916
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The use of deep neural networks for developing generic pavement rutting predictive models

, &
Pages 4260-4276 | Received 22 Dec 2020, Accepted 08 Jun 2021, Published online: 29 Jun 2021

References

  • AASHTO, 2015. Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: a manual of practice. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • Abambres, M., and Ferreira, A., 2017. Application of ANN in Pavement Engineering: state-of-Art. ffhal-02066889v2f.
  • Abaza, K.A, 2016. Simplified staged-homogenous Markov model for flexible pavement performance prediction. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 17 (2), 365–381.
  • Abu-Ennab, L.B., 2015. Developing pavement performance prediction models for the state of Arkansas. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
  • Alharbi, F., and Smadi, O, 2019. Predicting pavement performance utilizing artificial neural network (ANN) models. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 5 (8), 504–508.
  • Altmann, A., et al., 2010. Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure. Bioinformatics (oxford, England), 26 (10), 1340–1347.
  • Alyami, Z., Mizutani, D., Kaito, K., and Tighe, S., 2019. A dynamic optimal model for pavement asset management and PPP projects. In: M. Crispino, Ed. Pavement and Asset Management: proceedings of the World Conference on Pavement and Asset Management (WCPAM 2017). London: CRC Press, 175.
  • Amador-Jiménez, L.E. (Concordia U. and Mrawira, D. University of N.B.), 2012. Bayesian regression in pavement deterioration modeling: revisiting the AASHO road test Rut depth model. Infraestructura Vial, 14 (25), 28–35.
  • Archilla, A.R., and Madanat, S, 2000. Development of a pavement rutting model from experimental data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (4), 291–299.
  • ASCE, 2017. 2017 infrastructure report card. VA: ASCE Reston.
  • Bannour, A., et al., 2019. Optimization of the maintenance strategies of roads in Morocco: calibration study of the degradations models of the highway development and management (HDM-4) for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (2), 245–254.
  • Choi, S., and Do, M, 2020. Development of the road pavement deterioration model based on the Deep Learning method. Electronics, 9, 3. doi:10.3390/electronics9010003.
  • Choummanivong, L., and Martin, T., 2010. Interim Network Level Functional road deterioration Models. Austroads Publication No. AP–T158/10, ARRB.
  • Chu, C.-Y., and Durango-Cohen, P.L, 2008. Estimation of dynamic performance models for transportation infrastructure using panel data. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 42 (1), 57–81.
  • Cleveland, W.S., and Devlin, S.J, 1988. Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83 (403), 596–610.
  • Delzell, D.A.P., et al., 2019. Machine learning and feature selection methods for disease classification With application to lung cancer screening Image data. Frontiers in Oncology, 9, 1393. doi:10.3389/fonc.2019.01393.
  • Deori, S., et al., 2018. Calibration of HDM-4 models for Indian conditions of flexible pavement having modified bitumen in wearing course. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (9), 772–785.
  • Dreyfus, G., 2005. Neural networks: methodology and applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
  • Dzotepe, G., and Ksaibati, K., 2010. Implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG). Laramie, WY: Univ. of Wyoming.
  • El-Haggan, O.S., 2003. Evaluation of Rutting Behavior of Density Deficient Asphalt Mixtures.
  • Elkins, G.E., et al., 2018. Long-Term Pavement Performance Information Management System User Guide. Report No. FHWA-RD-03-088. McLean, VA.
  • FHWA, 2018. Transportation Asset management plan Development processes certification and recertification guidance. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Finn, F, 1998. Pavement management systems–past, present, and future. Public Roads, 62 (1), 16–22.
  • Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, 2015. Public Law No. 114–94, 129 Stat. 1312.
  • George, K.P., 2000. MDOT pavement management system: prediction models and feedback system. Mississippi: Dept. of Transportation.
  • Géron, A., 2019. Hands-On machine learning with scikit-learn, keras, and TensorFlow: concepts, tools, and techniques to Build intelligent systems. O’Reilly Media.
  • Gong, H., et al., 2018. Improving accuracy of rutting prediction for mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide with deep neural networks. Construction and Building Materials, 190, 710–718.
  • Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., and Courville, A, 2016. Deep learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gulli, A., and Pal, S, 2017. Deep learning with keras. Mumbai, India: Packt Publishing.
  • Hall, M.A., 1999. Correlation-based feature selection for machine learning.
  • Hasan, M.S., 2015. Deterioration Prediction of concrete bridge components using artificial intelligence and stochastic methods, (March).
  • He, K., et al., 2016. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 770–778.
  • Hong, F., and Prozzi, J.A, 2006. Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12 (2), 77–86.
  • Hosseini, S.A., Alhasan, A., and Smadi, O., 2020. Use of Deep learning to study Modeling deterioration of pavements a case study in iowa. Infrastructures, 5 (11), 95. doi:10.3390/infrastructures5110095.
  • Jackson, N., and Puccinelli, J, 2006. Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) data analysis support : national pooled fund study TPF-5 (013). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
  • Jain, S.S., Parida, M., and Thube, D.T, 2007. HDM-4 based optimal maintenance strategies for low-volume roads in India. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 16 (4), 3–15.
  • Ji, X., et al., 2016. Development of a rutting prediction model for asphalt pavements with the use of an accelerated loading facility. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 17 (1), 15–31.
  • Kargah-Ostadi, N., Menendez, J.R., and Zhou, Y, 2018. Using multi-objective Optimization to enhance calibration of performance models in the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (No. FHWA-HRT-17-104). United States: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Li, J., et al., 2005. The Highway Development and Management system in Washington state: calibration and application for the Department of Transportation road network. Transportation Research Record, 1933 (1), 52–61.
  • Li, N., 1997. Development of a probabilistic based, integrated pavement management system. Waterloo, Canada: UWSpace.
  • Li, Q.J., et al., 2019. Data needs and implementation of the pavement ME design. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 15 (1), 135–164.
  • LTPP InfoPave [online], 2020. Available from: https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/?Goto=Home [Accessed 15 Dec 2020].
  • Makowski, D., et al., 2020. Methods and algorithms for correlation analysis in R. Journal of Open Source Software, 5 (51), 2306.
  • Mamlouk, M., et al., 2018. Effects of the International roughness index and Rut depth on crash rates. Transportation Research Record, 2672 (40), 418–429.
  • McGhee, K.H, 2004. Automated pavement distress collection techniques. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • Moolayil, J., 2019. Tuning and deploying Deep neural networks BT - learn Keras for Deep neural networks: A fast-track approach to modern Deep learning with python. In: J. Moolayil, Ed. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 137–159.
  • Moving Ahead for Progress in the twenty-first Century Act, 2012. United States: 126.
  • Norouzi, A., Kim, D., and Richard Kim, Y, 2016. Numerical evaluation of pavement design parameters for the fatigue cracking and rutting performance of asphalt pavements. Materials and Structures, 49 (9), 3619–3634.
  • Ozbay, K., and Laub, R., 2001. Models for pavement deterioration using LTPP.
  • Paterson, W.D.O., 1987. Road Deterioration and Maintenance Effects: Models for Planning and Management.
  • Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2018. Research trends in pavement management during the first years of the twenty-first century: A bibliometric analysis during the 2000–2013 period. Applied Sciences, 8 (7), 1041.
  • Picard, R.R., and Berk, K.N, 1990. Data splitting. The American Statistician, 44 (2), 140–147.
  • Prozzi, J.A., and Madanat, S.M, 2004. Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10 (1), 9–22.
  • Puccinelli, J., and Jackson, N, 2007. Development of pavement performance models to account for frost effects and their application to mechanistic–Empirical Design Guide calibration. Transportation Research Record, 1990 (1), 95–101.
  • Qamhia, I.I.A., et al., 2019. Implementation framework of the UIUC aggregate base rutting model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–13. doi:10.1080/10298436.2019.1683178.
  • Von Quintus, H.L, 2012. Calibration of rutting models for structural and Mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • Rafiq, M.Y., Bugmann, G., and Easterbrook, D.J, 2001. Neural network design for engineering applications. Computers & Structures, 79 (17), 1541–1552.
  • Saha, P., Ksaibati, K., and Atadero, R, 2017. Developing pavement distress deterioration models for pavement management system using markovian probabilistic process. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2017, 9. Article ID 8292056. doi:10.1155/2017/8292056.
  • Schwartz, C.W., et al., 2015. Evaluation of Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTTP) Climatic Data for Use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) Calibration and Other Pavement Analysis. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
  • Schwartz, C.W., et al., 2013. Global sensitivity analysis of mechanistic–empirical performance predictions for flexible pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2368 (1), 12–23.
  • Simms, R., Hernando, D., and Roque, R, 2020. A new paradigm to explain the development of instability rutting in asphalt pavements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (7), 1815–1828.
  • Simpson, A.L, 1999. Characterization of transverse profile. Transportation Research Record, 1655 (1), 185–191.
  • Simpson, A.L., 2001. Measurement of rutting in asphalt pavements. Washington, DC: The University of Texas at Austin.
  • Tarefder, R.A., White, L., and Zaman, M, 2005. Development and application of a rut prediction model for flexible pavement. Transportation Research Record, 1936 (1), 201–209.
  • Thube, D.T., 2006. Performance based maintenance management for rural roads. Roorkee, India: Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee.
  • Thube, D.T, 2012. Artificial neural network (ANN) based pavement deterioration models for Low volume roads in India. International Journal of Pavement Research & Technology, 5 (2), 115–120.
  • TRIP, 2016. The interstate Highway system turns 60: challenges to Its ability to continue to save lives, time and money. Washington, DC: TRIP.
  • Wang, Z., et al., 2020. Prediction of highway asphalt pavement performance based on Markov chain and artificial neural network approach. The Journal of Supercomputing, 77, 1354–1376. doi:10.1007/s11227-020-03329-4.
  • Wix, R., et al., 2018. Guide to Asset Management – Technical Information Part 15: Technical Supplements.
  • Wolters, A.S., and Zimmerman, K.A., 2010a. Current practices in pavement performance modeling project 08-03 (C07): task 4 report final summary of findings. Pennsylvania: Dept. of Transportation. Bureau of Planning and Research.
  • Wolters, A.S., and Zimmerman, K.A., 2010b. Current Practices in Pavement Performance Modeling.
  • World Bank, 2008. HDM-4: Deterioration of Bituminous Roads.
  • Yakir, B., 2013. Extremes in random fields: a theory and its applications. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Yang, J., et al., 2003. Overall pavement condition forecasting using neural networks—An application to Florida Highway network. Transportation Research Record, 1853 (1). doi:10.3141/1853-01.
  • Yao, L., et al., 2019. Establishment of prediction models of asphalt pavement performance based on a novel data calibration method and neural network. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (1). doi:10.1177/0361198118822501.
  • Zhang, X., Chen, X., Yao, L., Ge, C., and Dong, M., 2019. Deep neural network hyperparameter Optimization with orthogonal array tuning. In: International Conference on neural information processing. Sydney, Australia: Springer, 287–295.
  • Zhang, Y., et al., 2020. Evaluation of rutting potential of flexible pavement structures using energy-based pseudo variables. Construction and Building Materials, 247, 118391. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118391.
  • Zhang, Z., and Gao, L, 2018. A nested modelling approach to infrastructure performance characterisation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (2), 174–180.
  • Zhou, F., and Scullion, T, 2002. Discussion: three stages of permanent deformation curve and rutting model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (4), 251–260.
  • Zou, G., Xu, J., and Wu, C, 2017. Evaluation of factors that affect rutting resistance of asphalt mixes by orthogonal experiment design. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10 (3), 282–288.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.