Influence of shotblasting treatment on asphalt pavement performance

References

• Anderson, K. W., Uhlmeyer, J., and Pierce, L. 2007. PCCP texture modification using the skidabrader, Olympia: Washington State Department of Transportation. WA-RD 667.1.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R, 2007. Blastrac shot blasting trial and technical assessment. Bendigo, Victoria: Geotest Civil Services.
   Google Scholar
• Blastrac, 2013. ITC Blastrac Trial – Retexturing porous asphalt by steel shot blasting. Rijkswaterstaat Water Verkeer en Leefomgeving, RWS Innovation Test Centre (ITC).
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 1997. Skid resistance and crashes: a review of the literature. Vermont, South Victoria, Australia: ARRB Transport Research Ltd., Research Report 311.
   Google Scholar
• Corsello, P, 1993. Evaluation of surface friction guidelines for Washington state highways. Seattle: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Diringer, K.T, and Barros, R.T. 1988, Predicting the skid resistance of bituminous pavements through accelerated laboratory testing of aggregates. First international symposium on surface characteristics, Philadelphia, PA, USA; State College, PA, USA. ASTM Special Technical Publication, ASTM: 61–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, P., Colucci, B., and Gandhi, S, 1991. Polishing of aggregates and wet-weather accident rates for flexible pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1300, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Giles, C., Sabey, B., and Cardew, K, 1962. ASTM STP 326: development and performance of the portable skid resistance tester. Philadelphia, PA: ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Gransberg, D.D, 2008. Impact of airport rubber removal techniques on runways. Washington, D.C.: TRB, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gransberg, D.D, 2009. Life cycle cost analysis of surface retexturing with shotblasting as a pavement preservation tool. Transportation research record. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2108, 46–52. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, F., et al., 2021. Effects of additional antistrip additives on durability and moisture susceptibility of granite-based open-graded friction course. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33 (9), 04021245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J., et al., 2009. NCHRP web-only document 108: Guide for pavement friction. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, W.B. and Griswold, G.D. 1975. Evaluation of high pressure water blast with rotating spray bar for removing paint and rubber deposits from airport runways, and review of runway slipperiness problems created by rubber contamination. Washington, DC: NASA Langley Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, pp. 66. TMX-72797.
   Google Scholar
• Iuele, T., et al., 2016. The influence of aggregate lithological nature on pavement texture polishing: a comparative investigation on a test site in southern Italy. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, 5 (1), 337–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, K., et al., 2009. Long-term monitoring of noise and friction properties of three pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2127, 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Guler, I., and Donnell, E, 2017. Pavement friction degradation based on Pennsylvania field test data. Transportation Research Record, 2639, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Maryland DOT. 2013. Evaluation of surface abrasion. Hanover, MD: Maryland Department of Transportation, State Highway Administration, Office of Materials Technology, Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi, S., Flintsch, G., and Khaleghian, S, 2019. Pavement friction management – artificial neural network approach. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (2), 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyce, D. A., et al., 2005. Incorporating road safety into pavement management: maximizing asphalt surface friction for road safety improvements. Madison, WI: Midwest Regional University Transportation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Omairey, E., et al., 2021. An equation-based multiphysics modelling framework for oxidative ageing of asphalt pavements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. N., et al., 2020. Effects of emulsion types, application rates, and crumb rubber on the laboratory performance of chip seal. Construction and Building Materials, 260, 119787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. N., et al., 2021. Short-term field performance and cost-effectiveness of crumb-rubber modified asphalt emulsion in chip seal applications. Transportation Research Record, 03611981211005469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, M., and Vargas-Nordcbeck, A, 2021. Structural performance of sections treated with thin overlays for pavement preservation. Transportation Research Record, 0361198121997816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, C. 2008. Pavement retexturing research data. OU research periodic report 1. Norman: University of Oklahoma. pp. 1–3. OTCREOS7.1-16.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, M. T. A., et al., 2020. Rheological and molecular characterizations of tire rubber modified asphalt emulsion. Transportation Research Record, 2674 (3), 12–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerritt, W.H, 1993. Aggregate type and traffic volume as controlling factors in bituminous pavement friction. Transportation Research Record, 1418, 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• West, T.R., et al., 2001. Evaluation of dolomite and related aggregates used in bituminous overlays for Indiana pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1757, 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, J., and Kulakowski, B, 2000. Prediction of risk of Wet-pavement accidents: fuzzy logic model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1717, 28–36.
   Google Scholar