576
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

3D-finite element pavement structural model for using with traffic speed deflectometers

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 4065-4079 | Received 10 Feb 2021, Accepted 17 May 2021, Published online: 02 Jun 2021

References

  • Al-Qadi, I.L., et al., 2007. Effectiveness of geogrid-reinforcement in flexible pavements: A full-scale testing.
  • Alae, M., Haghshenas, H.F., and Zhao, Y, 2019. Evaluation of top-down crack propagation in asphalt pavement under dual tire loading. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 46 (8), 704–711.
  • Alshukri, A.A., et al., 2019. Effect of Particle Size and Content of Crumb Rubber on the Dynamic Properties of Passenger Tyre Tread Using Finite Element Method. Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering, (2000), 1–13.
  • Bai, T., et al., 2020. Viscoelastic modelling of an asphalt pavement based on actual tire-pavement contact pressure. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 0 (0), 1–20.
  • Ban, H., Im, S., and Kim, Y.R, 2013. Nonlinear viscoelastic approach to model damage-associated performance behavior of asphaltic mixture and pavement structure. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40 (4), 313–323.
  • Bazi, G., et al., 2020. Finite element modelling of the rolling resistance due to pavement deformation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (3), 365–375.
  • Bekheet, W., Hassan, Y., and Abd El Halim, A.O., 2001. Modelling in situ shear strength testing of asphalt concrete pavements using the finite element method. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 28 (3), 541–544.
  • The Bells Equations – LTPP Guide to Asphalt Temperature Prediction and Correction, – FHWA-RD-98-085 [online], 2021. Available from: https://www.fhwa.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/ltpp/98085/tempred.cfm [Accessed 25 January 2021].
  • Březina, I., Stryk, J., and Grošek, J, 2017. Using traffic speed deflectometer to measure deflections and evaluate bearing capacity of asphalt road pavements at network level. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 236, 1.
  • Eghbalpoor, R., Baghani, M., and Shahsavari, H, 2019. An implicit finite element framework considering damage and healing effects with application to cyclic moving load on asphalt pavement. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 70, 139–151.
  • ELMOD Software for Pavement Analysis | Dynatest [online], 2020. Available from: https://www.dynatest.com/elmod-software [Accessed 17 June 2020].
  • Elseifi, M.A., et al., 2012. Evaluation of continuous deflection testing using the rolling wheel deflectometer in Louisiana. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (4), 414–422.
  • Explicit dynamic analysis [online], 2021. Available from: https://abaqus-docs.mit.edu/2017/English/SIMACAEANLRefMap/simaanl-c-expdynamic.htm [Accessed 14 April 2021].
  • Fervers, C.W, 2004. Improved FEM simulation model for tire-soil interaction. Journal of Terramechanics, 41 (2–3), 87–100.
  • Fish, J., and Belytschko, T., 2007. A first course in finite elements.
  • Flintsch, G.W., et al., 2012. Evaluation of traffic-speed deflectometers. Transportation Research Record, 2304 (2304), 37–46.
  • Fuentes, L., et al., 2020. A probabilistic approach to detect structural problems in flexible pavement sections at network level assessment. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–14.
  • Hamim, A., et al., 2018. Comparative study on using static and dynamic finite element models to develop FWD measurement on flexible pavement structures. Construction and Building Materials, 176, 583–592.
  • Hu, X., and Walubita, L.F, 2009. Modelling tensile strain response in asphalt pavements: bottom-up and/or top-down fatigue crack initiation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10 (1), 125–154.
  • Hu, X., and Walubita, L.F, 2010. Effects of layer interfacial bonding conditions on the mechanistic responses in asphalt pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (1), 28–36.
  • Katicha, S.W., et al., 2014. Limits of agreement method for comparing TSD and FWD measurements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (6), 532–541.
  • Kim, D, 2008. Super-single tire loadings and their impacts on pavement design. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35 (2), 119–128.
  • Lerthanapredakul, J., and Powell, R.L., 1982. Viscoelastic properties of filled polymeric fluids. Annual Meeting – American Institute of Chemical Engineers.
  • Li, M., et al., 2017. Finite element modeling and parametric analysis of viscoelastic and nonlinear pavement responses under dynamic FWD loading. Construction and Building Materials, 141, 23–35.
  • Liu, Q., and Shalaby, A, 2013. Simulation of pavement response to tire pressure and shape of contact area. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 40 (3), 236–242.
  • Luk-Cyr, J., et al., 2013. Interconversion of linearly viscoelastic material functions expressed as Prony series: a closure. Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 17 (1), 53–82.
  • Madsen, S.S, and Niels, L.P., 2019. Backcalculation of Raptor (RWD) measurements and forward prediction of FWD deflections compared with FWD measurements. Airfield and Highway Pavements, 3, 255–265.
  • Matsuzaki, R., et al., 2010. Analysis of applied load estimation using strain for intelligent tires. Journal of Solid Mechanics and Materials Engineering, 4 (10), 1496–1510.
  • Monk, P., 2003. Finite element methods for Maxwell’s equations.
  • Nasimifar, M., et al., 2017. Dynamic analyses of traffic speed deflection devices. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (5), 381–390.
  • Ncat – National Center for Asphalt Technology [online], 2020. Available from: http://eng.auburn.edu/research/centers/ncat/ [Accessed 29 August 2020].
  • Nielsen, C.P, 2019. Visco-elastic back-calculation of traffic speed deflectometer measurements. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (12), 439–448.
  • Ong, G.P., and Fwa, T.F, 2010. Mechanistic interpretation of braking distance specifications and pavement friction requirements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2155 (1), 145–157.
  • Park, S.W., and Schapery, R.A, 1999. Methods of interconversion between linear viscoelastic material functions. Part I – A numerical method based on Prony series. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 36 (11), 1653–1675.
  • Patil, V.A., Sawant, V.A., and Deb, K, 2013. 2-D finite element analysis of rigid pavement considering dynamic vehicle-pavement interaction effects. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37 (3), 1282–1294.
  • Peng, Y., et al., 2019. Finite element method-based skid resistance simulation using in-situ 3D pavement surface texture and friction data. Materials, 12 (23), 7–9.
  • RAPTOR | Rolling Weight Deflectometer (RWD) | Dynatest [online], 2020. Available from: https://www.dynatest.com/rolling-weight-deflectometer-raptor [Accessed 17 June 2020]
  • Ross, S, 2009. Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
  • Schapery, R., 1974. Viscoelastic behavior and analysis of composite materials.
  • Shrestha, S., et al., 2018. Application of traffic speed deflectometer for network-level pavement management. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (40), 348–359.
  • Skar, A., et al., 2020. Analysis of a moving measurement platform based on line profile sensors for project-level pavement evaluation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 0 (0), 1–17.
  • Tang, X., and Yang, X, 2013. Inverse analysis of pavement structural properties based on dynamic finite element modeling and genetic algorithm. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2 (1), 15–30.
  • Traffic Speed Deflectometer – Greenwood Engineering [online], 2020. Available from: https://greenwood.dk/road/tsd/ [Accessed 17 June 2020].
  • Walubita, L.F., et al., 2014. HMA shear resistance, permanent deformation, and rutting tests for Texas mixes: Final year-2 report.
  • Walubita, L.F., et al., 2019. Comparative evaluation of five HMA rutting-related laboratory test methods relative to field performance data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTT. Construction and Building Materials, 215, 737–753.
  • Wang, H., and Li, M, 2016. Comparative study of asphalt pavement responses under FWD and moving vehicular loading. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 142 (12), 1–9.
  • Wang, G., and Roque, R, 2010. Three-dimensional finite element modeling of static tire-pavement interaction. Transportation Research Record, 2155, 158–169.
  • Wu, C., et al., 2020. Asphalt pavement modulus backcalculation using surface deflections under moving loads. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 35 (11), 1246–1260.
  • Xu, Q., and Prozzi, J.A, 2015. A time-domain finite element method for dynamic viscoelastic solution of layered-half-space responses under loading pulses. Computers and Structures, 160, 20–39.
  • Yanjin, G., Guoqun, Z., and Gang, C, 2011. 3-Dimensional non-linear FEM modeling and analysis of steady-rolling of radial tires. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 30 (3), 229–240.
  • You, Q., Ma, J., and Qiu, X, 2018. Finite element analysis of effects of asphalt pavement distressers on FWD dynamic deflection basin, (July), 285–296.
  • Zhang, J., et al., 2013. Comparison of flow number, dynamic modulus, and repeated load tests for evaluation of HMA permanent deformation. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 391–398.
  • Zihan, Z.U.A., et al., 2020. Mechanistic-based approach to utilize traffic speed deflectometer measurements in back calculation analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2674 (5), 208–222.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.