Resilient modulus descriptive analysis and estimation for fine-grained soils using multivariate and machine learning methods

References

• AASHTO, 2008. “Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice,” American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, United States, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Kandari, N. M., and Jolliffe, I. T., 2001. Variable selection and interpretation of covariance principal components. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 30 (2), 339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alwosheel, A., van Cranenburgh, S., and Chorus, C. G., 2018. Is your dataset big enough? sample size requirement when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azam, A. M., Cameron, D. A., and Rahman, M. M., 2013. Model for prediction of resilient modulus incorporating matric suction for recycled unbound granular materials. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50 (11), 1143–1158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banda, T. D., and Kumarasamy, M., 2020. Application of multivariate statistical analysis in the development of a surrogate water quality index (WQI) for South African watersheds. Water, 12, 1584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, L., et al., 2020. A gradient boosting approach to understanding airport runway and taxiway pavement deterioration. International Journal of Pavment Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1714616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beale, R., and Jackson, T., 1990. Neural computing: An introduction. Bristol: Adam Hilger IOP publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Biau, G., Cadre, B., and Rouviere, L., 2019. Accelerated gradient boosting. Machine Learning, 108, 971–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, J. P., Plamondon, C. O., and Dore, G., 2016. Estimation of resilient modulus of unbound granular materials used as pavement base: combined effects of grain size distribution and aggregate source frictional properties. Materials and Structures, 49 (10), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Clereq, D., Wen, Z., and Fei, F., 2019. Determinants of efficiency in anaerobic bio-waste co-digestion facilities: A data envelopment analysis and gradient boosting approach. Applied Energy, 253 (113570), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ekblad, J., 2008. Statistical evaluation of resilient models characterizing coarse granular materials. Materials and Structures, 41 (3), 509–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahani, M. A., and Goli, A., 2018. Effects of aggregate gradation on resilient modulus and CBR in unbound granular materials. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 5 (4), 367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Esmaeili, M., et al., 2014. Multiple regression, ANN and ANFIS models for prediction of backbreak in the open pit blasting. Engineering with Computers, 30, 549–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, Y., 1995. Boosting a weak learning algorithm by majority. Information and Computation, 121, 256–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, Y., Freund, Y., and Shapire, R. E., 1996. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Machine learning: proceedings of the thirteenth international conference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Freund, Y., and Schapire, R. E., 1997. A decision theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55 (1), 119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H., 2001. Greedy Function Approximation: a gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29 (3), 1189–1232.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H., 2002. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 38 (4), 367–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbani, B., et al., 2020. Development of genetic-based models for predicting the resilient modulus of cohesive pavement subgrade soils. Soils and Foundations, 60, 398–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliani, A., 2017. The application of principal component analysis to drug discovery and biomedical data. Drug Discovery Today, 22 (7), 1069–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Armesto, A., et al., 2020. Modelling Hg mobility in podzols: role of soil components and environmental implications. Environmental Pollution, 260, 114040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaydin, O., 2009. Estimation of soil compaction parameters by using statistical analyses and artificial neural networks. Environmental Geology, 57, 203–215.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2004. Guide for mechanistic empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structure: part 2 design inputs: chapter 3 environmental effects. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Hanandeh, S., Ardah, A., and Abu-Farsakh, M., 2020. Using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm to estimate the resilient modulus for stabilized subgrade and propose new empirical formula. Transportation Geotechnics, 24 (100358), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hardle, W. K., and Simar, L., 2015. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J., 2009. The elements of statistical learning. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht-Nielsen, R., 1989. Neurocomputing. Boston, MA: AddisoN-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heidarabadizadeh, N., Ghanizadeh, A. R., and Behnood, A., 2021. Prediction of the resilient modulus of non-cohesive subgrade soils and unbound subbase materials using a hybrid support vector machine method and colliding bodies optimization algorithm. Construction and Building Materials, 275, 122140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotelling, H., 1933. Analysis of complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology, 24 (6), 417–441.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeagwuani, C. C., and Nwonu, D. C., 2019. Resilient modulus of lime-bamboo ash stabilized subgrade soil with different compactive energy. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37, 3557–3565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeagwuani, C. C. and Nwonu, D. C., 2020. Model performance assessment in resilient modulus modelling: a multimodel approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design. doi:10.1080/14680629.2020.1753100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. S. R., 1993. ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, man and Cybernetics, 23 (3), 665–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, J. S. R., Sun, C. T., and Mitzutani, E., 1997. Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. New Delhi, India: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, R., et al., 2014. Evaluation of resilient modulus of subgrade and base materials in Indiana and its implementation in MEPDG. Scientific World Journal. doi:10.1155/2014/372838.
   Google Scholar
• Jibon, M., Mishra, D., and Kassem, E., 2020. Laboratory characterisation of fine-grained soils for pavement ME design implementation in Idaho. Transportation Geotechnics, 25, 100395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T., 2002. Rotation and interpretation of principal components. In: Principal component analysis. Springer series in StatisticsNew York: Springer, pp. 269–298.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T., and Cadima, J., 2016. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Phil Trans R Soc A, 374, 20150202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaloop, M. R., et al., 2019. Particle swarm optimization algorithm-extreme learning machine (PSO-ELM) model for predicting resilient modulus of stabilized aggregate bases. Applied Sciences, 9, 3221.
   Google Scholar
• Khasawneh, M. A., and Al-jamal, N. F., 2019. Modeling resilient modulus of fine-grained materials using different statistical techniques. Transportation Geotechnics, 21, 100263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, K., and Altun, G., 2020. Is support vector regression method suitable for predicting rate of penetration? Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 194, 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y. L., et al., 2009. ANN-based model for predicting the bearing capacity of strip footing on multi-layered cohesive soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 36 (3), 503–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lekarp, F., Isacsson, U., and Dawson, A., 2000. State of the art. I: Resilient response of unbound aggregates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126, 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., and Selig, E. T., 1994. Resilient modulus for fine-grained subgrade soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120 (6), 939–957.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., et al., 2016. Multivariate correlation among resilient modulus and cone penetration test parameters of cohesive subgrade soils. Engineering Geology, 209, 128–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LTPP, 1996. Resilient modulus of unbound granular base/subbase materials and subgrade soils. FHWA: U.S. Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• LTPP, 2001 “Guide to LTPP traffic data collection and processing,” U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, McLean, Virginia, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• LTPP, 2018 “Long-term Pavement Performance IMS package [Dataset],” Long-term Pavement Performance, 2018. [Online]. https://infopave.fhwa.dot.govt/DownloadTracker/Bucket/23228.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, W. S., and Pitts, W., 1943. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 5, 115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Mousa, E., El-Badawy, S., and Azam, A., 2020. Evaluation of reclaimed asphalt pavement as base/subbase material in Egypt. Transportation Geotechnics, 100414. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. H., Gabr, M. A., and Borden, R. H., 2016. Subgrade resilient modulus prediction from light weight deflectometer. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54 (3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. H., Gabr, M. A., and Borden, R. H., 2018. Resilient modulus prediction of soft low-plasticity Piedmont residual soil using dynamic cone penetrometer. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 10 (2), 323–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, V. S., 2002. Principles and practices of soil mechanics and foundation engineering. New York: Marcek Decker INC.
   Google Scholar
• Nnaji, C. C., and Agunwamba, J. C., 2013. The environmental impact of crude oil formation water: a multivariate approach. Journal of Water Chemistry and Technology, 35 (5), 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nnaji, C. C. and Nnam, J. P., 2019. Assessment of potability of stored rainwater and impact of environmental conditions on its quality. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16, 8471–8484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwonu, D. C., and Ikeagwuani, C. C., 2019. Evaluating the effect of agro-based admixture on lime-treated expansive soil for subgrade material. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–16. doi:10.1080/10298436.2019.1703979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oskooei, P. R., et al., 2020. Application of artificial neural network models for predicting the resilient modulus of recycled aggregates. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1791863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, K., 1901. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Phil Mag, 2, 559–572.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, C., et al., 2017. Multi-site solar power forecasting using gradient boosted regression. Solar Energy, 150, 423–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranasinghe, R. A. T. M., et al., 2017. Application of artificial neural networks for predicting the impact of rolling dynamic compaction using dynamic cone penetrometer test results. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9 (2), 340–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, T., 2016. Make your own neural network: A gentle journey through the mathematics of neural networks, and making your own using python computer language. North Charleston, SC: Createspace independent publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings, J. O., Pantula, S. G., and Dickey, D. A., 1998. Applied regression analysis: A research tool. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ruttanaporamakul, P., 2012. Resilient moduli properties of compacted unsaturated subgrade materials. Arlington: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Schapire, R. E., 1990. The strength of weak learnability. Machine Learning, 5, 197–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solanki, P., Zaman, M. M., and Dean, J., 2010. Resilient modulus of clay subgrades stabilized with lime, class C fly ash, and cement kiln dust for pavement design. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2186, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Y., et al., 2021. Effect of water content on resilient modulus and damping ratio of fine/coarse soil mixtures with varying coarse grain contents. Transportation Geotechnics, 26, 100452. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi, T., and Sugeno, M., 1985. Fuzzy identification of systems and its application to modeling and control. IEE Transactions on Systems, man and Cybernetics, 5 (1), 116–132.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R., 1990. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. Journal of Medical Sonography, 1, 35–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titi, H. H., and Matar, M. G., 2018. Estimating resilient modulus of base aggregates for mechanistic-empirical pavement design and performance evaluation. Transportation Geotechnics, 17, 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutumluer, E., 2013. Practices for unbound aggregate pavement layers. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Tutumluer, E., Mishra, D., and Butt, A., 2009. “Characterization of Illinois aggregates for subgrade replacement and subbase,” University of Illinois, Urbana-Champagne, Illinois, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zhalehjoo, N., et al., 2018. The effect of instrumentation on the determination of the resilient modulus of unbound granular materials using advanced repeated load triaxial testing. Transportation Geotechnics, 14, 190–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2020a. Back-calculation of elastic modulus of high liquid limit clay subgrades based on viscoelastic theory and multipopulation genetic algorithm. International Journal of Geomechanics, 20 (10), 04020194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., et al., 2020b. Analysis of critical factors to asphalt overlay performance using gradient boosted models. Construction and Building Materials, 263 (120083), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., Pak, R. Y., and Zhang, J.2021. Vertical time-harmonic coupling vibration of an impermeable, rigid, circular plate resting on a finite, poroelastic soil layer. Acta Geotechnica, 16, 911–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar