Assessment of aircraft landing gear cumulative stroke to develop a new runway roughness evaluation index

References

• APR Consultants, Inc, 2002. APRas-RRR. CD-ROM, version 1.2.4. Ohio: APR Consultants, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• The Boeing Company, 2019. 737 MAX airplane characteristics for airport planning, Technical Report D6-38A004. Boeing Commercial Airplanes.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. and Chou, C., 2004. Assessment of aircraft's vertical responses to develop the roughness evaluation index for airport pavement. In: Proceedings of the 2004 FAA Worldwide airport technology transfer conference, Atlantic City, NJ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Z.M., Ling, J.M., and Zhou, D., 2013. Numerical expression of dynamic load generated by aircraft at varying international roughness index and velocities. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Record.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, S., Hefer, A., and Horak, E., 2015. Roughness of runways and significance of appropriate specifications and measurement. Presented at 11th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa, 16–19 August.South Africa: Sun City.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration, 2004. ProFAA: The Federal Aviation Administration computer program for roughness index analyses: user’s manual. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Aviation Administration, 2015. Surface roughness study final data report Boeing 737-800 [M]. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Gerardi, M., n.d. The Boeing Bump Index – Additional Methodologies Recommended. https://www.aprconsultants.com/articles/.
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, E.L., 1991. Runway roughness measurement, quantification and application: The Boeing approach . Proc., Aircraft/Pavement Interaction, New York. 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Kosar, K., Durmaz, S., and Jafarov, E.M., 2007. Longitudinal dynamics analysis of Boeing 747-400. In: Proceedings of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Automatic Control, Modeling & Simulation, Istanbul, Turkey, 82–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, J.-M., et al., 2017. Comprehensive analysis of the roughness evaluation of airport pavement and road surface with different roughness excitation [J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 45 (4), 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, J.-M., et al., 2018. Application limitation of Boeing Bump to evaluation of runway roughness [J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 46 (8), 1035–1041.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, J.M., Liu, S.F., and Yuan, J., 2017. Applicability of IRI based evaluation of airport pavement roughness [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 17 (01), 20–27.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., et al., 2018. Landing Gear Cumulative Stroke-Based Runway Roughness Evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board,Washington, DC, USA. 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S.F. and Ling, J.M., 2017. Evaluation and IRI criteria inversion of airport pavement roughness based on vertical acceleration response [J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 34 (5), 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Loprencipe, G. and Zoccali, P., 2017. Comparison of methods for evaluating airport pavement roughness [J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, W., et al., 2018. Evaluation of opportunities for connected aircraft data to identify pavement roughness at airports [J]. The Collegiate Aviation Review International, 36 (2), 6–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and Queiroz, C.A.V., 1986. The international road roughness experiment: establishing correlation and calibration standard for measurements. Washington, D.C., U.S.A. : World Bank Technical Paper .
   Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, S. and Haran, A.P., 2015. Mathematical model and vibration analysis of aircraft with active landing gears [J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 21 (2), 229–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley, R.F. and Horne, W.B., 1960. Mechanical properties of pneumatic tires with special reference to modern aircraft tires. Langley Field VA: Langley Aeronautical Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gelder, P. and Stet, M., 2009. Evaluation methods for longitudinal evenness of runway pavements [J]. Technology Representative, 33 (1), 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, J.E., 2008. A study of airport pavement-aircraft interaction using wavelet analysis [D]. TX: The University of Texas at San Antonio.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, L.G., Chen, J.J., and Yuan, J., 2016. Taxiing load analysis of aircrafts based on virtual prototype [J]. Tongji University: Natural Science, 44 (12), 1873–1879.
   Google Scholar