536
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Performance of granular road base and sub-base layers containing recycled concrete aggregate in different ratios

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 3729-3742 | Received 19 Aug 2020, Accepted 09 Apr 2021, Published online: 19 Apr 2021

References

  • AASHTO, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
  • AASHTO M 145-91, 2004. Classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
  • AASHTO M 147-65, 2012. Materials for aggregate and soil-aggregate subbase, base, and surface courses. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
  • AASHTO T224, 2004. Correction for coarse particles in the soil compaction test. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
  • AASHTO T 307-99, 2012. Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
  • Akhtar, A. and Sarmah, A. K, 2018. Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: a global perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 262–281.
  • Arshad, M. and Ahmed, M. F, 2017. Potential use of reclaimed asphalt pavement and recycled concrete aggregate in base/subbase layers of flexible pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 83–97.
  • Arulrajah, A., et al., 2012. Geotechnical properties of recycled concrete aggregate in pavement sub-base applications. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35 (5), 743–751.
  • Arulrajah, A., et al., 2013. Resilient moduli response of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (12), 1920–1928.
  • ASTM C127, 2015. Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM C128, 2015. Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of fine aggregate. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM C131, 2014. Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM C88, 2013. Standard test method for soundness of aggregates by use of sodium sulfate or magnesium sulfate. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D1557, 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D1883, 2016. Standard test method for california bearing ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D2434, 2006. Standard test method for permeability of granular soils. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D2487, 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D4318, 2017. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D4718, 2015. Correction of unit weight and water content for soils containing oversize particles. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • ASTM D5856, 2015. Standard test method for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of porous material using a rigid-wall, compaction-mold permeameter. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
  • Ayan, V., et al., 2014. Compaction assessment of recycled aggregates for use in unbound subbase application. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 20 (2), 169–174.
  • Barbudo, A., et al., 2012. Statistical analysis of recycled aggregates derived from different sources for sub-base applications. Construction and Building Materials, 28 (1), 129–138.
  • Bennert, T., et al., 2000. Utilization of construction and demolition debris under traffic-type loading in base and subbase applications. Transportation Research Record, 1714, 33–39.
  • Bestgen, J. O., et al., 2016. Mechanical and environmental suitability of recycled concrete aggregate as a highway base material. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (9), 04016067.
  • BS EN 8500-2, 2006. Concrete—complementary British Standard to BS EN 206-1-part 1: method of specifying and guidance for the specifier. Londra, England: British Standard Institution.
  • Cardoso, R., et al., 2016. Use of recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste in geotechnical applications: A literature review. Waste Management, 49, 131–145.
  • Donalson, J., Curtis, R., and Najafi, F., 2011. Sustainable assessment of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) used in highway construction. Proceedings of the 90st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. 23-27 January 2011 Washington, D.C. USA: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Freedonia, 2016. World construction aggregates. Cleveland, OH: The Freedonia Group. Industry Study No 3389.
  • Gabr, A. R. and Cameron, D. A, 2012. Properties of recycled concrete aggregate for unbound pavement construction. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (6), 754–764.
  • Haider, I., et al., 2014. Evaluation of the mechanical performance of recycled concrete aggregates used in highway base layers. In: M. Abu-Farsakh, X. Yu and L. R. Hoyos eds. Geo-Congress 2014: Geo-characterization and modeling for sustainability. 23–26 February 2014. Atlanta, GA: ASCE, 3686–3694.
  • Heukelom, W. and Klomp, A., 1962. Dynamic testing as a means of controlling pavements during and after construction. In: 1st International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements. 20-24 August 1962. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 667–679.
  • Jimenez, J. R., et al., 2011. A comparative study of recycled aggregates from concrete and mixed debris as material for unbound road sub-base. Materiales De Construccion, 61 (302), 289–302.
  • Jitsangiam, P., et al., 2015. Recycled concrete aggregates in roadways: laboratory examination of self-cementing characteristics. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27 (10), 04014270.
  • Kazmee, H., Tutumluer, E., and Mishra, D., 2012. Effects of material blending on strength, modulus and deformation characteristics of recycled concrete aggregates. Proceedings of the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board. 22-26 January 2012 Washington, D.C. USA: National Academy of Sciences.
  • Kuosa, H, 2012. Reuse of recycled aggregates and other C&D wastes. Espoo: VIT Technical Research Centre.
  • Mishra, D., and Tutumluer, E, 2012. Aggregate physical properties affecting modulus and deformation characteristics of unsurfaced pavements. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (9), 1144–1152.
  • Molenaar, A. A. and van Niekerk, A. A., 2002. Effects of gradation, composition, and degree of compaction on the mechanical characteristics of recycled unbound materials. Transportation Research Record, 1787 (1), 73–82.
  • Molin, C., Larsson, K. and Arvidsson, H., 2004. Quality of reused crushed concrete strength, contamination and crushing technique. In: E. Vázquez, C. F. Hendriks and G. M. T. Janssen eds. International RILEM conference on the use of recycled materials in buildings and structures. 8–11 November 2004. Barcelona: RILEM Publications, 150–155.
  • Mroueh, U. M., Eskola, P., and Laine-Ylijoki, J., 2001. Life-cycle impacts of the use of industrial by-products in road and earth construction. Waste Management, 21 (3), 271–277.
  • NCHRP 1-37A, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Washington D.C.: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
  • Nokkaew, K., Tinjum, J. M. and Benson, C. H., 2012. Hydraulic properties of recycled asphalt pavement and recycled concrete aggregate. In: K. Rollins and D. Zekkos eds. Geocongress 2012: state of the Art and practice in geotechnical engineering. 25-29 March 2012. Oakland, CA: ASCE, 1476–1485.
  • Poon, C. S. and Chan, D. X, 2006. Feasible use of recycled concrete aggregates and crushed clay brick as unbound road sub-base. Construction and Building Materials, 20 (8), 578–585.
  • Poon, C. S., Qiao, X. C., and Chan, D. X, 2006. The cause and influence of self-cementing properties of fine recycled concrete aggregates on the properties of unbound sub-base. Waste Management, 26 (10), 1166–1172.
  • Shi, X., et al., 2019. Economic input-output life cycle assessment of concrete pavement containing recycled concrete aggregate. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 414–425.
  • Sweere, G. T. H., 1990. Unbound granular bases for roads. Thesis (PhD). University of Delft.
  • Thompson, M. and Robnett, Q., 1976. Final report-Resilient properties of subgrade soils. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. FHWA-IL-UI-160.
  • Toka, E. B., 2019. Experimental investigation of the usability of recycled concrete aggregate in road superstructure (in Turkish). Thesis (M.Sc.). Konya Technical University.
  • TS EN 933-3, 2012. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates - part 3: determination of particle shape - Flakiness index (in Turkish). Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Standards Institute.
  • Tutumluer, E. and Pan, T, 2008. Aggregate morphology affecting strength and permanent deformation behavior of unbound granular materials. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 20 (9), 617–627.
  • US EPA, 2019. Advancing sustainable materials management: 2017 fact sheet.
  • Uzan, J, 1985. Characterization of granular material. Transportation Research Record, 1022 (1), 52–59.
  • Vega Araujo, D., Martinez-Arguelles, G., and Santos, J., 2020b. Comparative life cycle assessment of warm mix asphalt with recycled concrete aggregates: A Colombian case study. Procedia CIRP, 90, 285–290.
  • Vega Araujo, D. L., Santos, J., and Martinez-Arguelles, G., 2020a. Life cycle assessment of hot mix asphalt with recycled concrete aggregates for road pavements construction. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1778694.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.