An approach to investigate the supplementary inconsistency between time series data for predicting road pavement performance models

References

• AASHTO, 2001. Pavement management guide. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2012. Pavement management guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., 2016a. Simplified staged-homogeneous Markov model for flexible pavement performance prediction. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 17 (2), 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., 2016b. Back-calculation of transition probabilities for Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2014.993185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaswadko, N., 2016. Deterioration modelling of granular pavements for rural arterial roads. Thesis (PhD), December, 2016, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Alaswadko, N., et al., 2019a. Probabilistic prediction models for crack initiation and progression of spray sealed pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaswadko, N., et al., 2019b. Modelling roughness progression of sealed granular pavements: A New approach. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (2), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaswadko, N. and Hassan, R., 2016. Rutting progression models for light duty pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2016.1155123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaswadko, N. and Hassan, R., 2020. The performance evaluation of heavy and light duty pavements in Victoria/Australia. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2020.1784893.
   Google Scholar
• Alaswadko, N., Hassan, R., and Mohammed, B., 2017. Multilevel modelling of rutting progression for Low volume roads. RTR, Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New Zealand Research and Practice, 26 (2). https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=024886407636418;res=IELNZC.
   Google Scholar
• Alatoom, Y.I. and Al-Suleiman, T.I., (Obaidat) 2021. Development of pavement roughness models using Artificial Neural Network (ANN). International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2021.1968396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alburquerque, F. and Peres Nuñez, W., 2011. Development of roughness prediction models for low-volume road networks in northeast Brazil. Transportation Research Record, 2205, 198–205.
   Google Scholar
• Alyami, Z., et al., 2019. A dynamic optimal model for pavement asset management and PPP projects. In: Pavement and Asset Management: Proceedings of the World Conference on Pavement and Asset Management (WCPAM 2017). CRC Press, 175.
   Google Scholar
• Archilla, A. and Madanat, S, 2000. Development of a pavement rutting model from experimental data. The Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126(4). DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2000)126:4(291).
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, J., et al., 2015. Analysis of the evolution of flexible pavement conditions based on LTPP SPS-5 sections. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, M. and Aguiar, G., 2010. Impact of climate change on road performance: Updating climate information for Australia. Institution. Austroads Publication No. AP-R358-10. Austroads, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Choummanivong, L. and Martin, T., 2014. Interim road deterioration cracking model during accelerated deterioration. Austroads Publication No. AP-T259-14, Austroads, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Christofa, E.M. and Madanat, S.M., 2010. Development of pavement crack initiation models by combining experimental and field data. Paper No. 10-1096, 89th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, A., 2018. Guide to traffic impact assessment practice note: pavement impact assessment. State of Queensland (Department of Transport and Main Roads), Version 1.0, December 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Donev, V. and Hoffmann, M., 2020. Optimization of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation activities, timing and work zones for short survey sections and multiple distress types. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (5), 583–607. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2018.1502433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fani, A., et al., 2020. Pavement maintenance and rehabilitation planning optimization under budget and pavement deterioration uncertainty. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2020.1748628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, G., 2012. Multiple regression. Swinburne University of Technology, School of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of life and social sciences, HMA279/HAYG423, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Aguiar-Moya, J.P., and Zhang, Z., 2011. Bayesian analysis of heterogeneity in modeling of pavement fatigue cracking. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26, 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giummarra, G.J., et al., 2007. Establishing deterioration models for local roads in Australia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1989, 270–276.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, W., 2004. Interpreting estimated parameters and measuring individual heterogeneity in random coefficient models. New York, NY: Department of Economics, Stern School of Business, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., and Zaniewski, J.P., 1994. Modern pavement management. Malabar, FL: Krieger Published Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, R., 2015. Modelling bituminous surfacing distress data using logistic regression. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 146, 435–446.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, R., Lin, O., and Thananjeyan, A., 2015. Probabilistic modelling of flexible pavement distresses for network management. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–12. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2015.1065989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning, T.F., 2008. The development of pavement deterioration models on the state highway network of New Zealand. Ph.D. Thesis, Research Space at Auckland University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, T.F.P. and Roux, D.C., 2012. A probabilistic approach for modelling deterioration of asphalt surfaces. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering, 54 (2), 36–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HLM8, 2019. HLM8 for Windows [Computer software] by Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S, & Congdon, R., Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc. [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F., 2007. Modeling heterogeneity in transportation infrastructure deterioration: application to pavement. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F. and Prozzi, J., 2010. Roughness model accounting for heterogeneity based on in-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 205–213. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:3(205).
   Google Scholar
• Hwayyis, K., Hassan, R., and Fahey, M.T., 2019. Modelling long-term performance of asphalt surfaces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2019.1652300.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, G. and ARRB-Group, 2008. Guide to pavement technology: Part 2: pavement structural design. Institution. 1921329513. Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Jameson, G., 2012. Guide to pavement technology: part 2: Pavement structural design. Austroads Publication No. AGPT02-12, Austroads, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Khraibani, H., et al., 2012. Nonlinear mixed-effects model for the evaluation and prediction of pavement deterioration. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (2), 149–156. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L. and Gharaibeh, N., 2014. Bayesian model for predicting the performance of pavements treated with thin hot-mix asphalt overlays. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2431, 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llopis-Castelló, D., et al., 2020. Influence of pavement structure, traffic, and weather on urban flexible pavement deterioration. Sustainability, 12 (22), 9717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorino, T., et al., 2012. Modeling the road degradation process: non-linear mixed effects models for correlation and heteroscedasticity of pavement longitudinal data. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, P., 2011. Modeling pavement performance and preservation. Ph.D. Thesis, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota.
   Google Scholar
• Lytton, R.L., 1987. Concepts of pavement performance prediction and modeling. Proceedings 2nd North American Conference on Managing Pavements, Public Roads, Volume 2, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T., Choummanivong, L., and Toole, T., 2011. A new pavement deterioration models for sealed low volume roads in Australia. Eighth International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, November 15-19, 2011, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Menendez, J.R. and Gharaibeh, N.G., 2017. Incorporating risk and uncertainty into infrastructure asset management plans for pavement networks. Journal Infrastructure System, 23, 1–7. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, A., Amador-Jimenez, L., and Elsaid, F., 2019. Simplified pavement performance modeling with only two-time series observations: a case study of Montreal Island. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B Pavements. DOI:10.1061/JPEODX.0000138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, B., 2016. Improving the estimation f agency cost associated with increasing axle mass limits. Thesis (PhD), December, 2016, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, A.V., et al., 2017. Coordination of user and agency costs using two-level approach for pavement management optimization. Transportation Research Record, 2639, 110–118. DOI:10.3141/2639-14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubaraki, M., 2010. Predicting deterioration for the Saudi Arabia urban road network. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Mulandi, J., et al., 2007. Roughness progression on KDOT asphalt pavements. Kansas Department of Transportation Bureau of Materials and Research, Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-02-5.
   Google Scholar
• Nobakht, M., et al., 2016. Mechanistic-empirical methodology for the selection of cost-effective rehabilitation strategy for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI:10.1080/10298436.2016.1199878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omokri, P., 2015. Effects of transformations on significance of the Pearson T-Test. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 11 (3), 69–72. e-ISSN: 2278-5728, p-ISSN: 2319-765X.
   Google Scholar
• Onar, A., et al., 2006. Statistical mixed effects models for evaluation and prediction of accelerated pavement testing results. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132 (10), 771–780. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006).
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2018. Research trends in pavement management during the first years of the 21st century: A bibliometric analysis during the 2000–2013 periods. Applied Sciences, 8 (7), 1041.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2019. Rigid pavement performance models by means of Markov chains with half-year step time. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (7), 830–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2020. IRI performance models for flexible pavement in two-lane roads until first maintenance and/or rehabilitation work. Coatings, 10 (2), 97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Acebo, H., et al., 2021. Modeling the international roughness index performance on semi-rigid pavements in single carriageway roads. Construction and Building Materials, 272, 121665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prozzi, J.A., 2001. Modeling pavement performance by combining field and experimental data. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Prozzi, J.A. and Madanat, S.M., 2004. Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10 (1), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Qamhia, I.I.A., et al., 2019. Implementation framework of the UIUC aggregate base rutting model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (10), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, Z., et al., 2017. Aggregate fatigue failure on macro texture polishing of asphalt pavement. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 11, 176–184.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S.W. and Bryk, A.S., 2002. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Salama, H.K., Chatti, K., and Lyles, R.W., 2006. Effect of heavy multiple axle trucks on flexible pavement damage using in-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132 (10), 763–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, R., 2012. Impact of changes in fleet composition and axle loading on pavement profile characteristics. Master Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• SPSS, 2020. IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Version 27.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, O.K.P., 2010. The development of a pavement deterioration model for estimating the pavement condition index for composite pavement in Washington DC. Master Thesis, Howard University.
   Google Scholar
• Sunitha, V., et al., 2012. Cluster-based pavement deterioration models for low-volume rural roads. ISRN Civil Engineering, 2012, Article ID 565948, 8 Pages. DOI:10.5402/2012/565948.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, O., and Sobanjo, J., 2013. Comparison of Markov chain and semi-Markov models for crack deterioration on flexible pavements. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19, 186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toole, T., et al., 2009. Guide to asset management Part 5H: performance modelling. Austroads Publication No. AGAM05H-09, Austroads, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin, S.M., 2006. Pavement management system. In: T.F. Fwa, ed. The handbook of highway engineering. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 18-10–18-70.
   Google Scholar
• VicRoads, 2009. Technical bulletin No. 50 – guide to surface inspection rating for pavements surfaced with sprayed seals and asphalt. Kew, Melbourne, Australia: VicRoads.
   Google Scholar
• VicRoads, 2013. Selection and design of pavements and surfacings. Kew, Melbourne, Australia: Vicroads.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., 2013. Ordinal logistic regression model for predicting AC overlay cracking. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 27 (3), 346–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuensch, K.L., 2014. Binary logistic regression with SPSS. Logistic-SPSS.docx, http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/MV/multReg/Logistic-SPSS.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Zouch, M., et al., 2012. Application of a bivariate deterioration model for a pavement management optimization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 48, 196–204. Transport Research Arena.
   Google Scholar