Development of alkali activated crushed rock for environmentally sustainable roadway rehabilitation

References

• Abulmatin, A., et al., 2018. Use of eco-friendly cementing materials in concrete made from bottom ash and calcium carbide residue. Arabian Journal of Science and Engineering, 43 (4), 1617–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari, S., Khattak, J. M., and Adhikari, B., 2018. Mechanical characteristics of soil-RAP-geopolymer mixtures for road base and subbase layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (4), 483–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoni, A., et al., 2015. Effect of particle size on properties of sidoarjo mud-based geopolymer. Materials Science Forum, 805, 44–48.
   Google Scholar
• Antoni, A., Wibiatma Wijaya, S., and Hardjito, D., 2016. Factors affecting the setting time of fly ash-based geopolymer. Materials Science Forum, 841, 90–97.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2012a. D1557-12 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3(2,700 kN-m/m3)): ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2012b. D698-12-2 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3): ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2017. D1633 - 17 Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Molded Soil-Cement Cylinders: ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2019. C191 Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle: ASTM International. West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2010. Guide to pavement technology part 2: pavement structural design. Sydney, NSW: Austroads.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2014. Cemented materials characterisation: final report. Sydney, NSW: Austroads.
   Google Scholar
• Boonjaeng, S., Chindaprasirt, P., and Pimraksa, K., 2014. Lime-calcined clay materials with alkaline activation: phase development and reaction transition zone. Applied Clay Science, 95, 357–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS, 2016. EN 196-1:2016 methods of testing cement determination of strength. London, UK: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, S., Kodikara, J. K., and Pardo, L., 2002. Survey results on stabilisation methods and performance of local government roads in Australia. Road & Transport Research, 11 (3), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Chindaprasirt, P., et al., 2009. Comparative study on the characteristics of fly ash and bottom ash geopolymers. Waste Management, 29 (2), 539–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chindaprasirt, P., et al., 2012. Thermal treatment and utilization of Al-rich waste in high calcium fly ash geopolymeric materials. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials, 19 (9), 872–878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chindaprasirt, P., Jenjirapanya, S., and Rattanasak, U, 2014. Characterizations of FBC/PCC fly ash geopolymeric composites. Construction and Building Materials, 66 (1), 72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Chindaprasirt, P., Rattanasak, U., and Taebuanhuad, S., 2013. Resistance to acid and sulfate solutions of microwave-assisted high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Materials and Structures, 46 (3), 375–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J., 1989. Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 35 (2), 429–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J., 1991. Geopolymers. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 37 (8), 1633–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J., 2002. Environmentally driven geopolymer cement applications. The geopolymer 2002 conference, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J., 2018. Why Alkali-Activated Materials (AAM) are NOT Geopolymers? 2018 [cited].
   Google Scholar
• Deventer, J. S. J. v., et al., 2010. Chemical research and climate change as drivers in the commercial adoption of alkali activated materials. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 1 (1), 145–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOH, 1989. DH-S206/1989 Standard of Soil Cement Subbase: Department of Highways. Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• DOH, 2001. DH-S201/2001 Sandard of Crushed Rock Soil Aggregate Type Base: Department of Highways Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• DOH, 2013. DH-S204/2013 Standard of Soil Cement Base: Department of Highway. Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• DTP, 2014. DTP2103-57 Standarf of Crushed Rock Soil Aggregate Type Base: Department of Public Works and Town and Country Planning. Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Eiamwijit, M., et al., 2015. Comparative study on morphology of ground sub-bituminus FBC fly ash geopolymeric material. Advanced Power Technology, 26 (4), 1053–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedrigo, W., et al., 2017. Strength, shrinkage, erodibility and capillary flow characteristics of cement-treated recycled pavement materials. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10, 393–402.
   Google Scholar
• Gavali, H. R., et al., 2019. Development of sustainable alkali-activated bricks using industrial wastes. Construction and Building Materials, 215, 180–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, K. P, 2002. Minimizing cracking in cement-treated materials for improved performance: RD123. Skokie, Illinois. USA: Portland Cement Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gökhan, G. and Gökhan, K., 2014. The influence of the NaOH solution on the properties of the fly ash-based geopolymer mortar cured at different temperatures. Composites Part B: Engineering, 58, 371–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardjito, D., Cheak, C. C., and Ho Lee Ing, C., 2008. Strength and setting times of low calcium fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Modern Applied Science, 8, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hernando, D. and Val, M. A. d., 2016. Guidelines for the design of semi-rigid long-life pavements. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9 (2), 121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, M., et al., 2016. Recycled asphalt pavement - fly ash geopolymers as a sustainable pavement base material: strength and toxic leaching investigations. Science of The Total Environment, 573, 19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, S., et al., 2008. Bonding and abrasion resistance of geopolymeric repair material made with steel slag. Cement & Concrete Composites, 30 (3), 239–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan, Y., et al., 2010. A preliminary study on foamed bitumen stabilisation for Western Australian pavements. Scientific Research and Essays, 5 (23), 3687–3700.
   Google Scholar
• Jitsangiam, P., et al., 2015. Recycled concrete aggregates in roadways: Laboratory examination of self-cementing characteristics. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27 (10), 04014270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jitsangiam, P., et al., 2019. Challenge of adopting relatively low strength and self-cured geopolymer for road construction application: a review and primary laboratory study. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1696967
   Google Scholar
• Li, C., Sun, H., and Li, L., 2010. A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 40 (9), 1341–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liua, Y., et al., 2019. An overview on the reuse of waste glasses in alkali-activated materials. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 144, 297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw, S. and Jones, D., 2015. Pavement recycling: literature review on shrinkage crack mitigation in cement-stabilized pavement layers: technical memorandum (university of California (System). pavement research center). UC Berkeley: University of California Pavement Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Memon, A. F., et al., 2011. Effect of curing conditions on strength of fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 15 (8), 342–345.
   Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Torgala, F., et al., 2012. Durability of alkali-activated binders: A clear advantage over Portland cement or an unproven issue? Construction and Building Materials, 30, 400–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco-Torgal, F., Castro-Gomes, J., and Jalali, S., 2008. Alkali-activated binders: a review. Part 2. About materials and binders manufacture. Construction and Building Materials, 22 (7), 1315–1322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulou, C., et al., 2007. Dissolution of aluminosilicate minerals and by-products in alkaline media. Journal of Materials Science, 42 (9), 2967–2973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. R, 1993. Fundamental Principles of soil compaction. Engineering NewsRecord, 3, 286.
   Google Scholar
• Provis, J. L., Palomo, A., and Shi, C., 2015. Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 78, 110–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanachu, P., et al., 2020. Performance of recycled aggregate concrete with rice husk ash as cement binder. Cement and Concrete Composites, 108, 103533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanasak, U. and Chindaprasirt, P., 2009. Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis os fly ash geopolymer. Mineras Engineering, 22 (12), 1073–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattanashotinunt, C., et al., 2018. Investigation on the strength, chloride migration, and water permeability of eco-friendly concretes from industrial by-product materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1691–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, G. and Agranovski, I. E., 2015. Air emission from the co-combustion of alternative derived fuels within cement plants: Gaseous pollutants. Journal Ofthe Air & Waste Management Association, 65 (2), 186–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Santaquiteria, C., Fernández-Jiménez, A., and Palomo, A., 2016. Alternative prime materials for developing new cements: alkaline activation of alkali aluminosilicate glasses. Ceramics International, 42 (8), 9333–9340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sounthararajah, A., et al., 2018. Early-age fatique damage assessment of cement-treated based under repetitive heavy traffic loading. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (6), 04018079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukmak, P., Horpibulsuk, S., and Shen, S.-L., 2013. Strength development in clay–fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 566–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukprasert, S., et al., 2019. Fly ash based geopolymer stabilisation of silty clay/blast furnace slag for subgrade applications. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (2), 357–371. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2019.1621190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwan, T. and Fan, M, 2014. Influence of OPC replacement and manufacturing procedures on the properties of self-cured geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 551–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwan, T. and Fan, M, 2017. Effect of manufacturing process on the mechanisms and mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer in ambient curing temperature. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 32 (5), 461–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwan, T., Fan, M., and Braimah, N., 2016. Micro-mechanisms and compressive strength of Geopolymer-Portland cementitious system under various curing temperatures. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 180, 219–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teh, S. H., et al., 2017. Hybrid life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from cement, concrete and geopolymer concrete in Australia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 1306–1313.
   Google Scholar
• Wan, Q., et al., 2017. Geopolymerization reaction, microstructure and simulation of metakaolin-based geopolymers at extended Si/Al ratios. Cement and Concrete Composites, 79, 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattanachai, P. and Suwan, T., 2017. Strength of Geopolymer Cement Curing at Ambient Temperature by Non-Oven Curing Approaches: An Overview. The 4th International Conference on Manufacturing and Industrial Technologies, Materials Science and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, H., et al., 2014. Characterization of cementitiously stabilized layers for use in pavement design and analysis (NCHRP report). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Worrell, E., et al., 2001. Carbon dioxide emission from the global cement industry. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 26, 303–329.
   Google Scholar
• Zhanga, S., et al., 2017. Waste glass as partial mineral precursor in alkali-activated slag/fly ash system. Cement and Concrete Research, 102, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar