366
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The role of stress sensitivity of modified binders with the same linear viscoelastic properties in evaluating rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures

, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2027417 | Received 27 Jul 2021, Accepted 05 Jan 2022, Published online: 31 Jan 2022

References

  • AASHTO M 323, 2013. Standard specification for Superpave volumetric mix design. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO M 332, 2020. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO T 240, 2017. Standard method of test for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO T 312, 2014. Standard method of test for preparing and determining the density of asphalt mixture specimens by means of the Superpave gyratory compactor. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO T 350, 2019. Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO T 378, 2017. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • Ahmed, A.W., et al., 2019. Pavement performance follow-up and evaluation of polymer-modified test sections. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (12), 1474–1487.
  • Anderson, D.A., et al., 1994. Binder characterization and evaluation, volume 3: physical characterization. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, SHRP-A-369.
  • Arnold, T.S., Youtcheff, J., and Needham, S.P., 2012. Use of phosphoric acid as modifier for hot-mix asphalt. In: Transportation research circular (No. E-C 160): polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt binders – a workshop, April 2009, Minneapolis, MN. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 40–51.
  • Asphalt Institute, 2005. IS 220 polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt. Asphalt Institute.
  • Asphalt Institute, 2015. MS-2 asphalt mix design methods. 7th ed. Asphalt Institute.
  • Asphalt Institute, 2020. US state binder specifications. Asphalt Institute.
  • ASTM D7643, 2010. Standard practice for determining the continuous grading temperatures and continuous grades for PG graded asphalt binders. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
  • Awanti, S.S., Amarnath, M.S., and Veeraragavan, A., 2008. Laboratory evaluation of SBS modified bituminous paving mix. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 20 (4), 327–330.
  • Babagoli, R., 2020. Investigation of the high-temperature behaviour of asphalt binders modified by warm additives through performance grade and multiple stress creep and recovery system. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32 (2), 04019344.
  • Bahia, H.U., et al., 2001. Characterization of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, NCHRP 459.
  • Bennert, T., and Martin, J.V., 2012. Polyphosphoric acid in combination with Styrene-Butadiene-styrene block copolymer. In: transportation research circular (No. E-C 160): polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt binders – a workshop, April 2009 Minneapolis, MN. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: 70–85.
  • Biligiri, K.P., et al., 2007. Rational modelling of tertiary flow for asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001 (1), 63–72.
  • Bonaquist, R.F., 2012. Evaluation of flow number (FN) as a discriminating HMA mixture property. Wisconsin Highway Research Program. Madison: University of Wisconsin, WHRP 12-01.
  • Bonaquist, R.F., Christensen, D.W., and Stump, W., 2003. Simple performance tester for Superpave mix design: first-article development and evaluation. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press, NCHRP 513.
  • Bouldin, M.G., Dongré, R., and D’Angelo, J., 2001. Proposed refinement of Superpave high-temperature specification parameter for performance-graded binders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1766 (1), 40–47.
  • Brown, E.R., et al., 2009. Hot mix asphalt materials, mixture design, and construction. Lanham: NAPA Research and Education Foundation.
  • Dai, X., et al., 2020. Evaluation of the rutting performance of the field specimen using the Hamburg wheel-tracking test and dynamic modulus test. Advances in Civil Engineering, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2020/9525179.
  • D’Angelo, J., et al., 2007. Revision of the Superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 76, 123–162.
  • D’Angelo, J., 2012. Effect of polyphosphoric acid on asphalt binder properties. In: Transportation research circular (No. E-C 160): polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt binders – a workshop, April 2009, Minneapolis, MN. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 27–39.
  • D’Angelo, J., and Dongré, R., 2002. Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders. In: 47th annual conference of the Canadian technical asphalt association (CTAA), November 2002, Calgary, Alberta.
  • D’Angelo, J., and Dongré, R., 2009. Practical use of multiple stress creep and recovery test: characterization of styrene–butadiene–styrene dispersion and other additives in polymer-modified asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2126 (1), 73–82.
  • D’Angelo, J., Dongré, R., and Reinke, G., 2006. Evaluation of repeated creep and recovery test method as an alternative to SHRP+ requirements for polymer modified asphalt binders. In: 51st annual conference of the Canadian technical asphalt association (CTAA), November 2006, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island.
  • Delgadillo, R., and Bahia, H.U., 2010. The relationship between nonlinearity of asphalt binders and asphalt mixture permanent deformation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 11 (3), 653–680.
  • Delgadillo, R., Bahia, H.U., and Lakes, R., 2012. A nonlinear constitutive relationship for asphalt binders. Materials and Structures, 45 (3), 457–473.
  • Delgadillo, R., Cho, D.W., and Bahia, H.U., 2006. Nonlinearity of repeated creep and recovery binder test and relationship with mixture permanent deformation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1962 (1), 2–11.
  • Domingos, M.D.I., and Faxina, A.L., 2014. Creep-recovery behaviour of modified asphalt binders with similar high-temperature performance grades. In: 93rd annual meeting of transportation research board (No. 14-4666), January 2014, Washington, DC.
  • Domingos, M.D.I., and Faxina, A.L., 2016. Susceptibility of asphalt binders to rutting: literature review. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (2), 04015134.
  • Dongré, R., et al., 2004. New criterion for Superpave high-temperature binder specification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1875 (1), 22–32.
  • Dongré, R., and D’Angelo, J., 2003. Refinement of Superpave high-temperature binder specification based on pavement performance in the accelerated loading facility. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1829 (1), 39–46.
  • Dongré, R., D’Angelo, J., and Copeland, A., 2009. Refinement of flow number as determined by asphalt mixture performance tester: Use in routine quality control–quality assurance practice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2127 (1), 127–136.
  • Fee, D., et al., 2010. Polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2179 (1), 49–57.
  • Francken, L., 1977. Pavement deformation law of bituminous road mixes in repeated load triaxial compression. In: 4th international conference on the structural design of asphalt pavements, August 1977, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.
  • Garba, R., and Horvli, I., 2005. Simplified testing method for evaluation of asphalt mixtures for their susceptibility to permanent deformation. In: 7th international conferences on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields (BCRRA), June 2005, Norway.
  • Gierhart, D., 2013. Multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR): Why it should be implemented. In: Louisiana transportation conference (LTC), February 2013, Baton Rouge, LA.
  • Goh, S.W., et al., 2011. Preliminary dynamic modulus criteria of HMA for field rutting of asphalt pavements: Michigan’s experience. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (1), 37–45.
  • Golalipour, A., Bahia, H.U., and Tabatabaee, H.A., 2017. Critical considerations toward better implementation of the multiple stress creep and recovery test. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (5), 04016295.
  • Hajikarimi, P., et al., 2018. Introducing a stress-dependent fractional nonlinear viscoelastic model for modified asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 183, 102–113.
  • Hajikarimi, P., Rahi, M., and Moghadas Nejad, F., 2015. Comparing different rutting specification parameters using high temperature characteristics of rubber-modified asphalt binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (4), 751–766.
  • Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Isacsson, U., and Lu, X., 1995. Testing and appraisal of polymer modified road bitumens—state of the art. Materials and Structures, 28 (3), 139–159.
  • Jafari, M., and Babazadeh, A., 2016. Evaluation of polyphosphoric acid-modified binders using multiple stress creep and recovery and linear amplitude sweep tests. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 17 (4), 859–876.
  • Jafari, M., Babazadeh, A., and Aflaki, S., 2015. Effects of stress levels on creep and recovery behaviour of modified asphalt binders with the same continuous performance grades. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2505 (1), 15–23.
  • Kataware, A.V., and Singh, D., 2017. A study on rutting susceptibility of asphalt binders at high stresses using MSCR test. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 2 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1007/s41062-017-0051-1.
  • Kok, B.V., Yilmaz, M., and Geçkil, A., 2013. Evaluation of low-temperature and elastic properties of crumb rubber-and SBS-modified bitumen and mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (2), 257–265.
  • Kommidi, S.R., and Kim, Y.R., 2019. Investigation of DSR test methods to determine binder low temperature properties. Nebraska Department of Transportation (NDOT). University of Nebraska, Lincoln, SPR-1 (18) M073.
  • Kumar, S.A., and Veeraragavan, A., 2011. Dynamic mechanical characterization of asphalt concrete mixes with modified asphalt binders. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 528 (21), 6445–6454.
  • Kwon, O., et al., 2020. Evaluation of the performance of highly modified asphalt binder using accelerated pavement testing. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–9. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1714617.
  • Laukkanen, O.V., et al., 2015. Creep-recovery behaviour of bituminous binders and its relation to asphalt mixture rutting. Materials and Structures, 48 (12), 4039–4053.
  • Liu, J., et al., 2020a. Evaluation of multiple stress-creep recovery test on Alaskan asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32 (10), 04020302.
  • Liu, H., et al., 2020b. Development of two-step secant method to interpret the flow number test data of asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 32 (4), 04020027.
  • Liu, H., et al., 2020c. Rheological properties and modification mechanism of polyphosphoric acid-modified asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (4), 1078–1095.
  • McGennis, R.B., 2012. Implementation of polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt binders and related experience: Case study. In: Transportation research circular (No. E-C 160): polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt binders – a workshop, April 2009 Minneapolis, MN. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 136–149.
  • Mogawer, W.S., et al., 2011. Evaluation of the effects of hot mix asphalt density on mixture fatigue performance, rutting performance and MEPDG distress predictions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (2), 161–175.
  • Moraes, R., Swiertz, D., and Bahia, H.U., 2017. Comparison of new test methods and new specifications for rutting resistance and elasticity of modified binders. In: 62nd annual conference of the Canadian technical asphalt association (CTAA), November 2017, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
  • Nejad, F.M., et al., 2015. Evaluation of rutting properties of high density polyethylene modified binders. Materials and Structures, 48 (10), 3295–3305.
  • Pellinen, T.K., and Witczak, M.W., 2002. Use of stiffness of hot-mix asphalt as a simple performance test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789 (1), 80–90.
  • Perilakalathil, A., and Narayan, S.A., 2020. Relationship between nonlinear viscoelastic behaviour of asphalt binders and deformation of mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–11. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1763346.
  • Petersen, J.C., et al., 1994. Binder characterization and evaluation, volume 4: test methods. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, SHRP-A-370.
  • Reinke, G., et al., 2012. Polyphosphoric acid–modified binders and mixtures: aggregate and binder interactions, rutting, and moisture sensitivity of mixtures. In: Transportation research circular (No. E-C 160): polyphosphoric acid modification of asphalt binders – a workshop, April 2009, Minneapolis, MN. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, 86–105.
  • Saboo, N., and Kumar, P., 2015. A study on creep and recovery behaviour of asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 96, 632–640.
  • Salim, R., et al., 2019. Effect of MSCR percent recovery on performance of polymer modified asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673 (5), 308–319.
  • Shenoy, A., 2001. Refinement of the Superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 127 (5), 357–362.
  • Walubita, L.F., et al., 2019. Comparative evaluation of five HMA rutting-related laboratory test methods relative to field performance data: DM, FN, RLPD, SPST, and HWTT. Construction and Building Materials, 215, 737–753.
  • Wasage, T.L.J., Stastna, J., and Zanzotto, L., 2011. Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (6), 561–568.
  • West, R.C., et al., 2010. Mixing and compaction temperatures of asphalt binders in hot-mix asphalt. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, NCHRP 648.
  • Wilshire, R., and Evans, R., 1994. Acquisition and analysis of creep data. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design, 29 (3), 159–165.
  • Witczak, M.W., et al., 2002. Simple performance test for Superpave mix design. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, NCHRP 465.
  • Witczak, M.W., 2007. Specification criteria for simple performance tests for rutting. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, NCHRP 580.
  • Xiao, F., et al., 2014. Rheological property investigations for polymer and polyphosphoric acid modified asphalt binders at high temperatures. Construction and Building Materials, 64, 316–323.
  • Yadollahi, G., and Mollahosseini, H.S., 2011. Improving the performance of crumb rubber bitumen by means of poly phosphoric acid (PPA) and vestenamer additives. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (7), 3108–3116.
  • Yildirim, Y., 2007. Polymer modified asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 21 (1), 66–72.
  • Yusoff, N.I.M., 2012. Modelling the linear viscoelastic rheological properties of bituminous binders. Thesis (PhD). University of Nottingham.
  • Zhang, J., et al., 2016. Relating asphalt binder elastic recovery properties to HMA crack modelling and fatigue life prediction. Construction and Building Materials, 111, 644–651.
  • Zhang, W., et al., 2018. Fatigue resistance evaluation of modified asphalt using a multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) test. Applied Sciences, 8 (3), 417.
  • Zhou, Z., et al., 2018. Nonrecoverable behaviour of polymer modified and reclaimed asphalt pavement modified binder under different multiple stress creep recovery tests. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672 (28), 324–336.
  • Zhou, F., and Scullion, T., 2003. Preliminary field validation of simple performance tests for permanent deformation: case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1832 (1), 209–216.
  • Zhou, F., Scullion, T., and Sun, L., 2004. Verification and modelling of three-stage permanent deformation behaviour of asphalt mixes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 130 (4), 486–494.
  • Zhu, C., et al., 2018. Influence of base asphalt and SBS modifier on the weathering aging behaviours of SBS modified asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (3), 04017306.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.