GPR analysis to detect subsidence: a case study on a loaded reinforced concrete pavement

References

• Abdelmawla, A., and Kim, S.S., 2020. Application of Ground Penetrating Radar to estimate subgrade soil density. Infrastructures, 5 (2), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5020012.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetto, A., and Pajewski, L, 2015. Civil Engineering Applications of Ground Penetrating Radar. Switzerland: Springer International.
   Google Scholar
• Capozzoli, L., et al., 2020. Geophysical techniques for monitoring settlement phenomena occurring in reinforced concrete buildings. Surveys in Geophysics, 41, 575–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09554-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catakli, A., Mahdi, H., and Al-Shukri, H, 2011. Texture analysis of GPR data as a tool for depicting soil mineralogy. IEEE Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIPR.2011.6176377.
   Google Scholar
• De Domenico, D., Teramo, A., and Campo, D, 2013. GPR surveys for the characterization of foundation plinths within a seismic vulnerability analysis. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10 (3), 034007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/10/3/034007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deiana, D, 2008. A texture analysis of 3D GPR images. (PhD) dissertation, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Dos Reis, J.A., et al., 2014. Characterization of collapse paleocave systems using GPR attributes. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 103, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egli, P.E., Irving, J., and Lane, S.N, 2021. Characterization of subglacial marginal channels using 3D analysis of high-density ground-penetrating radar data. Journal of Glaciology, First View, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2021.26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland, R.S., and Odhiambo, L.O, 2007. Subsurface characterization using textural features extracted from GPR data. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 50 (1), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.22392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrig, M.D., Morris, D.V., and Bryant, J.T, 2004. Ground Penetrating Radar for concrete evaluation studies. Foundation Performance Association Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Gotlieb, C.C., and Kreyszig, H.E, 1990. Texture descriptors based on co-occurrence matrices. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 51 (1), 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0734-189X(05)80063-5.
   Google Scholar
• Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., and Dinstein, I, 1973. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-3 (6), 610–621. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W-T., et al., 2018. Analyses of GPR signals for characterization of ground conditions in urban areas. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 152, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshaghani, A., and Shokrabadi, M, 2021. Ground penetrating radar (GPR) applications in concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2021.1954182.
   Google Scholar
• Lagüela, S., et al., 2018. Joint use of GPR, IRT and TLS techniques for the integral damage detection in paving. Construction and Building Materials, 174, 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahouar, S, 2003. Development of data analysis algorithms for interpretation of Ground Penetrating Radar. PhD dissertation, Blacksburg, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S., et al., 2016. Integrated processing of image and GPR data for automated pothole detection. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30 (6), 04016015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo, H., Cuéllar, V., and Hernández, M.C, 2001. Close range radar remote sensing of concrete degradation in a textile factory floor. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 47, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-9851(01)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marecos, V., et al., 2017. Assessing the pavement subgrade by combining different non-destructive methods. Construction and Building Materials, 135, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClymont, A.F., et al., 2008. Visualization of active faults using geometric attributes of 3D GPR data: an example from the Alpine Fault Zone, New Zealand. Geophysics, 73 (2), B11–B23. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2825408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moysey, S., Knight, R.J., and Jol, H.M, 2006. Texture-based classification of ground-penetrating radar images. Geophysics, 71 (6), K111–K118. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2356114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, W.B, 2018. Semi-automatic determination of layer depth, permittivity and moisture content for unbound granular pavements using multi-offset 3-D GPR. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1539485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobes, D.C, 2016. Ground penetrating radar response from voids: a demonstration using a simple model. 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.
   Google Scholar
• Rasol, M., et al., 2020. NDT assessment of rigid pavement damages with ground penetrating radar: laboratory and field tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.17786922.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, J.-Y., et al., 2021. A study of the application and the limitations of GPR investigation of underground survey of the Korean expressways. Remote Sensing, 13 (9), 1805. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandmeier, K. J, 2021. ReflexW manual. Sandmeier Scientific Software. Available from: http://www.sandmeier-geo.de [Accessed 11 June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Sass, O., Bell, R., and Glade, T, 2008. Comparison of GPR, 2D-resistivity and traditional techniques for the subsurface exploration of the Öschingen landslide, Swabian Alb (Germany). Geomorphology, 93, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevil, J., et al., 2020. Characterizing and monitoring a high-risk sinkhole in an urban area underlain by salt through non-invasive methods: detailed mapping, high-precision leveling and GPR. Engineering Geology, 272, 105641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solla, M., et al., 2013. Uncertainty evaluation of the 1 GHz GPR antenna for the estimation of concrete asphalt thickness. Measurement, 46, 3032–3040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2013.06.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solla, M., et al., 2019. Assessing rebar corrosion through the combination of nondestructive GPR and IRT methodologies. Remote Sensing, 11, 1705. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141705.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solla, M., Pérez-Gracia, V., and Fontul, S, 2021. A review of GPR application on transport infrastructure: troubleshooting and best practices. Remote Sensing, 13 (4), 672. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallini, M., et al., 2004. GPR survey for investigation in building foundations. 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.
   Google Scholar
• Tomecka-Suchón, S., and Marcak, H, 2015. Interpretation of ground penetration radar attributes in identifying the risk of mining subsidence. Archives of Mining Sciences, 60 (2), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.1515/amsc-2015-0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. Y., et al., 2017. Time-frequency analysis of enhanced GPR detection of RF tagged buried plastic pipes. NDT&E International, 92, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., et al., 2016b. High-resolution glacier imaging and characterization by means of GPR attribute analysis. Geophysical Journal International, 206, 1366–1374. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W., Forte, E., and Pipan, M, 2016a. Texture attribute analysis of GPR data for archaeological prospection. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 173, 2737–2751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-016-1355-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar