Investigation into fatigue life of interface bond between asphalt concrete layers

References

• Alae, M., et al., 2020. Effects of layer interface conditions on top-down fatigue cracking of asphalt pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (3), 280–288. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2018.1461870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, 2017a. AASHTO T 378. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT).
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, 2017b. AASHTO T 331. Bulk specific gravity (Gmb) and density of compacted hot mix asphalt (HMA) using automatic vacuum sealing method.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials, 2019. AASHTO TP 133. Provisional standard method of test for determining the damage characteristic curve and failure criterion using small specimens in the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT) cyclic fatigue test.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2013. Mechanical testing of interlayer bonding in asphalt pavements. In: M. Partl, et al., eds. Advances in interlaboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials. RILEM state-of-the-Art Reports, vol 9. Dordrecht: Springer, 303–360.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2018. Advanced interface testing of grids in asphalt pavements. In: M. Partl, et al., eds. Testing and characterisation of sustainable innovative bituminous materials and systems. RILEM state-of-the-Art Reports, vol 24. Cham: Springer, 127–202.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2020. Interlaboratory test to characterise the cyclic behavior of bituminous interlayers: an overview of testing equipment and protocols. RILEM International Symposium on Bituminous Materials, 14-16 December 2020. Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., and Santagata, E, 2005. Temperature effects on the shear behaviour of tack coat emulsions used in flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 6 (1), 39–46. doi: 10.1080/10298430500068720
   Google Scholar
• Chehab, G.R., et al., 2002. Time-temperature superposition principle for asphalt concrete with growing damage in tension state. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 71, 559–593.
   Google Scholar
• Chehab, G.R., O’Quinn, E., and Kim, Y.R, 2000. Specimen geometry study for direct tension test based on mechanical tests and air void variation in asphalt concrete specimens compacted by superpave gyratory compactor. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1723 (1), 125–132. doi: 10.3141/1723-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S.H., 2016. Evaluation of interfacial stress distribution and bond strength between asphalt pavement layers. Thesis (PhD). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S.H., et al., 2017a. A mechanistic approach to evaluate the potential of the debonding distress in asphalt pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (12), 1098–1110. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2016.1149837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S.H., et al., 2019. Evaluation of fatigue cracking performance in a debonded asphalt pavement. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 12 (4), 388–395. doi: 10.1007/s42947-019-0046-8
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S.H., and Kim, Y.R, 2016. Verification of time–temperature superposition principle for shear bond failure of interlayers in asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2590 (1), 18–27. doi: 10.3141/2590-03
   Google Scholar
• Cho, S.H., Safavizadeh, S.A., and Kim, Y.R, 2017b. Verification of the applicability of the time–temperature superposition principle to interface shear stiffness and strength of glasgrid-reinforced asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (4), 766–784. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1189350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., et al., 2012. Toward using tire-road contact stresses in pavement design and analysis. Tire Science and Technology, 40 (4), 246–271. doi: 10.2346/tire.12.400403
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., Fisher, C., and Kannemeyer, L., 2004. Towards the application of stress-in-motion (SIM) results in pavement design and infrastructure protection. 8th international symposium on heavy vehicle weights and dimensions. Muldersdrift, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Diakhaté, M., et al., 2006. Shear fatigue behaviour of tack coats in pavements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 7 (2), 201–222. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2006.9690033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European prestandard, 2013. prEN 12697-48. Bituminous mixtures - test methods for hot mix asphalt. Part 48: interlayer bonding.
   Google Scholar
• European standards, 2013. EN 12697-6. Bituminous mixtures – test methods for hot mix asphalt. Part 6: determination of bulk density of bituminous specimens.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X., and Walubita, L.F, 2011. Effects of layer interfacial bonding conditions on the mechanistic responses in asphalt pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (1), 28–36. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karshenas, A., et al., 2014. Importance of normal confinement to shear bond failure of interface in multilayer asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2456 (1), 170–177. doi: 10.3141/2456-17
   Google Scholar
• Park, S.W., Kim, Y.R., and Schapery, R.A, 1996. A viscoelastic continuum damage model and its application to uniaxial behavior of asphalt concrete. Mechanics of Materials, 24 (4), 241–255. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6636(96)00042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partl, M.N., and Raab, C., 1999. Shear adhesion between top layers of fresh asphalt pavements in Switzerland. 7th conference on asphalt pavements for southern Africa. Victory Falls, Zimbabwe.
   Google Scholar
• Petit, C., et al., 2018. Recommendation of RILEM TC 241-MCD on interface debonding testing in pavements. Materials and Structures, 51, 96. doi: 10.1617/s11527-018-1223-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., Partl, M.N., and Abd El Halim, O., 2009. Evaluation of interlayer shear bond devices for asphalt pavements. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 4 (4), 186–195. doi: 10.3846/1822-427X.2009.4.186-195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, D., et al., 2020a. Shear-torque fatigue performance of geogrid-reinforced asphalt interlayers. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4381. doi: 10.3390/su12114381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, D., et al., 2020b. Analysis of shear-torque fatigue test for bituminous pavement interlayers. Construction and Building Materials, 254, 119309. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, D., et al., 2020c. Use of acoustic techniques to analyse interlayer shear-torque fatigue test in asphalt mixtures. International Journal of Fatigue, 131, 105356. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, D., Graziani, A., and Canestrari, F., 2019. Cyclic interlayer testing in bituminous pavements. 7th international conference bituminous mixtures and pavements, 12-14 June 2019. Thessaloniki, Greece: CRC Press, 207.
   Google Scholar
• Safavizadeh, S.A., and Kim, Y.R, 2017. DIC technique to investigate crack propagation in grid-reinforced asphalt specimens. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (6), 04017011. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapery, R.A., 1962. A simple collocation method for fitting viscoelastic models to experimental data. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, Report No. AF 33(616)-8399.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, M. Y., Kirchner, K., and Blackmon, E., 1987. Analysis of asphalt concrete layer slippage and its effect on pavement performance and rehabilitation design. 6th international conference structural design of asphalt pavements. Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Song, W., et al., 2016. Laboratory investigation of interlayer shear fatigue performance between open-graded friction course and underlying layer. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 381–389. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, K., et al., 2008. Analysis of shear stress in asphalt pavements under actual measured tire-pavement contact pressure. 6th international conference on road and airfield pavement technology, 20-23 July 2008. Sapporo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Sudarsanan, N., Karpurapu, R., and Amrithalingam, V, 2015. State-of-the art summary of geosynthetic interlayer systems for retarding the reflective cracking. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 45 (4), 472–487. doi: 10.1007/s40098-015-0161-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudarsanan, N., Karpurapu, R., and Amrithalingam, V, 2018. An investigation on the interface bond strength of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt concrete using Leutner shear test. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 423–437. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutanto, M.H., 2009. Assessment of bond between asphalt layers. Thesis (PhD). University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J., Livneh, M., and Eshed, Y, 1978. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 47, 495–521.
   Google Scholar
• Wellner, F., and Hristov, B, 2015. Numerically supported experimental determination of the behavior of the interlayer bond in asphalt pavement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2506 (1), 116–125. doi: 10.3141/2506-13
   Google Scholar
• West, R.C., Zhang, J., and Moore, J., 2005. Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT), NCAT Report No. 05-08.
   Google Scholar
• Zofka, A., et al., 2015. Advanced shear tester for evaluation of asphalt concrete under constant normal stiffness conditions. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (sup1), 187–210. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2015.1029690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar