Road subsurface distress recognition method using multiattribute feature fusion with ground penetrating radar

References

• Aggelis, D. G., Shiotani, T., and Polyzos, D, 2009. Characterization of surface crack depth and repair evaluation using Rayleigh waves. Cement and Concrete Composites, 31 (1), 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, Imad L., et al., 2010. Data analysis techniques for GPR used for assessing railroad ballast in high radio-frequency environment. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (4), 392–399.
   Google Scholar
• Bachar, Al Hakim, Cheung, Lam Wah, and Armitage, Robert J., 1999. Use of FWD data for prediction of bonding between pavement layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1 (1), 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bei Zhang, Jianyang Liu, Zhong, Yanhui, et al., 2021. A BP neural network method for grade classification of loose damage in semirigid pavement bases. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 6658235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetto, A., et al., 2017. An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections. Signal Processing, 132, 201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, Wenda, et al., 2020. Multi-frequency GPR data fusion and its application in NDT. NDT & E International, 115, 102289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford, J. H., and Wu, Y, 2007. Instantaneous spectral analysis; time-frequency mapping via wavelet matching with application to contaminated-site characterization by 3D GPR. The Leading Edge, 26 (8), 1018–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., and Sidney, S, 1997. Seismic attribute technology for reservoir forecasting and monitoring. leading edge (tulsa, Okla.), 16 (5), 445–450.
   Google Scholar
• Christopher D., Lippitt, and Su, Zhang, 2008. The impact of small unmanned airborne platforms on passive optical remote sensing: a conceptual perspective. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 39 (15-16), 4852–4868.
   Google Scholar
• Conyers, L. B., and Leckebusch, J, 2010. Geophysical archaeology Research agendas for the future: some ground-penetrating radar examples. Archaeological Prospection, 17 (2), 117–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbeanu, Rucsandra M., et al., 2002. Prediction of 3-D fluid permeability and mudstone distributions from ground-penetrating radar (GPR) attributes: Example from the cretaceous ferron sandstone member, east-central utah. Geophysics, 67 (5), 1495–1504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, S., and Hoegh, K, 2017. 3D step frequency GPR Asphalt pavement stripping detection: Case study evaluating filtering approaches, 2017 9th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR) (1–7). doi:10.1109/IWAGPR.2017.7996031.
   Google Scholar
• Dou, Qingxu, et al., 2017. Real-Time hyperbola recognition and fitting in GPR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55 (1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, C., et al., 2016. Research of fusion method of GPR tomography images based on wavelet transform, 2016 16th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) (1-6). doi:10.1109/ICGPR.2016.7572666.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, F. M., and Pais, J. C, 2017. Laboratory observation of cracks in road pavements with GPR. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 1130–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., Wang, F., and Zhong, Y, 2016. Assessing pavement interfacial bonding condition. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., and Jing, Z, 2007. Evaluation of focus measures in multi-focus image fusion. Pattern Recognition Letters, 28 (4), 493–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hugenschmidt, J., and Kalogeropoulos, A, 2009. The inspection of retaining walls using GPR. JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 67 (4), 335–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Man-Sung, et al., 2020. Deep learning-based automated underground cavity detection using three-dimensional ground penetrating radar. Structural Health Monitoring, 19 (1), 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazanovich, L., Velasquez, R., and Nesvijski, E, 2005. Evaluation of Top-down cracks in asphalt pavements by using a self-calibrating ultrasonic technique. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1940, 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kofman, L., Ronen, A., and Frydman, S, 2006. Detection of model voids by identifying reverberation phenomena in GPR records. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 59 (4), 284–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalenko, V., Yarovoy, A., and Ligthart, L. P, 2007. Polarimetric feature fusion in GPR for landmine detection IEEE30-33. doi:10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4422722.
   Google Scholar
• Krysiński, L., and Sudyka, J, 2013. Gpr abilities in investigation of the pavement transversal cracks. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 97, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, Z., and Al-Qadi, I. L, 2014. An innovative method for measuring pavement dielectric constant using the extended CMP method with two air-coupled GPR systems. NDT & E International, 66, 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Guoze, et al., 2020. Multi-frequency and multi-attribute GPR data fusion based on 2-D wavelet transform. Measurement, 166, 108243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochales, T., et al., 2008. Detection of underground cavities by combining gravity, magnetic and ground penetrating radar surveys: a case study from the zaragoza area, NE Spain. Environmental Geology, 53 (5), 1067–1077.
   Google Scholar
• Moysey, S., Knight, R. J., and Jol, H. M, 2006. Texture-based classification of ground-penetrating radar images. Geophysics, 71 (6), K111–K118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan, T. Q., Shivakumara, P., and Tan, C. L, 2009. A Laplacian Method for Video Text Detection IEEE66-70. doi:10.1109/ICDAR.2009.153.
   Google Scholar
• Rasol, Mezgeen A., et al., 2020. Gpr laboratory tests and numerical models to characterize cracks in cement concrete specimens, exemplifying damage in rigid pavement. Measurement, 158, 107662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarenketo, T., and Scullion, T, 2000. Road evaluation with ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 43 (2), 119–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solla, M., et al., 2014. Approach to identify cracking in asphalt pavement using GPR and infrared thermographic methods: preliminary findings. NDT & E International, 62, 55–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todkar, Shreedhar Savant, et al., 2019. Performance assessment of SVM-based classification techniques for the detection of artificial debondings within pavement structures from stepped-frequency A-scan radar data. NDT & E International, 107, 102128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, Z., Gao, J., and Yuan, D, 2020. Advances of deep learning applications in ground-penetrating radar: A survey. Construction and Building Materials, 258, 120371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, Vidhi, et al., 2019. Application of infrared thermography for debonding detection in asphalt pavements. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 9 (3), 325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, Jianping, and Liu, Lanbo, 2015. Multi-Frequency GPR signal fusion using forward and inverse S-Transform for detecting railway Subgrade Defects. 2015 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR).
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Xingxin, et al., 2010. Gpr detection of several common subsurface voids inside dikes and dams. Engineering Geology, 111 (1-4), 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Xianlei, et al., 2019. Fusion of multiple time-domain GPR datasets of different center frequencies. Near Surface Geophysics, 17, 141–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, C, Feng, Y, Li, X, et al., 2021. Multi-polarization data fusion analysis of full-polarimetric ground penetrating radar. Journal of Radar, 10 (1), 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Roger A., et al., 1997. 3-D dip filtering and coherence applied to GPR data: A study. The Leading Edge, 16 (6), 921–928.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Xiaoxian, McMechan, George A., and Xu, Tong, 2000. Synthesis of amplitude-versus-offset variations in ground-penetrating radar data. Geophysics, 65 (1), 113–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, W., et al., 2006. Classification of ground penetrating radar echo signals using wavelet packet and RBFIEEE5. doi:10.1109/RADAR.2006.1631836.
   Google Scholar