Recycled plastics as synthetic coarse and fine asphalt aggregate

References

• AASHTO, 2001. AASHTO provisional standards: interim edition. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Northwest.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2018. AASHTO T 324-17. Standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted asphalt mixes. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Northwest, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• AG:PT/T232, 2007. Stripping potential of asphalt – tensile strength ratio. Austroads Manual of Test Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadinia, E., et al., 2011. Using waste plastic bottles as additive for stone mastic asphalt. Materials & Design, 32 (10), 4844–4849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadinia, E., et al., 2012. Performance evaluation of utilization of waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 984–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AS 2008-2013, 2013. Bitumen for pavements. Standard Australia.
   Google Scholar
• AS/NZS (Australian/New Zealand Standard), 2014a. Methods of sampling and testing asphalt. Part 1: Sample preparation – mixing, quatering and conditioning of asphalt in the laboratory. AS/NZS 2891.2.1. Sydney, Australia: AS/NZS.
   Google Scholar
• AS/NZS (Australian/New Zealand Standard), 2014b. Methods of sampling and testing asphalt. Part 2: Sample preparation – compaction of asphalt test specimens using a gyratory compactor. AS/NZS 2891.2.2:2014, Sydney, Australia: AS/NZS.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2019. “D8225 − 19. Standard test method for determination of cracking tolerance index of asphalt mix using the indirect tensile cracking test at intermediate temperature.” ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2021. “D8237 − 21. Standard test method for determining fatigue failure of asphalt-aggregate mixtures with the four-point beam fatigue device.” ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Audy, R., et al., 2022. Selection of recycled waste plastic for incorporation in sustainable asphalt pavements: a novel multi-criteria screening tool based on 31 sources of plastic. Science of the Total Environment, 829, 154604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2008. A review of Austroads gyratory compaction research. Sydney, NSW: Austroads. APT-T94-08.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2016. AGPT/T274. Characterisation of flexural stiffness and fatigue performance of bituminous mixes.
   Google Scholar
• Biligiri, K P, et al., 2001. Rational modeling of tertiary flow for asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, L. M., et al., 2013. Incorporation of waste plastic in asphalt binders to improve their performance in the pavement. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 6 (4), 457–464.
   Google Scholar
• Dalhat, M., and Al-Abdul Wahhab, H., 2017. Performance of recycled plastic waste modified asphalt binder in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (4), 349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalhat, M., Al-Abdul Wahhab, H., and Al-Adham, K., 2019. Recycled plastic waste asphalt concrete via mineral aggregate substitution and binder modification. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31 (8), 04019134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A., Enieb, M., and Singh, D., 2019. Influence of aging on properties of polymer-modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 196, 54–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giustozzi, F., and Boom, Y., 2021. Use of road-grade recycled plastics for sustainable asphalt pavements: overview of the recycled plastic industry and recycled plastic types. Austroads 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Habbouche, J., et al., 2021. Round Robin Testing Program for the indirect tensile cracking test at intermediate temperature: Phase I.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, M. R. M., et al., 2016. A simple treatment of electronic-waste plastics to produce asphalt binder additives with improved properties. Construction and Building Materials, 110, 79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joohari, I. B., and Giustozzi, F., 2020. Chemical and high-temperature rheological properties of recycled plastics-polymer modified hybrid bitumen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 123064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra-González, P., et al., 2016. Comparative analysis of the performance of asphalt concretes modified by dry way with polymeric waste. Construction and Building Materials, 112, 1133–1140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastra-González, P., et al., 2021. Analysis of replacing virgin bitumen by plastic waste in asphalt concrete mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mallick, R. B., et al., 2004. Evaluation of use of synthetic lightweight aggregate in hot-mix asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1891 (1), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Alfonso, J., et al., 2019. Use of plastic wastes from greenhouse in asphalt mixes manufactured by dry process. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (sup1), S265–S281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhailenko, P., et al., 2021. Effect of waste PET and CR as sand replacement on the durability and effect of waste PET and CR as sand replacement on the durability and acoustical properties of semi dense asphalt (SDA) mixes. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 29, e00295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddam, T. B., Soltani, M., and Karim, M. R., 2014. Experimental characterization of rutting performance of polyethylene terephthalate modified asphalt mixes under static and dynamic loads. Construction and Building Materials, 65, 487–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizamuddin, S., et al., 2020. Recycled plastic as bitumen modifier: The role of recycled linear low-density polyethylene in the modification of physical, chemical and rheological properties of bitumen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 266, 121988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizamuddin, S., Boom, Y. J., and Giustozzi, F., 2021. Sustainable polymers from recycled waste plastics and their virgin counterparts as bitumen modifiers: A comprehensive review. Polymers, 13 (19), 3242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, K, 2019. 2017-18 Australian plastics recycling survey – national report. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy [Online]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3a4hoxs.
   Google Scholar
• Padhan, R. K., Sreeram, A., and Gupta, A., 2020. Evaluation of trans-polyoctenamer and cross-linking agents on the performance of waste polystyrene modified asphalt. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (4), 1170–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranieri, M., et al., 2017. Asphalt surface mixes with improved performance using waste polymers via dry and wet processes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (10), 04017169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebbechi, J., and Petho, L., 2014. Guide to pavement technology: part 4B. Asphalt.
   Google Scholar
• VicRoads, 2021. VicRoads Section 407:2021, dense graded asphalt.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., et al., 2018. Development of a framework for balanced mix design. Project NCHRP, 20–07.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, R, Yin, F., and Moreas, R., 2020. Recycled plastics in asphalt Part A: state of the knowledge. NAPA-IS-142 report. National Asphalt Pavement Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, S., and Montalvo, L., 2020. Repurposing waste plastics into cleaner asphalt pavement materials: a critical literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, F., etal, 2014. Novel method for moisture susceptibility and rutting evaluation using hamburg wheel tracking test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2446 (1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3141/2446-01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, P., and Al-Qadi, I., 2014. Pre-and post-peak toughening behaviours of fibre-reinforced hot-mix asphalt mixes. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (2), 122–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar