An assessment of lime-cement stabilisation on the elastic and resilient moduli of a clayey soil

References

• AASHTO, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2007. Determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials T 307–99. Washington, D.C: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Addison, MB, and Polma, FA, 2007. Extending durability of lime modified clay subgrades with cement stabilization Geo-Denver 2007 February 18–21, 2007 Denver, Colorado, United States ASCE 2007. 1–10..
   Google Scholar
• Akula, P, et al., 2020. Evaluating the long-term durability of lime treatment in hydraulic structures: case study on the friant-kern canal. Transportation Research Record, 2674 (6), 431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mukhtar, M, Khattab, S, and Alcover, J-F, 2012. Microstructure and geotechnical properties of lime-treated expansive clayey soil. Engineering Geology, 139, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rawas, AA, and Goosen, MF, 2006. Expansive soils: recent advances in characterization and treatment. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 371–384.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, B., 2006. Guide to pavement technology: part 4D: stabilised materials (No. AGPT04D/06).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, B., and Vorobieff, G., 2009. Guide to pavement technology: part 4L: stabilising binders (No. AGPT4L/09).
   Google Scholar
• AS, 2001. Method 1.1: Sampling and preparation of soils— Preparation of disturbed soil samples for testing. AS 1289.1.1, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• AS, 2008. Methods for preparation and testing of stabilized materials - Unconfined compressive strength of compacted materials. AS 5101.4, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• AS, 2014. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes-Method 6.1.1: Soil strength and consolidation tests—Determination of the California Bearing Ratio of a soil—Standard laboratory method for a remoulded specimen. AS 1289.6.1.1, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• AS, 2016. Supplementary cementitious materials, Part 2: Slag—Ground granulated blastfurnace,. AS 3582.2, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• AS, 2017. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes-Method 5.1.1: Soil compaction and density tests—Determination of the dry density/moisture content relation of a soil using standard compactive effort. AS 1289.5.1.1, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Asgari, M, Dezfuli, AB, and Bayat, M, 2015. Experimental study on stabilization of a low plasticity clayey soil with cement/lime. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 8 (3), 1439–1452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AustStab, 2012. AustStab Technical Note 5, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Aytekin, M, and Evin, N, 1998. Soil stabilization with lime and cement. Teknic Dergi, 9 (1), 471–477.
   Google Scholar
• Bello, A, 2011. ‘Influence of compaction delay on CBR and UCS of cement stabilized lateritic soil’.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharja, S, and Bhatty, J, 2003. Comparative performance of portland cement and lime stabilization of moderate to high plasticity clay soils. Portl. Cem. Assoc, 2066, 60–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bhengu, P, and Allopi, D, 2016. Review on the lime-soil stabilization as one of the successful technologies used in the improvement of road-soil-pavement layers strength 35th Southern African Transport Conference. 4–7 July 2016, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Bozbey, I, and Garaisayev, S, 2010. Effects of soil pulverization quality on lime stabilization of an expansive clay. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60 (6), 1137–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S, Lashine, A, and Hyde, A, 1975. Repeated load triaxial testing of a silty clay. Geotechnique, 25 (1), 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Transport and Main Roads, Q, 2019. MRTS07A, Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Güneyli, H, and Rüşen, T, 2016. Effect of length-to-diameter ratio on the unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil specimens. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 75 (2), 793–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halsted, GE, Adaska, WS, and McConnell, WT, 2008. Guide to cement-modified soil (CMS).
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, RG, and Monismith, CL, 1971. Factors influencing the resilient response of granular materials. Highway Research Record, 345, 15–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, G, 2008. Technical basis of Austroads guide to pavement technology, part 2: pavement structural design (No. AP-T98/08).
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, G, and De carteret, R, 2009. Guide to pavement technology: part 4I: earthworks materials.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D, and Jones, D, 2010. Guidelines for the stabilization of subgrade soils in California. California: California Digital Library, University of California, 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lambe, T. W., and Whitman, R. V., 2008. Soil mechanics SI version. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• LCPC-SETRA, 1992. Guide des Terrassements Routiers, Réalisation des remblais et des couches de forme (GTR), Fascicules I et II.
   Google Scholar
• Little, DN, 1995. Stabilization of pavement subgrades and base courses with lime.
   Google Scholar
• Lucian, C, 2013. Effectiveness of mellowing time on the properties of two-stage lime-cement stabilized expansive soils. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT), 2 (5), 623–634.
   Google Scholar
• Pezo, R, and Hudson, WR, 1994. Prediction models of resilient modulus for nongranular materials. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 17 (3), 349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prusinski, J, and Bhattacharja, S, 1999. Effectiveness of Portland cement and lime in stabilizing clay soils. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1652 (1), 215–227.
   Google Scholar
• Rout, RK, et al., 2012. Resilient moduli behavior of lime-cement treated subgrade soils InGeoCongress 2012, 25–29 March 2012, California, United States American Society of Civil Engineers, 1428–1437.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, G, et al., 2012. Study on the geotechnical properties of cement based composite fine-grained soil. International Journal of Advanced Structures and Geotechnical Engineering, 1 (2), 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Shogaki, T, 2007. Effect of specimen size on unconfined compressive strength properties of natural deposits. Soils and Foundations, 47 (1), 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shooshpasha, I, and Shirvani, RA, 2015. Effect of cement stabilization on geotechnical properties of sandy soils. Geomechanics and Engineering, 8 (1), 17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solanki, P, Zaman, MM, and Dean, J, 2010. Resilient modulus of clay subgrades stabilized with lime, class C fly ash, and cement kiln dust for pavement design. Transportation Research Record, 2186 (1), 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Technique, G, 2000. ‘Traitement des sols à la chaux et/ou aux liants hydrauliques’, GTS) SETRA/LCPC–2000.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J, 1985. Characterization of granular material. Transportation Research Record, 1022 (1), 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Vicroads, 2013. Vicroads’ test method RC 131.01- Lime Saturation Point of Soil (pH Method), Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Vicroads, 2015. Standard Sections-200 Series- Formation Section 204- Earthworks, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Vuong, B.T., and Brimble, R., 2000. Austroads repeated load triaxial test method: Determination of permanent deformation and resilient modulus characteristics of unbound granular materials under drained conditions, APRG Document 00/33 (MA), Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Yong, R.N., and Ouhadi, V.R, 2007. Experimental study on instability of bases on natural and lime/cement-stabilized clayey soils. Applied Clay Science, 35 (3–4), 238–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar