Mechanistic modelling of grid-reinforced milled-and-overlaid asphalt pavements

References

• AASHTO, 2011. Standard method of test for determining dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt (HMA). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO T 342.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2017. Standard method of test for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO T 378.
   Google Scholar
• ARA Inc., 2004. Guide for mechanical-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. NCHRP.
   Google Scholar
• Arsenie, I.M., et al., 2017. Laboratory characterisation of the fatigue behaviour of a glass fibre grid-reinforced asphalt concrete using 4PB tests. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (1), 168–180. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1163280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asphalt Academy, 2008. TG3 – asphalt reinforcement for road construction. Asphalt, November.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2009. Standard test method for deflections with a falling-weight-type impulse load device.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2020. D6433-20 Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys.
   Google Scholar
• AUSTROADS, 2004. Pavement design: a guide to the structural design of road pavements. In: Deterioration and maintenance of pavements, 233–243. Available from: www.austroads.com.au.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, C., Underwood, B., and Kim, Y., 2012. Effects of oxidative aging on asphalt mixture properties. Transportation Research Record, 2296 (1), 77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, C.A., Wieder, A.J., and Fellin, M.J., 1994. Laboratory aging of asphalt-aggregate mixtures: field validation. Strategic Highway Research Program, 254–262.
   Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1943. The theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems and applications to the design of airport runways. In: Highway Reseach Board: Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting; 27–30 November; Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1945a. The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered soil systems. II. Journal of Applied Physics, 16 (3), 126–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1945b. The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered soil systems. III. Journal of Applied Physics, 16 (5), 296–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burmister, D.M., 1945c. The general theory of stresses and displacements in layered systems. I. Journal of Applied Physics, 16 (2), 89–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, J.W., and Lytton, R.L., 2007. Guidelines for using geosynthetics with hot-mix asphalt overlays to reduce reflective cracking. Transportation Research Record, 2004 (1), 111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Caltrans, 2020. Highway design manual. 7th ed. California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., and Santagata, E., 2005. Temperature effects on the shear behaviour of tack coat emulsions used in flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 6 (1), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• CEN, 2012. Bituminous mixtures – test methods – part 26: stiffness. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), EN 12697-26.
   Google Scholar
• Chabot, A., et al., 2010. ViscoRoute 2.0 A: tool for the simulation of moving load effects on asphalt pavement. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 11 (2), 227–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D.T.T., et al., 1999. Laboratory and case study for geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement overlay. Transportation Research Record, 1687 (1), 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., and Thom, N.H., 2012. Discrete element modelling of cyclic loads of geogrid-reinforced ballast under confined and unconfined conditions. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 35, 76–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., McDowell, G.R., and Thom, N.H., 2014. Investigating geogrid-reinforced ballast: experimental pull-out tests and discrete element modelling. Soils and Foundations, 54 (1), 1–11. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2013.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, G.S., Button, J.W., and Lytton, R.L., 2001. Geosynthetics in flexible and rigid pavement. Fhwa/Tx-02/1777- 1, 7 (2). Available from: http://www.scribd.com/doc/136341942/Geosynthetics-in-Flexible-and-Rigid-Pavementscribd.
   Google Scholar
• Collop, A.C., and Cebon, D., 1996. Stiffness reductions of flexible pavements due to cumulative fatigue damage. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 122 (2), 131–139.
   Google Scholar
• Correia, N.S., and Zornberg, J.G., 2016. Mechanical response of flexible pavements enhanced with geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays. Geosynthetics International, 23 (3), 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia, N.S., and Zornberg, J.G., 2018. Strain distribution along geogrid-reinforced asphalt overlays under traffic loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 46 (1), 111–120. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bondt, A.H., 1999. Anti-reflective cracking design of (reinforced) asphalt overlays. Thesis (PhD).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 1999. COST 333: development of new bituminous pavement design method: final report of the action. Vol. 18906. European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Germann, F., and Lytton, R., 1979. Methodology for predicting the reflection cracking life of asphalt concrete overlays. Interim Report.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, J.R., and Popov, E.P., 1968. Layered beam systems with interlayer slip. Journal of the Structural Division, 94 (11), 2535–2548.
   Google Scholar
• Graziani, A., et al., 2014. Structural response of grid-reinforced bituminous pavements. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, 47 (8), 1391–1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, F., et al., 2016. Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test. Construction and Building Materials, 122, 214–230. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., and Tsai, B.W., 1997. Long-term oven-aging effects on fatigue and initial stiffness of asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1590 (1), 89–98. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.3141/1590-11.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, E., et al., 2015. Flexible road pavement structural condition benchmark methodology incorporating structural condition indices derived from falling weight deflectometer deflection bowls. Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction, 4 (1), 12.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. Available from: http://docshare04.docshare.tips/files/14013/140138713.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., Hussaini, S.K., and Vinod, J.S., 2012. On the shear behavior of ballast-geosynthetic interfaces. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35 (2), 305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodaii, A., Fallah, S., and Moghadas, F., 2009. Effects of geosynthetics on reduction of reflection cracking in asphalt overlays. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 27 (1), 1–8. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Lee, J., and Lutif, J.E., 2010. Geometrical evaluation and experimental verification to determine representative volume elements of heterogeneous asphalt mixtures. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 38 (6), 660–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konietzky, H., et al., 2004. Use of DEM to model the interlocking effect of geogrids under static and cyclic loading. In:Numerical Modeling in Micromechanics via Particle Methods – 2004, 28–29 October, Kyoto, Japan. London: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kutay, M.E., Hasnat, M., and Levenberg, E., 2020. Layered nonlinear cross anisotropic model for pavements with geogrids. In: Materials and Pavement Performance Prediction II: Contributions to the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Materials and Pavement Performance Prediction (AM3P 2020), 27–29 May, 2020, San Antonio, TX. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, J., and Tutumluer, E., 2009. Geogrid base reinforcement with aggregate interlock and modeling of associated stiffness enhancement in mechanistic pavement analysis. Transportation Research Record, 2116 (1), 85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Le, V.P., et al., 2017. Development of a simple asphalt concrete overlay design scheme based on mechanistic–empirical approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (3), 630–645. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1182059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J.H., et al., 2019. Long-term performance of fiber-grid-reinforced asphalt overlay pavements: a case study of korean national highways. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 6 (4), 366–382. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2018.01.008.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Kim, Y.R., and Lee, J., 2015. Rutting performance evaluation of asphalt mix with different types of geosynthetics using MMLS3. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (10), 894–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leischner, S., et al., 2019. Mechanical testing and modeling of interlayer bonding in HMA pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (11), 879–890. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119843254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaitre, J., and Desmorat, R., 2005. Engineering damage mechanics: ductile, creep, fatigue and brittle failures. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., 2013. Inverse analysis of viscoelastic pavement properties using data from embedded instrumentation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 37 (9), 1016–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., 2015. Backcalculation with an implanted inertial sensor. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2525 (1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., 2016. Viscoelastic pavement modeling with a spreadsheet. In: Eighth International Conference on Maintenance and Rehabilitation of Pavements (MAIREPAV8), 27–29 July, Singapore.Singapore: Research Publishing Services, 746–755.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., 2020. Pavement Mechanics: Lecture Notes. 1st ed. Eyal Levenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., McDaniel, R.S., and Olek, J., 2009. Validation of NCAT structural test track experiment using INDOT APT facility. West Lafayette, Indiana: Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, September.
   Google Scholar
• Levenberg, E., and Skar, A., 2020. Analytic pavement modelling with a fragmented layer. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (4), 1108–1108. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1790559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, M., et al., 2017. Time-temperature-aging-depth shift functions for dynamic modulus master curves of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 157, 943–951. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Indraratna, B., and Rujikiatkamjorn, C., 2021. An analytical model for particle-geogrid aperture interaction. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 49 (1), 41–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, R., et al., 2017. Quantifying the influence of geosynthetics on pavement performance.
   Google Scholar
• Lytton, R.L., 1989. Use of geotextiles for reinforcement and strain relief in asphalt concrete. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 8 (3), 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestas, J.M., and Mamlouk, M.S., 1992. Comparison of pavement deflection analysis methods using overlay design. Transportation Research Record, 1377, 17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud, S.M., Mishra, D., and Potyondy, D.O., 2018. Effect of Geogrid Inclusion on Ballast Resilient Modulus: The Concept of ‘Geogrid Gain Factor’. In: ASME/IEE Joint Rail Conference (JRC 2018), 18–20 April, 2018, Pittsburgh, PA. New York: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Malkin, A.Y., and Isayev, A.I., 2017. Rheology: concepts, methods, and applications. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mamlouk, M.S., et al., 1990. Overlay design method for flexible pavements in Arizona. Transportation Research Record, 1286, 112–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mateos, A., Ayuso, J.P., and Jáuregui, B.C., 2013. Evaluation of structural response of cracked pavements at CEDEX transport research center test track. Transportation Research Record, 2367 (1), 84–94.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell, G.R., et al., 2006. Discrete element modelling of geogrid-reinforced aggregates. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 159 (1), 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MTO, 2013. Pavement design and rehabilitation manual. 2nd ed. Ontario Ministry of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M.L., et al., 2013. Review of glass fibre grid use for pavement reinforcement and APT experiments at IFSTTAR. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (SUPPL.1), 287–308.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., et al., 2020. Fleksible belægninger med asfaltarmering – Mekanisk beregningsmodel. Trafik & Veje.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J., 2021. Analytic analysis of a grid-reinforced asphalt concrete overlay. In: Eleventh International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Volume 1, 27–30 June, 2022, Trondheim, Norway. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, 346–354.
   Google Scholar
• Nithin, S., Rajagopal, K., and Veeraragavan, A., 2015. State-of-the art summary of geosynthetic interlayer systems for retarding the reflective cracking. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 45 (4), 472–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, G.P., Fwa, T.F., and Tan, S.A., 2004. Laboratory evaluation of rutting resistance of geosynthetics reinforced asphalt pavement. Transportation, 44 (2), 29–44.
   Google Scholar
• Pasternak, P.L., 1954. On a new method of an elastic foundation by means of two foundation constants. In: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo Literaturi po Stroitelstuve i Arkhitekture.
   Google Scholar
• Pellinen, T., and Witczak, M.W., 2002. Stress dependent master curve construction for dynamic (complex) modulus. In: Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 18–20 March, 2002, Colorado Springs, CO. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT), 281–309.
   Google Scholar
• Peutz, M.G., Van Kempen, H.P., and Jones, A., 1968. Layered systems under normal surface loads. Highway Research Record, 228.
   Google Scholar
• Potyondy, D., Siekmeier, J., and Petersen, L., 2016. Aggregate-geogrid interaction model incorporating moisture effects.
   Google Scholar
• Romanoschi, S.A., and Metcalf, J.B., 2001. Characterization of asphalt concrete layer interfaces. Transportation Research Record, 1778 (1), 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• Sagnol, L., et al., 2019. Effect of glass fibre grids on the bonding strength between two asphalt layers and its contact dynamics method modelling. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (5), 1164–1181. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2018.1439764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, P.J., 2001. Reinforced asphalt overlays. University of Nottingham, 381, October.
   Google Scholar
• Schapery, R., 1962. Approximate Methods of Transform Inversion for Viscoelastic Stress Analysis. In: Proceedings 4th US National Congress on Applied Mechanics, Berkely, CA, 1075–1085.
   Google Scholar
• Schuettpelz, C., Fratta, D., and Edil, T.B., 2009. Evaluation of the zone of influence and stiffness improvement from geogrid reinforcement in granular materials. Transportation Research Record, 2116 (1), 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Shell, 1978. Shell pavement design manual: asphalt pavements and overlays for road traffic. London, UK: Shell International Petroleum Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, J.F., et al., 1982. Thickness design of asphalt pavements-the asphalt institute method. In: Proceedings, 5th international conference on structural design of asphalt pavements. Vol. 1. The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Siekmeier, J., and Casanova, J., 2016. Geogrid reinforced aggregate base stiffness for mechanistic pavement design. Minnesota Department of Transportation, (2016–24), July.
   Google Scholar
• Skar, A., et al., 2020b. Analysis of a moving measurement platform based on line profile sensors for project-level pavement evaluation. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (9), 1–17. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2020.1741429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skar, A., and Andersen, S., 2020. ALVA: an adaptive MATLAB package for layered viscoelastic analysis. Journal of Open Source Software, 5 (55), 2548.
   Google Scholar
• Skar, A., Andersen, S., and Nielsen, J., 2020a. Adaptive layered viscoelastic analysis (ALVA). Available from: https://github.com/asmusskar/ALVA.
   Google Scholar
• Sobhan, K., 2005. Effects of geosynthetic reinforcement on the propagation of reflection cracking and accumulation of permanent deformation in asphalt overlays. 1–9, June.
   Google Scholar
• Solatiyan, E., Bueche, N., and Carter, A., 2020. A review on mechanical behavior and design considerations for reinforced-rehabilitated bituminous pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 257, Article ID 119483. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S&P Clever Reinforcement Company AG, 2020. S&P Carbophalt® G 200/200. Available from: https://p.widencdn.net/rx8gq5/R_CarbophaltG200200_Pub_Tds_Prod__EN_EN.
   Google Scholar
• S&P Clever Reinforcement Company AG, 2021. S&P Glasphalt® G.
   Google Scholar
• Trafikverket, 2011. Trafikverkets tekniska krav Vägkonstruktion.
   Google Scholar
• Ullidtz, P., 1987. Pavement analysis. Developments in civil engineering, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Ullidtz, P., et al., 2010. CalME, a mechanistic-empirical program to analyze and design flexible pavement rehabilitation. Transportation Research Record, 2153 (1), 143–152.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J., Livneh, M., and Eshed, Y., 1978. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Asphalt Paving Technol, 47, 495–521.
   Google Scholar
• Vejdirektoratet, 2017. Mmopp – Dimensioneringsprogram for vejbefæstelser. Vejregler, 68. September.
   Google Scholar
• Vinay Kumar, V., and Saride, S., 2017. Use of digital image correlation for the evaluation of flexural fatigue behavior of asphalt beams with geosynthetic interlayers. Transportation Research Record, 2631 (1), 55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Weissman, S.L., et al., 1999. Selection of laboratory test specimen dimension for permanent deformation of asphalt concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1681 (1), 113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M.L., Landel, R.F., and Ferry, J.D., 1955. The temperature dependence of relaxation mechanisms in amorphous polymers and other glass-forming liquids. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 77 (14), 3701–3707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, E., 1867. Die Lehre von der Elasticitaet und Festigkeit: mit besonderer Rücksicht auf ihre Anwendung in der Technik, für polytechnische Schulen, Bauakademien, Ingenieure, Maschinenbauer, Architecten, etc. H. Dominicus.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Tang, J., and Liu, H., 2012. Construction of triaxial dynamic modulus master curve for asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 37, 21–26. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zofka, A., Maliszewski, M., and Maliszewska, D., 2017. Glass and carbon geogrid reinforcement of asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18, 471–490. Available from:https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2016.1266775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar