Establishment of probabilistic prediction models for pavement deterioration based on Bayesian neural network

References

• AASHTO, 1993. AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A, 2004. Deterministic performance prediction model for rehabilitation and management of flexible pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 5 (2), 111–121.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A, 2016a. Back-calculation of transition probabilities for Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (3), 253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A, 2016b. Simplified staged-homogenous Markov model for flexible pavement performance prediction. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 17 (2), 365–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A, 2017. Empirical approach for estimating the pavement transition probabilities used in non-homogenous Markov chains. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (2), 130–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., 2021a. Simplified exhaustive search approach for estimating the non-homogeneous transition probabilities for infrastructure asset management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 28 (1), 04021048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A, 2021b. Optimal novel approach for estimating the pavement transition probabilities used in Markovian prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A, 2021c. Empirical-Markovian approach for estimating the flexible pavement structural capacity: caltrans method as a case study. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 10 (2), 156–166.
   Google Scholar
• Abed, A., Thom, N., and Neves, L, 2019. Probabilistic prediction of asphalt pavement performance. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (sup1), S247–S264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alatoom, Y.I., and Al-Suleiman, T.I, 2021. Development of pavement roughness models using artificial neural network (ANN). International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2020. Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys (D6433-20). Philadelphia, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Blundell, C., et al., 2015. Weight uncertainty in neural networks. In: 32nd International conference on machine learning, 2, ICML, 1613–1622.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J.H., Adams, T.M., and Bahia, H.U, 2004. Pavement roughness modeling using back-propagation neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19 (4), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chootinan, P., et al., 2006. A multi-year pavement maintenance program using a stochastic simulation-based genetic algorithm approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40 (9), 725–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, Y., and Ghahramani, Z, 2016. Dropout as a Bayesian approximation: representing model uncertainty in deep learning. In: 33rd International conference on machine learning, 3, ICML, 1651–1660.
   Google Scholar
• Galvis Arce, O.D., and Zhang, Z., 2021. Skid resistance deterioration model at the network level using Markov chains. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (1), 118–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Aguiar-Moya, J.P., and Zhang, Z, 2012. Bayesian analysis of heterogeneity in modeling of pavement fatigue cracking. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 26 (1), 37–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, H., et al., 2021. Neural networks for fatigue cracking prediction using outputs from pavement mechanistic-empirical design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (2), 162–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, A., 2011. Practical variational inference for neural networks. In: J. Shawe-Taylor et al. (eds.). Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS). New York: Curran Associates Inc., 2348–2356.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, F., et al., 2021. A weighted multi-output neural network model for the prediction of rigid pavement deterioration. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi:10.1080/10298436.2020.1867854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, F., Gregory, J., and Kirchain, R, 2020. Incorporating cost uncertainty and path dependence into treatment selection for pavement networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 110 (December 2018), 40–55.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, A.J., Chehab, G.R., and Saad, G.A, 2021. The use of deep neural networks for developing generic pavement rutting predictive models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J, 2008. Introduction to neural networks with Java. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Heaton Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hintion, G.E., and Camp, D. van, 1993. Keeping neural networks simple by minimising the description length of weights. In: Proceedings of the 16th annual conference on learning theory (COLT). ACM, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F., 2007. Modeling heterogeneity in transportation infrastructure deterioration: application to pavement: Austin: The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F., and Prozzi, J.A, 2006. Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12 (2), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, F., and Prozzi, J.A, 2010. Roughness model accounting for heterogeneity based on in-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (3), 205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, F., and Prozzi, J.A, 2015. Pavement deterioration model incorporating unobserved heterogeneity for optimal life-cycle rehabilitation policy. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (1), 04014027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S.A., Alhasan, A., and Smadi, O, 2020. Use of deep learning to study modeling deterioration of pavements a case study in Iowa. Infrastructures, 5 (11), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini, S.A., and Smadi, O, 2021. How prediction accuracy can affect the decision-making process in pavement management system. Infrastructures, 6 (2), 28–17.
   Google Scholar
• Inkoom, S., et al., 2019. Prediction of the crack condition of highway pavements using machine learning models. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 15 (7), 940–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kargah-Ostadi, N., Stoffels, S.M., and Tabatabaee, N, 2010. Network-level pavement roughness prediction model for rehabilitation recommendations. Transportation Research Record, 2155, 124–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlaftis, A.G., and Badr, A, 2015. Predicting asphalt pavement crack initiation following rehabilitation treatments. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 55, 510–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, K.D., and Madanat, S.M, 2005. Model uncertainty and the management of a system of infrastructure facilities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 13 (5–6), 391–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., Xie, W.C., and Haas, R, 1996. Reliability-based processing of markov chains for modeling pavement network deterioration. Transportation Research Record, 1524, 203–213.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, G., Niu, F., and Wu, Z, 2020. Life-cycle performance prediction for rigid runway pavement using artificial neural network. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (14), 1806–1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanat, S, 1993. Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty. Transportation Research Part C, 1 (1), 77–88.
   Google Scholar
• Madanat, S.M., Karlaftis, M.G., and McCarthy, P.S, 1997. Probabilistic infrastructure deterioration models with panel data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 3 (1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, M., Rahman, M., and Mathavan, S, 2019. A multi-input deterioration-prediction model for asphalt road networks. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 172 (1), 12–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi, M., 2021. Tunnel traffic accident prediction based on BPNN-adaboost model. Nanjing: Southeast University.
   Google Scholar
• Montella, A, 2011. Identifying crash contributory factors at urban roundabouts and using association rules to explore their relationships to different crash types. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43 (4), 1451–1463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montella, A., et al., 2012. Analysis of powered two-wheeler crashes in Italy by classification trees and rules discovery. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 49, 58–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOT, 2018. Highway performance assessment standards JTG 5210-2018 (MOT: Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China). Beijing: People’s Communications Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Okte, E., and Al-Qadi, I.L, 2021. Prediction of flexible pavement 3-D finite element responses using Bayesian neural networks. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu-Ababio, S, 1998. Effect of neural network topology on flexible pavement cracking prediction. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 13 (5), 349–355.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, A., and Abdel-Aty, M, 2009. Market basket analysis of crash data from large jurisdictions and its potential as a decision support tool. Safety Science, 47 (1), 145–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantuso, A., et al., 2021. Development of network-level pavement deterioration curves using the linear empirical Bayes approach. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (6), 780–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prozzi, J.A., and Madanat, S, 2004, March. Development of pavement deterioration models by combining experimental and field data sets. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10, 529–536.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, S., et al., 2018. Risk based probabilistic pavement deterioration prediction models for low volume roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (1), 88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, S., Kwon, Y., and Kim, W.Y, 2019. Uncertainty quantification of molecular property prediction with Bayesian neural networks, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, J., Najafabadi, E.R., and Kaboli, M.E, 2017. Development of degradation model for urban asphalt pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (8), 659–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., et al., 2020. A comparison of network level pavement condition assessment in road asset management. International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology, 6 (3), 95.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., et al., 2020. A binary cuckoo search for combinatorial optimization in multiyear pavement maintenance programs. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2020, Article ID: 8851325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, F., Yang, S., and Cheng, J, 2021. Practical two-stage bottom-up approach with a new optimization objective for infrastructure maintenance management. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 27 (4), 05021008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., et al., 2018. Association rule analysis of factors contributing to extraordinarily severe traffic crashes in China. Journal of Safety Research, 67, 65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamany, M.S., et al., 2020. Characterizing the performance of interstate flexible pavements using artificial neural networks and random parameters regression. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 26 (2), 04020010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamany, M.S, 2020. Stochastic performance and maintenance optimization models for pavement infrastructure management. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Yamany, M.S., and Abraham, D.M, 2021. Hybrid approach to incorporate preventive maintenance effectiveness into probabilistic pavement performance models. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 147 (1), 04020077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamany, M.S., Abraham, D.M., and Labi, S, 2021. Comparative analysis of Markovian methodologies for modeling infrastructure system performance. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 27 (2), 04021003-1–04021003-13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., et al., 2006. Modeling crack deterioration of flexible pavements: comparison of recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks. Transportation Research Record, 1974, 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, L., et al., 2019. Establishment of prediction models of asphalt pavement performance based on a novel data calibration method and neural network. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (1), 66–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, L., et al., 2021. Modelling of pavement performance evolution considering uncertainty and interpretability: a machine learning based framework. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 0 (0), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yehia, A., and Swei, O, 2020, January. Probabilistic infrastructure performance models: an iterative-methods approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111, 245–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., and Gao, L, 2018. A nested modelling approach to infrastructure performance characterisation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (2), 174–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Okte, E., and Al-Qadi, I.L, 2021. Predicting pavement roughness using deep learning algorithms. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675, 1062–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziari, H., et al., 2015. Prediction of IRI in short and long terms for flexible pavements: ANN and GMDH methods. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (9), 776–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar