Application of percent within limits concepts on a balanced mix design of asphalt mixtures

References

• AASHTO, 2018a. AASHTO T 340 determining rutting susceptibility of hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2018b. AASHTO R 9 standard practice for acceptance sampling plans for highway construction. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2019. AASHTO M 323 superpave volumetric mix design. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2020. AASHTO TP 124 determining the fracture potential of asphalt mixtures using semicircular bend geometry (SCB) at intermediate temperature. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Advanced Asphalt Technologies, LLC, 2011. NCHRP Report 673: a manual for design of hot mix asphalt with commentary. Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L., et al., 2015. Testing protocols to ensure performance of high asphalt binder replacement mixes using RAP and RAS. Illinois Center for Transportation, No. FHWA-ICT-15-017.
   Google Scholar
• ARDOT, 2014. Standard specifications for highway construction.
   Google Scholar
• Army Corps of Engineers and Federal Aviation Administration, 2000. Hot-mix asphalt paving handbook 2000. No. 0309071577.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, M.K., 2016. An analysis of impact factors on the Illinois flexibility index test. Thesis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Bonaquist, R., 2014. Impact of mix design on asphalt pavement durability. Transportation Research E-Circular, E-C186.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, S., 2016. AAPT symposium: optimized mix design approach- contractor’s perspective. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 90, 819–837.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Camarena, E.A. and Hall, K.D., 2020. “Simplified” cracking tests: evaluation of the IDEAL-CT performed using a marshall testing platform. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 99th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, D.W. and Bonaquist, R.F., 2006. NCHRP Report 567: volumetric requirements for superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Epps, J.A., et al., 2002. NCHRP report 455: recommended performance-related specification for hot-mix asphalt construction: results of the WesTrack project. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K.D., Castillo-Camarena, E.A., and Parnell, N., 2019. TRC1802 implementation report: performance-based asphalt mixture design (PBD) for Arkansas. Arkansas Department of Transportation, University of Arkansas, No. TRC-1802.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K.D., Parnell, N., and Castillo-Camarena, E.A., 2020. Evaluation of SCB/I-FIT testing for implementation into performance engineered asphalt mixture design in Arkansas. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 99th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K.D. and Williams, S.G., 2002. Establishing variability for hot-mix asphalt construction in Arkansas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1813, 172–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C.S., 2005. NCHRP synthesis 346: state construction quality assurance programs. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P.S. and Cooley, L.A., 2003. NCHRP report 508: accelerated laboratory rutting tests evaluation of the asphalt pavement analyzer. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, No. 0309087759 9780309087759.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D.C., 2012. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council and Transportation Research Board, 2013. Glossary of transportation construction quality assurance terms. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Ozer, H., et al., 2016. Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters. Construction and Building Materials, 115 (Supplement C), 390–401.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, F. and Hossain, S., 2002. Statistics for superpave hot-mix asphalt construction quality control/quality assurance data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1813, 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Richey, A., 2017. Using historic pavement performance data to identify and select sites for asphalt mixture design studies. Civil engineering undergraduate honors thesis. University of Arkansas.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera-Perez, J., et al., 2018. Impact of specimen configuration and characteristics on Illinois flexibility index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672 (28), 11p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strategic Highway Research Program, 1994. Fatigue response of asphalt-aggregate mixes. Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.D., et al., 2019. Development of a performance-volumetric relationship for asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (6), 0361198119845364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S.G., 2017. Study of design air voids in Arkansas asphalt mixtures. Arkansas: Arkansas Department of Transportation, ARDOT.
   Google Scholar
• Zdenek, P.B. and Pere, C.P., 1988. Effect of temperature and humidity on fracture energy of concrete. Materials Journal, 85 (4), 262–271.
   Google Scholar