Resilient modulus estimation using in-situ modulus detector: performance and factors

References

• AASHTO, 2008. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: A manual of practice. Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO M., 2004. Standard specification for materials for aggregate and soil-aggregate subbase, base, and surface courses.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, D., 2012. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort, ASTM D698.
   Google Scholar
• Byun, Y.H., et al., 2018. Embedded shear wave transducer for estimating stress and modulus of As-constructed unbound aggregate base layer. Construction and Building Materials, 183, 465–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, Y.H., and Kim, D.J, 2022. In-situ modulus detector for subgrade characterization. International Journal Pavement Engineering, 23 (2), 297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun, Y.H., and Lee, J.S, 2013. Instrumented dynamic cone penetrometer corrected with transferred energy into a cone tip: a laboratory study. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 36 (4), 533–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duddu, S.R., and Chennarapu, H, 2022. Quality control of compaction with lightweight deflectometer (LWD) device: a state-of-art. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 13 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabr, M.A., et al., 2000. DCP criteria for performance evaluation of pavement layers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 14 (4), 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, W.T., et al., 2017. Strength and stiffness assessment of railway track substructures using crosshole-type dynamic cone penetrometer. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 100, 88–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W.T., Kim, S.Y., and Lee, J.S, 2022. Evaluation of driving energy transferred to split spoon sampler for accuracy improvement of standard penetration test. Measurement, 188, 110384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jibon, M., and Mishra, D, 2021. Light weight deflectometer testing in Proctor molds to establish resilient modulus properties of fine-grained soils. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 33 (2), 06020025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., et al., 2008. Effect of penetration rate on cone penetration resistance in saturated clayey soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 134 (8), 1142–1153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.J., and Byun, Y. H, 2019. Development and performance evaluation of in-situ dynamic stiffness analyzer. Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 61 (2), 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S.Y., and Lee, J.S, 2020. Energy correction of dynamic cone penetration index for reliable evaluation of shear strength in frozen sand–silt mixtures. Acta Geotechnica, 15 (4), 947–961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.J., Yu, J.D., and Byun, Y.H, 2021. Piezoelectric ring bender for characterization of shear waves in compacted sandy soils. Sensors, 21 (4), 1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleyn, E.G., 1975. The use of the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP), Transvaal Roads Department, Report Number L2/74, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Langton, D.D., 1999. The Panda lightweight penetrometer for soil investigation and monitoring material compaction, Ground Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J.S., et al., 2019. Assessing subgrade strength using an instrumented dynamic cone penetrometer. Soils and Foundations, 59 (4), 930–941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., et al., 2018. In situ modulus reduction characteristics of stabilized pavement foundations by multichannel analysis of surface waves and falling weight deflectometer tests. Construction and Building Materials, 188, 809–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livneh, M., Ishai, I., and Livneh, N.A, 1992. Automated DCP device versus manual DCP device. Road Transport Research, 1 (4), 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Nazzal, M., et al., 2004. Evaluating the potential use of a portable LFWD for characterizing pavement layers and subgrades. Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects, 1, 915–924.
   Google Scholar
• Peraka, N.S.P., and Biligiri, K.P, 2020. Pavement asset management systems and technologies: A review. Automation in Construction, 119, 103336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmertmann, J.H., Hartman, J.P., and Brown, P.R, 1978. Improved strain influence factor diagrams. Journal of Geotechical Engineerig Division, 104 (8), 1131–1135.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C.W., Afsharikia, Z., and Khosravifar, S, 2017. Standardizing lightweight deflectometer modulus measurements for compaction quality assurance (No. MD-17-SHA-UM-3-20). Maryland. State Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Tovar-Valencia, R.D., et al., 2021. Effect of base geometry on the resistance of model piles in sand. Journal of Geotechical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 147 (3), 04020180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umashankar, B., Hariprasad, C., and Kumar, G.T, 2016. Compaction quality control of pavement layers using LWD. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (2), 04015111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, S.L., Grau, R.H., and Williams, T.P., 1992. Description and application of dual mass dynamic cone penetrometer, Instruction Report GL-92-3, Department of the Army, US Army Corporation of Engineers, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Q., and Chang, G.K, 2013. Evaluation of intelligent compaction for asphalt materials. Automation in Construction, 30, 104–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar