A semi-analytical random shakedown solution for pavements with spatial variability

References

• Aboustit, Baher Labeeb, 1979. Finite element linear programming approach to foundation shakedown. Thesis (PhD). Memorial University of Newfoundland.
   Google Scholar
• Aguiar-Moya, J. P., and Prozzi, J., 2011. Development of reliable pavement models. Texas: Southwest Region University Transportation Center (US).
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Ang, A. H. S., and Tang, W. H., 2007. Probability concepts in engineering: emphasis on applications in civil and environmental engineering. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Baecher, G. B., and Christian, J. T., 2005. Reliability and statistics in geotechnical engineering. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Binesh, S. M., and Gholampour, A., 2015. Mesh-free lower bound limit analysis. International Journal of Computational Methods, 12 (01), 1350105.
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgpour, M. H., Binesh, S. M., and Rahmani, R., 2021. Probabilistic stability analysis of geo-structures in anisotropic clayey soils with spatial variability. Computers and Geotechnics, 133, 104044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. F., et al., 2012. Validation experiments for lower-bound shakedown theory applied to layered pavement systems. Géotechnique, 62 (10), 923–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, I. F., Wang, A. P., and Saunders, L. R., 1993. Shakedown in layered pavements under moving surface loads. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 17 (3), 165–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P. A., Lopes, P., and Cardoso, A. S., 2018. Soil shakedown analysis of slab railway tracks: numerical approach and parametric study. Transportation Geotechnics, 16, 85–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. W., 1987. Production of conditional simulations via the LU triangular decomposition of the covariance matrix. Mathematical Geology, 19 (2), 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, G. A., and Griffiths, D. V., 2008. Risk assessment in geotechnical engineering. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jamshidi Chenari, R., and Alaie, R., 2015. Effects of anisotropy in correlation structure on the stability of an undrained clay slope. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards, 9 (2), 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. L., 1985. Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karki, A., 2017. Development of simplified framework for reliability analysis of flexible pavement using mechanistic empirical pavement design guide. Thesis (PhD). University of Akron.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, K., Halder, K., and Chakraborty, D., 2021. Probabilistic shakedown analysis of cohesive soil under moving surface loads considering wheel-soil interface friction. Road Materials and Pavement Design. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2021.1888777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. X., and Yu, H. S., 2006. A nonlinear programming approach to kinematic shakedown analysis of frictional materials. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43, 6594–6614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., et al., 2016. Shakedown solutions for pavements with materials following associated and non-associated plastic flow rules. Computers and Geotechnics, 78, 218–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., et al., 2020. Shakedown of asphalt pavements considering temperature effect. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2020.1812068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., and Wang, J., 2019. Application of shakedown theory in track substructure design. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Ground Improvement, 172 (2), 116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumb, P., 1970. Safety factors and the probability distribution of soil strength. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 7, 225–242.
   Google Scholar
• Melan, E., 1938. Zur plastizitat des raumlichen kontinuums. Ingenieur-Archiv, 9, 116–126.
   Google Scholar
• Mo, P. Q., and Wang, J., 2020. Shakedown analysis of cavities in cohesive-frictional materials and its application to underground energy storage caverns. Soils and Foundations, 60 (1), 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, J., et al., 2019. The influence of traffic moving speed on shakedown limits of flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (2), 233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, J., Dai, Y., and Huang, M., 2020. Dynamic shakedown analysis of two-layered pavement under rolling-sliding contact. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 129, 105958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radovsky, B. S., and Murashina, N. V., 1996. Shakedown of subgrade soil under repeated loading. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1547 (1), 82–88.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani, R., and Binesh, S. M., 2020. Mesh-free shakedown analysis of cohesive-frictional pavement under moving traffic loads: deterministic and probabilistic frameworks. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (4), 1096–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retherford, J. Q., and McDonald, M., 2010. Reliability methods applicable to mechanistic–empirical pavement design method. Transportation Research Record, 2154 (1), 130–137.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, A., Babu, G. L. S., and Haldar, S., 2010. Influence of spatial variability of permeability property on steady state seepage flow and slope stability analysis. Engineering Geology, 110 (3–4), 93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Army Corps of Engineers, 1995. Introduction to probability and reliability methods for use in geotechnical engineering. Technical Letter No. 1110-2-547. Washington, DC: US Army Corps of Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Vanmarcke, E. H., 1984. Random fields, analysis and synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vetterling, W. T., et al., 2002. Numerical recipes in C++: the art of scientific computing (2nd ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, H., 1998. Multivariate geostatistics: an introduction with applications. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., 2011. Shakedown analysis and design of flexible road pavements under moving surface loads. Thesis (PhD). The University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and Yu, H. S., 2013a. Residual stresses and shakedown in cohesive-frictional half-space under moving surface loads. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 8 (1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., and Yu, H. S., 2014. Three-dimensional shakedown solutions for anisotropic cohesive-frictional materials under moving surface loads. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 38 (4), 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. S., 2005. Three-dimensional analytical solutions for shakedown of cohesive-frictional materials under moving surface loads. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 461 (2059), 1951–1964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, H. S., 2007. Plasticity and geotechnics (Vol. 13). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, H. S., and Wang, J., 2012. Three-dimensional shakedown solutions for cohesive-frictional materials under moving surface loads. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 49 (26), 3797–3807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yucemen, M. S., Tang, W. H., and Ang, A. H. S., 1973. A probabilistic study of safety and design of earth slopes. Urbana: University of Illinois. Civil engineering studies, structural research series, (Vol. 402).
   Google Scholar
• Zhuang, Y., and Wang, K., 2018. Shakedown solutions for pavement structures with von mises criterion subjected to Hertz loads. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (3), 710–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar