Improved test method for determination of the equiviscous temperature of asphalt binders

References

• AASHTO M 320–16, 2016. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 315–12, 2016. Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Abedali, A. H, 2017. Evaluation of rutting susceptibility of modified asphalt binder. Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development, 21 (4), 105–121.
   Google Scholar
• Alisov, A., Hagner, T., and Walther, A., 2016. Quantification of polymer content in binder by modified MSCR-test. In: In Proceedings of 6th Eurasphalt and Eurobitume CongressPrague, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, E. D. C, 1930. The viscosity of liquids. Nature, 125 (3148), 309–310.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6373–15, 2015. Standard specification for performance graded asphalt binder. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Bahia, H. U., et al., 2001. Characterization of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design. NCHRP report 459. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bahia, H. U., Perdomo, D., and Turner, P, 1997. Applicability of Superpave binder testing protocols to modified binders. Transportation Research Record, 1586 (1), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Biro, S., Gandhi, T., and Amirkhanian, S, 2009. Determination of zero shear viscosity of warm asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (5), 2080–2086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN/TS 15324, 2008. Bitumen and bituminous binders–determination of equiviscous temperature based on low shear viscosity using dynamic shear rheometer in low frequency oscillatory mode. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• CEN/TS 15325, 2008. Bitumen and bituminous binders–determination of zero-shear viscosity (ZSV) using a shear stress rheometer in creep mode. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J. S., and Tsai, C. J, 1999. How good are linear viscoelastic properties of asphalt binder to predict rutting and fatigue cracking? Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 8 (4), 443–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, J., et al., 2007. Revision of the Superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 76, 123–162.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, J., and Dongr, R., 2002. Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders. In: Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual conference of the Canadian technical asphalt Association (CTAA)Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, R., Nam, K., and Bahia, H, 2006. Why do we need to change G*/sin δ and how? Road Materials and Pavement Design, 7 (1), 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmazes, C., et al., 2000. A protocol for reliable measurement of zero-shear-viscosity in order to evaluate the anti-rutting performance of binders. In: Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, European Asphalt Pavement AssociationBarcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• De Visscher, J., et al., 2004. A comparison of the zero shear viscosity from oscillation tests and the repeated creep test. In: In Proceedings of the 3rd Euroasphalt and Eurobitume CongressVienna.
   Google Scholar
• De Visscher, J., and Vanelstraete, A., 2004. Practical test methods for measuring the zero shear viscosity of bituminous binders. Materials and Structures, 37 (5), 360–364.
   Google Scholar
• De Visscher, J., and Vanelstraete, A., 2009. Equiviscous temperature based on low shear viscosity: evaluation as binder indicator for rutting and critical discussion of the test procedure. In Proceedings of 7th International RILEM symposium ATCBM09 on advance testing and characterization of bituminous materials, 2, 1009–1018.
   Google Scholar
• Dongré, R., et al., 2004. New criterion for Superpave high-temperature binder specification. Transportation Research Record, 1875 (1), 22–32.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, N., et al., 2012. Performance testing for Superpave and structural validation. Publication No. FHWA-HRT-11-045. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Harrigan, E. T., Leahy, R. B., and Youtcheff, J. S, 1994. Superpave manual of specifications, test methods and practices. SHRP-A-379. Washington, DC.: Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., Geng, H., and Sun, Y, 2015. Simplified viscosity evaluating method of high viscosity asphalt binders. Materials and Structures, 48 (7), 2147–2156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., et al., 2020. Characterization of the shear-thinning behavior of asphalt binders with consideration of yield stress. Materials and Structures, 53, 1–13. doi:10.1617/s11527-020-01538-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., et al., 2021. Use of the multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test to characterize the rutting potential of asphalt binders: A literature review. Construction and Building Materials, 121320, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121320.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., and Luo, R, 2020. Development of failure criterion and fatigue model to characterize the fatigue resistance of asphalt binders under controlled-stress time sweep tests. Materials and Structures, 53, 1–12. doi:10.1617/s11527-019-1436-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, W., Yang, T., and An, Q, 2001. Time-temperature-stress equivalence and its application to nonlinear viscoelastic materials. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica-English Edition, 14 (3), 195–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGennis, R. B., Shuler, S., and Bahia, H. U, 1994. Background of Superpave asphalt binder test methods. FHWA-SA-94-069. Washington D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Technology Applications.
   Google Scholar
• Morea, F., Agnusdei, J. O., and Zerbino, R, 2010. Comparison of methods for measuring zero shear viscosity in asphalts. Materials and Structures, 43 (4), 499–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, M. C., and Robertus, C., 1996. Binder rheology and asphaltic pavement permanent deformation: The zero-shear-viscosity. In: Euroasphalt and Eurobitume congresseuropean Asphalt Pavement Association, Strasbourg, France.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, G.M., D’Angelo, J., and Sharrock, M.J., 2002. Use of the zero shear viscosity as a parameter for the high temperature binder specification parameter. In: In 3rd International symposium on binder rheology and pavement PerformanceSan Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Saboo, N., et al., 2018. Study on viscosity of conventional and polymer modified asphalt binders in steady and dynamic shear domain. Mechanics of Time-Dependent Materials, 22 (1), 67–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboo, N., and Kumar, P, 2015. Study of flow behavior for predicting mixing temperature of bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, 87, 38–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon, D., and Zhai, H, 2002. Ranking asphalt binders by activation energy for flow. Journal of Applied Asphalt Binder Technology, 2 (2), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, E., et al., 2015. A novel procedure for the evaluation of anti-rutting potential of asphalt binders. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (4), 287–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy, A, 2001. Refinement of the Superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127 (5), 357–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy, A, 2004. High temperature performance grading of asphalts through a specification criterion that could capture field performance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 130 (1), 132–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sybilski, D, 1993. Non-Newtonian viscosity of polymer-modified bitumens. Materials and Structures, 26 (1), 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Sybilski, D, 1996. Zero-shear viscosity of bituminous binder and its relation to bituminous mixture's rutting resistance. Transportation Research Record, 1535 (1), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooijen, R. C., and De Bondt, A. H., 2004. Experience with the zero-shear viscosity concept to characterise rutting. In: In Proceedings of the 3rd Euroasphalt and Eurobitume CongressVienna.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, D., et al., 2019. A new short-term aging model for asphalt binders based on rheological activation energy. Materials and Structures, 52, 1–22. doi:10.1617/s11527-019-1364-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoorob, S. E., Castro-Gomes, J. P., and Oliveira, L. P, 2012. Assessing low shear viscosity as the new bitumen softening point test. Construction and Building Materials, 27 (1), 357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar