Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation budget allocation considering multiple objectives and multiple stakeholders

References

• Abaza, K.A, 2006. Iterative linear approach for nonlinear nonhomogenous stochastic pavement management models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132 (3), 244–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., and Ashur, S.A, 2009. Optimum microscopic pavement management model using constrained integer linear programming. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (3), 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., Ashur, S.A., and Al-Khatib, I.A, 2004. Integrated pavement management system with a Markovian prediction model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 130 (1), 24–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhasan, A., et al., 2018. Impact of pavement surface condition on roadway departure crash risk in Iowa. Infrastructures, 3 (2), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Augeri, M.G., Greco, S., and Nicolosi, V, 2019. Planning urban pavement maintenance by a new interactive multiobjective optimization approach. European Transport Research Review, 11 (1), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, Q., et al., 2013. Multiobjective optimization for project selection in network-level bridge management incorporating decision-maker’s preference using the concept of Holism. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 18 (9), 879–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, C., and Bland, D, 2008. Highway asset management plan. communities and neighborhoods overview and scrutiny, item 9. Manchester: Manchester City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, M.W, 2006. Allocation of state transportation resources. Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee and Senate Finance Committee, 79th Session Interim, The Texas Senate, Austin, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, J., et al., 2014. Probabilistic life-cycle assessment as network-level evaluation tool for use and maintenance phases of pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2455 (1), 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Buddhavarapu, P., Banerjee, A., and Prozzi, J.A, 2013. Influence of pavement condition on horizontal curve safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 52, 9–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cafiso, S., et al., 2021. Crash modification functions for pavement surface condition and geometric design indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 149, 105887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, W.T., Fwa, T.F., and Hoque, K.Z, 2001. Constraint handling methods in pavement maintenance programming. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 9 (3), 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, W.T., Fwa, T.F., and Tan, J.Y, 2003. Optimal fund-allocation analysis for multidistrict highway agencies. Journal of Infrastructure System, 9 (4), 167–175.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C, 2008. Revised multi-choice goal programming. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 32 (12), 2587–2595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., and Cooper, W, 1961. Management model and industrial applications of linear programming. New York: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chehovits, J., and Galehouse, L, 2010. Energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions of pavement preservation processes for asphalt concrete pavements. Paper – 65, The First International Conference on Pavement Preservation. April 13–15, 2010, Newport Beach, California.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., and Bai, Q, 2019. Optimization in decision making in infrastructure asset management: A review. Applied Sciences, 9 (7), 1380.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Saeed, T.U., and Labi, S, 2017. Impact of road-surface condition on rural highway safety: A multivariate random parameters negative binomial approach. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, 16, 75–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., and Zheng, M, 2021. Multi-objective optimization for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making: A critical review and future directions. Automation in Construction, 130, 103840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., et al., 2018. Multiobjective optimization of asphalt pavement design and maintenance decisions based on sustainability principles and mechanistic-empirical pavement analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12 (6), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, J.C., and Huang, K.H, 2018. Mathematical programming framework for modeling and comparing network-level pavement maintenance strategies. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 109, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czyzyk, J., Mesnier, M. P., and Moré, J. J, 1998. The NEOS server. IEEE Journal on Computational Science and Engineering, 5 (3), 68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, E, 2001. The NEOS Server 4.0 Administrative Guide. Technical Memorandum ANL/MCS-TM-250, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Elhadidy, A.A., Elbeltagi, E.E., and Ammar, M.A, 2015. Optimum analysis of pavement maintenance using multi-objective genetic algorithms. HBRC Journal, 11 (1), 107–113.
   Google Scholar
• Farhan, J., and Fwa, T.F., 2016. A decentralized multidistrict optimization framework for system-wide pavement maintenance resource allocation. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 9(3), 214–221.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., Antunes, A., and Picado-Santos, L.I.S, 2002. Probabilistic segment-linked pavement management optimization model. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 128 (6), 568–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flintsch, G.W., and Bryant Jr., J.W, 2006. Asset management data collection for supporting decision process. office of asset management. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). [online] Available from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/asset/dataintegration/if08018/assetmgmt_web.pdf [Accessed July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• France-Mensah, J., and O’Brien, W.J, 2018. Budget allocation models for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation: comparative case study. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34 (2), 05018002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., Chan, W.T., and Hoque, K.Z, 1998. Analysis of pavement management activities programming by genetic algorithms. Transportation Research Record, 1643 (1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., Chan, W.T., and Hoque, K.Z, 2000. Multiobjective optimization for pavement maintenance programming. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (5), 367–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., and Farhan, J, 2012. Optimal multiasset maintenance budget allocation in highway asset management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (10), 1179–1187.
   Google Scholar
• GAMS Development Corporation, 2017. General Algebraic Modelling System (GAMS). Release 24.8. Washington, DC, USA. [online] Available from: https://www.gams.com/24.8/docs/index.html [Accessed June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• GAMS Development Corporation, 2021. General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS). [online] Available from: https://www.gams.com/ [Accessed July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., 2011. Optimal infrastructure maintenance scheduling problem under budget uncertainty. Thesis (Ph.D.). The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., et al., 2012. Network-level road pavement maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling for optimal performance improvement and budget utilization. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27 (4), 278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., and Zhang, Z., 2009. An approximate dynamic programming approach to network-level budget planning and allocation for pavement infrastructure. Proceedings of the Transportation Research Boards’ 88th Annual Meeting. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., and Zhang, Z, 2013. Management of pavement maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction through network partition. Transportation Research Record, 2366 (1), 59–63.
   Google Scholar
• Geedipally, S.R., Pratt, M.P., and Lord, D, 2019. Effects of geometry and pavement friction on horizontal curve crash frequency. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 11 (2), 167–188. doi:10.1080/19439962.2017.1365317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharaibeh, N.G., Chiu, Y., and Gurian, P.L, 2006. Decision methodology for allocating funds across transportation infrastructure assets. Journal of Infrastructure System, 12 (1), 1–9. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:1(1)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R.B., and Way, G.B, 1982. A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces, 12 (6), 5–21. doi:10.1287/inte.12.6.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafez, M., Ksaibati, K., and Atadero, R, 2019. Developing a methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of pavement treatments applied to low-volume paved roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (8), 894–904. doi:10.1080/10298436.2017.1356174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignizio, J. P, 2004. Optimal maintenance headcount allocation: An application of Chebyshev goal programming. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (1), 201–210. doi:10.1080/00207540310001603747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irfan, M., et al., 2012. Establishing optimal project-level strategies for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation – A framework and case study. Engineering Optimization, 44 (5), 565–589. doi:10.1080/0305215X.2011.588226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jani, S, 2007. Road asset valuation and management - case study Finland. International Seminar on Sustainable Road Financing and Investment. April 16-20, 2007, Arusha, Tanzania.
   Google Scholar
• Jesus, M., et al., 2011. Network-level optimization of pavement maintenance renewal strategies. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 25 (4), 699–712. doi:10.1016/j.aei.2011.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D, 2011. A practical weight sensitivity algorithm for goal and multiple objective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 213 (1), 238–245. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., et al., 2016. An extended goal programming methodology for analysis of a network encompassing multiple objectives and stakeholders. European Journal of Operational Research, 255 (3), 845–855. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., and Tamiz, M, 2010. Practical goal programming. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Labi, S., and Sinha, K.C, 2005. Life-cycle evaluation of flexible pavement preventive maintenance. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131 (10), 744–751. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:10(744)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamptey, G., et al., 2010. Systematic framework for incorporating safety in network-level transportation planning and programming. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (5), 436–447. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000070
   Google Scholar
• Lamptey, G., Labi, S., and Li, Z, 2008. Decision support for optimal scheduling of highway pavement preventive maintenance within resurfacing cycle. Decision Support Systems, 46 (1), 376–387. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and Madanat, S, 2015. Jointly optimal policies for pavement maintenance, resurfacing and reconstruction. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics, 4 (1), 75–95. doi:10.1007/s13676-014-0065-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Liu, C., and Ding, L, 2013. Impact of pavement condition on crash severity. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 59, 399–406. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and Sinha, K.C, 2004. Methodology for multicriteria decision making in highway asset management. Transportation Research Record, 1885 (1), 79–87. doi:10.3141/1885-12
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., and Sinha, K.C, 2009. Methodology for the determination of relative weights of highway asset management system goals and of performance measures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 15 (2), 95–105. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2009)15:2(95)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Xie, W., and Haas, R, 1996. Reliability-based processing of Markov chains for modeling pavement network deterioration. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1524, 203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Long, K., et al., 2014. Quantitative relationship between crash risk and pavement skid resistance. Report FHWA/TX-13/0-6713-1. Austin, TX: Center for Transportation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Madanat, S., Park, S., and Kuhn, K, 2006. Adaptive optimization and systematic probing of infrastructure system maintenance policies under model uncertainty. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12 (3), 192–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, K.M., Julian, F., and Taylor Jr, H.W, 2006. Good practices: incorporating safety into resurfacing and restoration projects (No. FHWA-SA-07-001). United States: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Mayora, José M. Pardillo, and Piña, Rafael Jurado, 2009. An assessment of the skid resistance effect on traffic safety under wet-pavement conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 41 (4), 881–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbwana, J.R., and Turnquist, M.A, 1996. Optimization modeling for enhanced network-level pavement management system. Transportation Research Record, 1524 (1), 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, R., Flintsch, G., and de León Izeppi, E., 2021. Impact of skid resistance on dry and wet weather crashes. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Part B: Pavements, 147 (3), 04021029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, S., and Ferreira, A, 2015. Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (7), 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseri, H., Fani, A., and Golroo, A, 2020. Toward equity in large-scale network-level pavement maintenance and rehabilitation scheduling using water cycle and genetic algorithms. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1790558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEOS server. 2021. Wisconsin Institute of Discovery, University of Wisconsin in Madison, Wisconsin. [online] Available from: https://neos-server.org/neos/ [Accessed July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Nunoo, C., and Mrawira, D, 2004. Shuffled complex evolution algorithms in infrastructure works programming. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18 (3), 257–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareto, V, 1906. Societa Editrice Libraria, Milan. Trans. Schwier, A. S. A. M. Kelley, New York..
   Google Scholar
• Pasupathy, R., Labi, S., and Sinha, K.C, 2007. Optimal reconstruction period for stochastically deteriorating infrastructure. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 22 (6), 389–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porras-Alvarado, J.D., 2016. A methodological framework for cross-asset resource allocations to support infrastructure management. Thesis (Ph.D.), The University of Texas at Austin, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Uría, M., et al., 2002. Meta-goal programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 136 (2), 422–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C, 2001. Extended lexicographic goal programming: a unifying approach. Omega, 29 (1), 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C, 2004. A general structure of achievement function for a goal programming model. European Journal of Operational Research, 153 (3), 675–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, C., Tamiz, M., and Jones, D. F, 1998. Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: linkages and utility interpretations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49 (9), 986–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R.E, 2007. GAMS – A user’s guide. GAMS Development Corporation, Washington D.C., USA. [online] Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/mdg_workshops/training_material/gams_users_guide.pdf [Accessed: June 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Santos, J., et al., 2019. SUP&r DSS: A sustainability-based decision support system for road pavements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 524–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J., and Ferreira, A, 2013. Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (1), 71–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sindi, W., and Agbelie, B, 2020. Assignments of pavement treatment options: genetic algorithms versus mixed-integer programming. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Part B: Pavements, 146 (2), 04020008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, K. C., Muthusubramanyam, M., and Ravindran, A, 1981. Optimization approach for allocation of funds for maintenance and preservation of the existing highway system. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board, No. 826, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC., 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Stampley, B. E., et al., 1995. Pavement management information system concepts, equations, and analysis models. Report No. TX-96/1989-1, Texas Transportation Institute and Texas Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., et al., 2020. Multiobjective optimization for pavement network maintenance and rehabilitation programming: a case study in Shanghai, China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 1–11. doi:10.1155/2020/3109156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Machí, C., et al., 2014. An iterative approach for the optimization of pavement maintenance management at the network level. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2014/524329.
   Google Scholar
• Torres-Machi, C., et al., 2017. Towards a sustainable optimization of pavement maintenance programs under budgetary restrictions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TxDOT, 2017a. 4-year Pavement Management Plan (FY 2019 – FY 2022) Analysis Report. 4-Year Pavement Management Plan Work Group, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT).
   Google Scholar
• TxDOT, 2017b. Pavement Management Information System. Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Available from: https://ftp.txdot.gov/pub/txdot/mtd/pmis-annual-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• TxDOT, 2017c. Unified Transportation Program, Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). Available from: http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/tpp/utp/2017/utp-2017.pdf [Accessed July 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Viner, H.E., Sinhal, R., and Parry, A.R., 2005. May. Linking road traffic accidents with skid resistance–recent UK developments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Surface Friction.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K.C., and Zaniewski, J.P, 1996. 20/30 hindsight: the new pavement optimization in the Arizona state highway network. Interfaces, 26 (3), 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K.C.P, Zaniewski, J., and Way, G, 1994. Probabilistic behaviour of pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 120 (3), 358–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Zhang, Z., and Machemehl, R.B, 2003. Decision-making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Transportation Research Record, 1853 (1), 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., et al., 2012. Framework for multiobjective optimization of physical highway assets investments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (12), 1411–1421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., and Flintsch, G.W., 2007. A network-level optimization model for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation programming. In Fifth International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements and Technological Control (MAIREPAV5) University of Iowa, Iowa City.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., and Flintsch, G.W, 2009. Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135 (5), 305–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., Flintsch, G.W., and Chowdhury, T, 2008. Hybrid multi objective optimization model for regional pavement-preservation resource allocation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2084, 28–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin, B., et al., 2018. Interactive multiobjective optimization: A review of the state-of-the-art. IEEE Access, 6, 41256–41279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamany, M.S., et al., 2020. Characterizing the performance of interstate flexible pavements using artificial neural networks and random parameters regression. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26 (2), 04020010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., and Garcia-Diaz, A, 2008. Cost-effective selection and multi-period scheduling of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. Engineering Optimization, 40 (3), 205–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar