predictive models for hot mix asphalt mixtures. Ph.D. thesis. Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bari, J. and Witczak, M.W., 2007. New predictive models for viscosity and complex shear modulus of asphalt binders: for use with mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001 (1), 9–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3141/2001-02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C.L. and Trottier, J.F., 2009. Evaluating high-frequency visco-elastic moduli in asphalt concrete. Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, 20, 116–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09349840802610154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, C.L., and Trottier, J.F., 2010. Evaluating in-service asphalt concrete damage using surface waves. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11 (6), 449–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430903254125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjurström, H., et al., 2016. Field and laboratory stress-wave measurements of asphalt concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 126, 508–516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougan, C.E., et al., 2003. E* - Dynamic modulus: test protocol - problems and solutions. Report No. CT-SPR-0003084-F-03-3. University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, A., 2010. Nondestructive evaluation of asphalt pavement joints using LWD and MASW tests. M.Sc. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering. University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, A., Cascante, G., and Tighe, S., 2010. Combining PFWD and surface wave measurements for evaluation of longitudinal Joints in asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2152 (1), 28–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2152-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2011. LTPP computed parameter: dynamic modulus. (Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-035). Available from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/10035/002.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, G. and Thompson, M., 2007. HMA dynamic modulus predictive models - a review. FHWA-ICT-07-005.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, R.C.G., Hudson, W.R., and Zaniewski, J.P., 1994. Modern pavement management. Malabar, FL: Krieger Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Heisey, J.S., Meyer, A.H., and Stokoe, K.H., 1982. Transportation Research Record 853. Transportation Research Board Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Ashlock, J.C., and Williams, R.C, 2016. Nondestructive quality assessment of asphalt pavements based on dynamic modulus. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 836–847. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LWDmod, 2009. Dynatest International, Glostrup, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Nazarian, S., et al., 2002. Quality management of flexible pavement layers with seismic methods. FHWA/TX-03/0-1735-3.
   Google Scholar
• Nazarian, S., Baker, M.R., and Crain, K., 1993. Development and testing of a seismic pavement analyzer. The University of Texas at El Paso: Centre for Geotechnical and Highway Materials Research, SHRP-H-375.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP 1-28A, 2003. Harmonized test methods for laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP 1-37A, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. National Cooperative Highways Research Program, Project 1-37A, ARA, Inc. and ERES Consultants Division.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Choon B., Miller, Richard D., and Xia, Jianghai, 1999. Multichannel analysis of surface waves. GEOPHYSICS, 64 (3), 800–808. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, M., 2006. SWAN: surface waves analysis. Available from: http://www.geoastier.com.
   Google Scholar
• Ryden, N. and Mooney, M.A., 2009. Analysis of surface waves from the light weight deflectometer. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 1134–1142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinert, B.C., Humphrey, D.N., and Kestler, M.A., 2005. Portable falling weight deflectometer study. NETCR52.
   Google Scholar
• Tighe, S.L., Falls, L.C., and Doré, G., 2007. Pavement performance evaluation of three Canadian low-volume test roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1989-2, 211–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1989-66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullidtz, P., 1987. Pavement analysis. Developments in civil engineering; v. 1. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak, M., El-Basyouny, M., and El-Badawy, S., 2007. Incorporation of the New (2005) E* Predictive model in the MEPDG. NCHRP 1-40D Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Zeiada, W.A., et al., 2014. Improved method of considering air void and asphalt content changes on long-term performance of asphalt concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (8), 718–730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2013.857775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar