An ensemble learning model for asphalt pavement performance prediction based on gradient boosting decision tree

References

• Abd El-Hakim, R and El-Badawy, S., 2013. International roughness index prediction for rigid pavements: An artificial neural network application. Advanced Materials Research, 723, 854–860.
   Google Scholar
• Abdelaziz, N., et al., 2018. International roughness index prediction model for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (1), 88–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attoh-Okine, N. O., 1994. Predicting roughness progression in flexible pavements using artificial neural networks. 3rd International Conference on Managing Pavements, 1 (1), 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, L., et al., 2020. A gradient boosting approach to understanding airport runway and taxiway pavement deterioration. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1714616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, G.H., Polyzois, D., and Cha, Y.J, 2019. Deep learning-based automatic volumetric damage quantification using depth camera. Automation in Construction, 99, 114–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentéjac, C., Csörgo, A., and Martínez-Muñoz, G., 2021. A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1937–1967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosurgi, G., Pellegrino, O., and Sollazzo, G, 2019. Optimizing artificial neural networks for the evaluation of asphalt pavement structural performance. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 14 (1), 58–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo-Moncayo, L., et al., 2019. A machine learning approach for traffic-noise annoyance assessment. Applied Acoustics, 156, 262–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Neto, M., et al., 2009. AADT prediction using support vector regression with data-dependent parameters. Expert Systems with Applications, 36 (2 PART 2), 2979–2986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., Bayrak, M.B., and Gopalakrishnan, K, 2014. Neural networks applications in pavement engineering: A recent survey. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 7 (6), 434–444.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, T., et al., 2020. Pavement crack detection and recognition using the architecture of segNet. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 18 (March), 100144.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. and Do, M, 2019. Development of the road pavement deterioration model based on the deep learning method. Electronics (Switzerland), 9 (1):3, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9010003.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, X., et al., 2020. Evaluation of the rutting performance of the field specimen using the hamburg wheel-tracking test and Dynamic Modulus test. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9525179.
   Google Scholar
• Elmousalami, H.H, 2019. Artificial intelligence and parametric construction cost estimate modeling: state-of-The-Art review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146 (1), https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001678.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA, 2003. Long-term pavement performance information management system pavement performance database user reference guide. Security, 088 (May).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H, 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29 (5), 1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., 2006. The handbook engineering of highway. Boca Raton,FL: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, H., et al., 2018a. Improving accuracy of rutting prediction for mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide with deep neural networks. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 710–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., et al., 2018b. Use of random forests regression for predicting IRI of asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 189, 890–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., Sun, Y, and Huang, B, 2019. Gradient Boosted Models for Enhancing Fatigue Cracking Prediction in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide Backgrounds of Fatigue Cracking Transfer. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part B-Pavements, 145 (2), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, N.D, 2019. Image processing based automatic recognition of asphalt pavement patch using a metaheuristic optimized machine learning approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 40 (April), 110–120.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F., and Prozzi, J.A, 2010. Roughness model accounting for heterogeneity based on in-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (3), 205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., Gopisetti, L.S.P., and Miah, M.S, 2020. Artificial neural network modelling to predict international roughness index of rigid pavements. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 13 (3), 229–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, N., Singh, D., and Zaman, M., 2013. Dynamic modulus-based field but prediction model from an instrumented pavement section. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Hussan, S., et al., 2020. Modelling asphalt pavement analyzer rut depth using different statistical techniques. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (1), 117–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju, Y., et al., 2019. A model combining convolutional neural network and lightgbm algorithm for ultra-short-term wind power forecasting. IEEE Access, 7 (c), 28309–28318.
   Google Scholar
• Kaloop, M.R., et al., 2020. A hybrid wavelet-optimally-pruned extreme learning machine model for the estimation of international roughness index of rigid pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1776281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, D., and Pulugurta, H., 2007. Fuzzy decision tree based approach to predict the type of pavement repair. 7th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Informatics and Communications, (January 2007), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ke, G., etal, 2017. LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017) ,Long Beach, CA, USA ,3147–3155.
   Google Scholar
• Kirbaş, U., and Karaşahin, M, 2016. Performance models for hot mix asphalt pavements in urban roads. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., et al., 2017. Effective temperature for predicting permanent deformation of asphalt pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 156, 871–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.D., et al., 2013. Using decision tree for data mining of pavement maintenance and management. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 330, 1015–1019.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, S.M., and Lee, S.I, 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4766–4775.
   Google Scholar
• Majidifard, H., Adu-Gyamfi, Y., and Buttlar, W.G, 2020. Deep machine learning approach to develop a new asphalt pavement condition index. Construction and Building Materials, 247, 118513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcelino, P., et al., 2019. Machine learning approach for pavement performance prediction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2019.1609673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcelino, P., et al., 2020. Transfer learning for pavement performance prediction. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 13 (2), 154–167.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T., and Choummanivong, L, 2016. The benefits of long-term pavement performance (LTPP) research to funders. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2477–2486.
   Google Scholar
• Mazari, M., and Rodriguez, D.D, 2016. Prediction of pavement roughness using a hybrid gene expression programming-neural network technique. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 3 (5), 448–455.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, Q., and Gül, M, 2020. A cost effective solution for pavement crack inspection using cameras and deep neural networks. Construction and Building Materials, 256, 119397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mombeini, H., and Yazdani-Chamzini, A, 2015. Modeling gold price via artificial neural network. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3 (7), 699–703.
   Google Scholar
• Nhat-Duc, H., Nguyen, Q.L., and Tran, V.D, 2018. Automatic recognition of asphalt pavement cracks using metaheuristic optimized edge detection algorithms and convolution neural network. Automation in Construction, 94 (June), 203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Parsa, A.B., et al., 2020. Toward safer highways, application of XGBoost and SHAP for real-time accident detection and feature analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 136, 105405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei, L., et al., 2020. Pavement aggregate shape classification based on extreme gradient boosting. Construction and Building Materials, 256, 119356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schram, S., and Abdelrahman, M, 2006. Improving prediction accuracy in mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record, 1947, 59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, S., et al., 2016. A statistical based framework for predicting field cracking performance of asphalt pavements: application to top-down cracking prediction. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 226–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidess, A., Ravina, A., and Oged, E, 2020. A model for predicting the deterioration of the international roughness index. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1804062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollazzo, G., Fwa, T.F., and Bosurgi, G, 2017. An ANN model to correlate roughness and structural performance in asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 134, 684–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titus-Glover, L., Darter, M.I., and Quintus, H. Von, 2019. Impact of environmental factors on pavement performance in the absence of heavy loads. Technical Report FHWA-HRT-16-084 Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Truong, V.H., et al., 2020. A robust method for safety evaluation of steel trusses using gradient tree boosting algorithm. Advances in Engineering Software, 147 (March), 102825.
   Google Scholar
• Tümen, V., and Ergen, B, 2020. Intersections and crosswalk detection using deep learning and image processing techniques. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 543, 123510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatani Nezafat, R., Sahin, O., and Cetin, M., 2019. Transfer learning using deep neural networks for classification of truck body types based on side-fire lidar data. Journal of Big Data Analytics in Transportation, 1 (1), 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2020. A hybrid model for prediction in asphalt pavement performance based on support vector machine and grey relation analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7534970.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., et al., 2017. Sensitivity of flexible pavement design to michigan’s climatic inputs using pavement ME design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (7), 622–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G., et al., 2018. Convolutional neural network-based friction model using pavement texture data. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32 (6), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeiada, W., et al., 2020. Machine learning for pavement performance Modelling in warm climate regions. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45 (5), 4091–4109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., et al., 2017. Prediction on rutting decay curves for asphalt pavement based on the pavement-ME and matter element analysis. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10 (6), 466–475.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., et al., 2020a. Analysis of critical factors to asphalt overlay performance using gradient boosted models. Construction and Building Materials, 262, 120083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., et al., 2020b. Short-term passenger flow forecast of rail transit station based on MIC feature selection and ST-LightGBM considering transfer passenger flow. Scientific Programming, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7534970.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z., et al., 2017. LSTM network: a deep learning approach for short-term traffic forecast. IET Image Processing, 11 (1), 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z.-H., 2012. Ensemble methods foundations and algorithms. Boca Raton, FL : Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Ziari, H., et al., 2015. Prediction of IRI in short and long terms for flexible pavements: ANN and GMDH methods. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (9), 776–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar