682
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Development of framework for ranking pervious concrete pavement mixtures: application of multi-criteria decision-making methods

, &
Article: 2021406 | Received 23 Oct 2021, Accepted 17 Dec 2021, Published online: 17 Jan 2022

References

  • Aliabdo, A. A., Abd Elmoaty, A. E. M., and Fawzy, A. M, 2018. Experimental investigation on permeability indices and strength of modified pervious concrete with recycled concrete aggregate. Construction and Building Materials, 193, 105–127.
  • American Concrete Institute, 2010. ACI 522: 2010. Report on Pervious Concrete (Reapproved 2011).
  • ASTM International, 2012. ASTM 1754/C1754-M: 2012. Test Method for Density and Void Content of Hardened Pervious Concrete.
  • ASTM International, 2015. ASTM C617: 2015. Standard Practice for Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.
  • ASTM International, 2021. ASTM C39: 2021. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.
  • Barnhouse, P. W., and Srubar, W. V, 2016. Material characterization and hydraulic conductivity modeling of macroporous recycled-aggregate pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 110, 89–97.
  • Bilal, H., et al., 2021. Influence of silica fume, metakaolin & SBR latex on strength and durability performance of pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 275, 122124.
  • Bonicelli, A., Giustozzi, F., and Crispino, M, 2015. Experimental study on the effects of fine sand addition on differentially compacted pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 91, 102–110.
  • Çalıskan, H., et al., 2013. Material selection for the tool holder working under hard milling conditions using different multi criteria decision making methods. Materials and Design, 45, 473–479.
  • Chandrappa, A. K., 2018. Development and characterization of pervious concrete mixtures for pavement applications. Thesis (PhD). IIT.
  • Chandrappa, A. K., and Biligiri, K. P, 2016a. Comprehensive investigation of permeability characteristics of pervious concrete: a hydrodynamic approach. Construction and Building Materials, 123, 627–637.
  • Chandrappa, A. K., and Biligiri, K. P, 2016b. Influence of mix parameters on pore properties and modulus of pervious concrete: an application of ultrasonic pulse velocity. Materials and Structures, 49 (12), 5255–5271.
  • Chandrappa, A. K., et al., 2018. Laboratory investigations and field implementation of pervious concrete paving mixtures. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, 7 (1), 20180039.
  • Chappat, M., and Bilal, J., 2003. The environmental road of the future: life cycle analysis. Paris: Colas SA, Vol. 9, 1–34.
  • Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V. M., and Chakraborty, S, 2009. Selection of materials using compromise ranking and outranking methods. Materials & Design, 30 (10), 4043–4053.
  • Chen, P, 2019. On the diversity-based weighting method for risk assessment and decision-making about natural hazards. Entropy, 21 (3), 269.
  • Chen, Y., et al., 2013. Strength, fracture and fatigue of pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 42, 97–104.
  • Choudhary, J., Kumar, B., and Gupta, A, 2021. Potential utilization of construction wastes in asphalt pavements as fillers using ranking framework. Construction and Building Materials, 277, 122262.
  • Ćosić, K., et al., 2015. Influence of aggregate type and size on properties of pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 78, 69–76.
  • Crouch, L. K., Jordan, P., and Ryan, H, 2007. Aggregate effects on pervious Portland cement concrete static modulus of elasticity. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. American Society of Civil Engineers, 19 (7), 561–568.
  • Deo, O., and Neithalath, N, 2010. Compressive behavior of pervious concretes and a quantification of the influence of random pore structure features. Materials Science and Engineering: A, Special Topic Section: Local and Near Surface Structure from Diffraction, 528 (1), 402–412.
  • Giustozzi, F, 2016. Polymer-modified pervious concrete for durable and sustainable transportation infrastructures. Construction and Building Materials, 111, 502–512.
  • Gupta, A., et al., 2021. Selection of fibers to improve porous asphalt mixtures using multi-criteria analysis. Construction and Building Materials, 266, 121198.
  • Huang, B., et al., 2010. Laboratory evaluation of permeability and strength of polymer-modified pervious concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 24 (5), 818–823.
  • Hwang, C.-L., and Yoon, K, 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Ibrahim, A., et al., 2014. Experimental study on Portland cement pervious concrete mechanical and hydrological properties. Construction and Building Materials, 50, 524–529.
  • Ibrahim, H. A., et al., 2020. Hydraulic and strength characteristics of pervious concrete containing a high volume of construction and demolition waste as aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 253, 119251.
  • Indian Standard, 1963. IS: 2386 – 1963. Methods of test for aggregates for concrete (Part 1) – Particle size and shape (Reaffirmed 2002).
  • Jahan, A., and Edwards, K, 2013. Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of engineering materials in product design (1st ed). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Jato-Espino, D., et al., 2018. Decision support model for the selection of asphalt wearing courses in highly trafficked roads. Soft Computing, 22 (22), 7407–7421.
  • Kant Sahdeo, Surya, et al., 2020. Effect of mix proportion on the structural and functional properties of pervious concrete paving mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 255, 119260.
  • Kevern, J. T., et al., 2008. Pervious concrete mixture proportions for improved freeze-thaw durability. Journal of ASTM International, 5 (2), 101320.
  • Kirubakaran, B., and Ilangkumaran, M, 2016. Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS. Annals of Operations Research, 245 (1), 285–313.
  • Nguyen, D. H., et al., 2014. A modified method for the design of pervious concrete mix. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 271–282.
  • Opricovic, S., 1998. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Thesis (PhD). Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade.
  • Pereira da Costa F. B., Haselbach L. M., and da Silva Filho L. C. P, 2021. Pervious concrete for desired porosity: influence of w/c ratio and a rheology-modifying admixture. Construction and Building Materials, 268, 121084.
  • Putman, B. J., and Neptune, A. I, 2011. Comparison of test specimen preparation techniques for pervious concrete pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (8), 3480–3485.
  • Rao, R. V, 2008. A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Materials & Design, 29 (10), 1949–1954.
  • Rizvi, R, et al., 2009. Laboratory Sample Preparation Techniques for Pervious Concrete. [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting.
  • Saaty, R. W, 1987. The analytic hierarchy process – what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9 (3–5), 161–176.
  • Şahin, M., 2021. A comprehensive analysis of weighting and multicriteria methods in the context of sustainable energy. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18 (6), 1591–1616.
  • Şimşek, B., İç, Y. T., and Şimşek, E. H., 2013. A TOPSIS-based Taguchi optimization to determine optimal mixture proportions of the high strength self-compacting concrete. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 125, 18–32.
  • Singh, A., et al., 2019. Rational approach for characterizing in situ infiltration parameters of two-layered pervious concrete pavement systems. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 31 (11), 04019258.
  • Singh, A., Sampath, P. V., and Biligiri, K. P, 2020a. A review of sustainable pervious concrete systems: emphasis on clogging, material characterization, and environmental aspects. Construction and Building Materials, 261, 120491.
  • Singh, A., Vaddy, P., and Biligiri, K. P, 2020b. Quantification of embodied energy and carbon footprint of pervious concrete pavements through a methodical lifecycle assessment framework. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104953.
  • Slebi-Acevedo, C. J., et al., 2021. A multi-criteria decision-making analysis for the selection of fibres aimed at reinforcing asphalt concrete mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Taylor & Francis, 22 (6), 763–779.
  • Slebi-Acevedo, C. J., Ruge-Cárdenas J. C., and Castro-Fresno D, 2020. An integrated DoE – stochastic multi criteria decision-making analysis applied for experimental evaluation of fiber reinforced porous asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 255, 119330.
  • Tennis, P. D., Leming, M. L., and Akers, D. J, 2004. Pervious concrete pavements. Portland cement association, skokie, Illinois, and national ready mixed concrete association. Silver Spring, MD: Portland Cement Association.
  • Torres-Machi, C., et al., 2019. Sustainability evaluation of pavement technologies through multicriteria decision techniques. Journal of Infrastructure Systems. American Society of Civil Engineers, 25 (3), 04019023.
  • Vaddy, P., et al., 2021. Multi-scale in-situ investigation of infiltration parameter in pervious concrete pavements. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 49 (5), 3519–3527.
  • Wang, K., Schaefer, V. R., and Kevern, J. T, 2006. Development of mix proportion for functional and durable pervious concrete. Nashville, TN: NRMCA Concrete Technology Forum: Focus on Pervious Concrete. 1–12.
  • Wu, H., et al., 2016. Experimental investigation on freeze–thaw durability of Portland cement pervious concrete (PCPC). Construction and Building Materials, 117, 63–71.
  • Yang, X., et al., 2020. Performance and ITZ of pervious concrete modified by vinyl acetate and ethylene copolymer dispersible powder. Construction and Building Materials, 235, 117532.
  • Zhang, Q., et al., 2020. Mix design for recycled aggregate pervious concrete based on response surface methodology. Construction and Building Materials, 259, 119776.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.