Selection of suitable backcalculation technique and prediction of laboratory resilient modulus from NDT devices

References

• AASHTO, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2020. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: a manual of practice. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T307-99, 2003. Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregates. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation officials.
   Google Scholar
• Abd El-Raof, H.S., Abd El-Hakim, R.T., El-Badawy, S.M. and Afify, H.A., 2018. Simplified closed-form procedure for network-level determination of pavement layer moduli from falling weight deflectometer data, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144(4), 04018052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akmaz, E., et al., 2020. Construction quality control of unbound base course using light weight deflectometer where reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate is used as an example. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674 (10), 989–1002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri, M., Yavari, N., and Scullion, T., 2009. Comparison of static and dynamic backcalculation of flexible pavement layers moduli, using four software programs. Asian Journal of Applied Sciences, 2 (3), 197–210. Eagleson.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E2583-07, 2015. Standard test method for measuring deflections with a light weight deflectometer (LWD). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. doi:10.1520/E2583-07R15.
   Google Scholar
• Beleites, C., et al., 2013. Sample size planning for classification models. Analytica Chimica Acta, 760, 25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, C.M., 1995. Neural networks for pattern recognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bors, A.G., 2001, February. Introduction of the radial basis function (rbf) networks. In Online symposium for electronics engineers (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–7). San Jose, CA: DSP Algorithms.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, A.J., and Baladi, G.Y., eds., 1989. Non-destructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli (Vol. 1026). ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, D., et al., 2019. Comparisons of asphalt pavement responses computed using layer properties backcalculated from dynamic and static approaches. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 20 (5), 1114–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, D., et al., 2020. Effectiveness of static and dynamic backcalculation approaches for asphalt pavement. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 47 (7), 846–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H, et al., 2005. Backcalculation of full-depth asphalt pavement layer moduli considering nonlinear stress-dependent subgrade behavior. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 6, 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., Bayrak, M.B., and Gopalakrishnan, K., 2014. Neural networks applications in pavement engineering: A recent survey. International Journal of Pavement Research & Technology, 7 (6), 434–444.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, S., et al., 2019. A rational approach to select the number of field tests required to determine subgrade properties. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (9), 1118–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.Y., Prayogo, D., and Wu, Y.W., 2019. A self-tuning least squares support vector machine for estimating the pavement rutting behavior of asphalt mixtures. Soft Computing, 23 (17), 7755–7768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, Y.J., and Lytton, R.L., 1991. Accuracy and consistency of backcalculated pavement layer moduli. Transportation Research Record, 1293, 72–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dibike, Y.B., et al., 2001. Model induction with support vector machines: introduction and applications. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 15 (3), 208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duddu, S.R., and Chennarapu, H., 2022. Quality control of compaction with lightweight deflectometer (LWD) device: a state-of-art. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 13 (1), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Tertre, A., Cascante, G., and Tighe, S.L., 2010. Combining portable falling weight deflectometer and surface wave measurements for evaluation of longitudinal joints in asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2152 (1), 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S.M., and Kamel, M.A., 2011. Assessment and improvement of the accuracy of the Odemark transformation method. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies, 5 (2), 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Elbagalati, O., et al., 2017. Development of an artificial neural network model to predict subgrade resilient modulus from continuous deflection testing. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 44 (9), 700–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R.P., and Thornton, S.I., 1988. Simplification of subgrade resilient modulus testing. Transportation Research Record, 1192, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhri, M., and Dezfoulian, R.S., 2019. Pavement structural evaluation based on roughness and surface distress survey using neural network model. Construction and Building Materials, 204, 768–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P.R., Frost, M.W., and Lambert, J.P., 2007. Review of lightweight deflectometer for routine in situ assessment of pavement material stiffness. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2004 (1), 80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, P.R., Frost, M.W., and Rogers, C.D.F., 2000. A comparison of devices for measuring stiffness in situ. Proc. of the Unbound Aggregates in Road Construction—UNBAR 5, CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group), New York, NY, 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Flores, J.M., et al., 2022. Dynamic back-calculation approach of deflections obtained from the Rolling dynamic deflectometer: Application and validation. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 148 (2), 04022010–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., Tan, C.Y., and Chan, W.T., 1997. Backcalculation analysis of pavement-layer moduli using genetic algorithms. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1570 (1), 134–142.
   Google Scholar
• George, V., and Kumar, A., 2018. Studies on modulus of resilience using cyclic tri-axial test and correlations to PFWD, DCP, and CBR. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (11), 976–985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, P., Plati, C., and Loizos, A., 2018. Soft computing models to predict pavement roughness: A comparative study. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2018, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goktepe, A.B., Agar, E., and Lav, A.H., 2006. Advances in backcalculating the mechanical properties of flexible pavements. Advances in Engineering Software, 37 (7), 421–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, K., and Kim, S., 2010. Support vector machines for nonlinear pavement backanalysis. Journal of Civil Engineering, 38 (2), 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, K., and Kim, S., 2011. Support vector machines approach to HMA stiffness prediction. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 137 (2), 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, J.G., et al., 2015. Capturing a layer response during the curing of stabilized earthwork using a multiple sensor lightweight deflectometer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27 (6), 04014183–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, F., et al., 2018. Prediction of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement performance using artificial neural network approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (5), 1147–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzarlapudi, S.D., Adigopula, V.K., and Kumar, R., 2016. Comparative studies of lightweight deflectometer and benkelman beam deflectometer in low volume roads. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 3 (5), 438–447.
   Google Scholar
• Hamim, A., et al., 2018. Comparative study on using static and dynamic finite element models to develop FWD measurement on flexible pavement structures. Construction and Building Materials, 176, 583–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, C., et al., 2021. Application of a hybrid neural network structure for FWD backcalculation based on LTPP database. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z., and Vanapalli, S.K., 2016. Relationship between resilient modulus and suction for compacted subgrade soils. Engineering Geology, 211, 85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, H.F., Mousa, R.M., and Gadallah, A.A., 2003. Comparative analysis of using AASHTO and WESDEF approaches in back-calculation of pavement layer moduli. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 129 (3), 322–329.
   Google Scholar
• Haykin, S., 1994. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation. New York: MacMillan College Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, T., and Lewicki, P., 2006. Statistics: methods and applications: a comprehensive reference for science, industry, and data mining. StatSoft, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang, N.D., Nguyen, Q.L., and Tien Bui, D., 2018. Image processing–based classification of asphalt pavement cracks using support vector machine optimized by artificial bee colony. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32 (5), 04018037–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horak, E., 1987. The Use of Surface Deflection Basin Measurements in the Mechanistic Analysis of Flexible Pavements.” Proceedings, Sixth International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Volume I. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MICHIGAN.
   Google Scholar
• IRC: 115, 2014. Guidelines for Structural Evaluation and Strengthening of Flexible Road Pavements Using Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) Technique. New Delhi: The Indian Roads Congress.
   Google Scholar
• IRC: 37, 2018. Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. In Indian Roads Congress.
   Google Scholar
• IS: 1498-1970. Indian Standard Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, Y., et al., 2006. A simplified method for dynamic response of flexible pavement and applications in time domain backcalculation. J. Am. Sci., 2 (2), 70–81.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., et al., 2022. Evaluation of inverted pavement by structural condition indicators from falling weight deflectometer. Construction and Building Materials, 319, 125991–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kameyama, S., et al., 1997. Backcalculation of pavement layer moduli using genetic algorithms. In Eighth International Conference on Asphalt PavementsFederal Highway Administration (No. Volume II).
   Google Scholar
• Karballaeezadeh, N., et al., 2019. Prediction of remaining service life of pavement using an optimized support vector machine (case study of semnan–firuzkuh road). Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 13 (1), 188–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezhen, Y., et al., 2011. Prediction of resilient modulus of asphalt pavement material using support vector machine. In Road pavement and material characterization, modeling, and maintenance (pp. 16-23).
   Google Scholar
• Kheradmandi, N., and Modarres, A., 2018. Precision of back-calculation analysis and independent parameters-based models in estimating the pavement layers modulus-field and experimental study. Construction and Building Materials, 171, 598–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S.H., Yang, J. and Jeong, J.H., 2014. Prediction of subgrade resilient modulus using artificial neural network. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 18 (5), 1372–1379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., Adigopula Jr, V.K., and Guzzarlapudi, S.D., 2017. Stiffness-based quality control evaluation of modified subgrade soil using lightweight deflectometer. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (9), 04017137–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., et al., 2018. In situ modulus reduction characteristics of stabilized pavement foundations by multichannel analysis of surface waves and falling weight deflectometer tests. Construction and Building Materials, 188, 809–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., 2022. The application of support vector machine in the calculation of pavement structural modulus. In: International Conference on Frontier Computing. vol. 827. Singapore: Springer, 1190–1195.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., and Wang, H., 2019. Development of ANN-GA program for backcalculation of pavement moduli under FWD testing with viscoelastic and nonlinear parameters. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20 (4), 490–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livneh, M., and Goldberg, Y., 2001. Quality assessment during road formation and foundation construction: Use of falling-weight deflectometer and light drop weight. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1755 (1), 69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Lytton, R.L., 1989. Backcalculation of pavement layer properties (pp. 7-38). ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Mabrouk, G.M., et al., 2021. 3D-finite element pavement structural model for using with traffic speed deflectometers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouk, G.M., et al., 2022. Using ANN modeling for pavement layer moduli backcalculation as a function of traffic speed deflections. Construction and Building Materials, 315, 125736–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marecos, V., et al., 2017. Evaluation of a highway pavement using non-destructive tests: falling weight deflectometer and ground penetrating radar. Construction and Building Materials, 154, 1164–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2007. Comparative evaluation of subgrade resilient modulus from non-destructive, in-situ, and laboratory methods (No. FHWA/LA. 06/417). Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2008. Development of models to estimate the subgrade and subbase layers’ resilient modulus from in situ devices test results for construction control (No. FHWA/LA/406). Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S.H., Gabr, M.A., and Borden, R.H., 2017. Subgrade resilient modulus prediction using light-weight deflectometer data. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 54 (3), 304–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassiri, S., et al., 2015. Evaluation of variation in unbound layers’ moduli and its effect on pavement design. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 9 (2), 140–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzal, M., et al., 2004. Evaluating the potential use of a portable LFWD for characterizing pavement layers and subgrades. In Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects (pp. 915-924).
   Google Scholar
• Nazzal, M.D., and Mohammad, L.N., 2010. Estimation of resilient modulus of subgrade soils for design of pavement structures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22 (7), 726–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, K., et al., 2018. Systematic back-calculation protocol and prediction of resilient modulus for MEPDG. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (1), 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H.L., et al., 2019. Development of hybrid artificial intelligence approaches and a support vector machine algorithm for predicting the marshall parameters of stone matrix asphalt. Applied Sciences, 9 (15), 3172–20.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, R., Elder, J., and Miner, G., 2009. Handbook of statistical analysis and data mining applications. USA: Academic press.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, M., and Deswal, S., 2014. Extreme learning machine based modeling of resilient modulus of subgrade soils. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 32 (2), 287–296.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B., Chun, S., and Han, S., 2019. Application of falling weight deflectometer (FWD) data and energy ratio (ER) approach for cracking performance evaluation of asphalt pavements. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17 (11), 1729–1737.
   Google Scholar
• Pekcan, O., Tutumluer, E., and Thompson, M., 2008, October. Artificial neural network based backcalculation of conventional flexible pavements on lime stabilised soils. In The 12th. International Conference of Iinternational Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, India.
   Google Scholar
• Rakesh, N., et al., 2006. Artificial neural networks—genetic algorithm based model for backcalculation of pavement layer moduli. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7 (3), 221–230.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, M.A., Reddy, K.S., and Pandey, B.B., 2002. Backcalculation of pavement moduli using genetic algorithms. J Highw Res Board, 66, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Saltan, M., and Terzi, S., 2008. Modeling deflection basin using artificial neural networks with cross-validation technique in backcalculating flexible pavement layer moduli. Advances in Engineering Software, 39 (7), 588–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangghaleh, A., et al., 2014. Backcalculation of pavement layer elastic modulus and thickness with measurement errors. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (6), 521–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senseney, C.T., Krahenbuhl, R.A., and Mooney, M.A., 2013. Genetic algorithm to optimize layer parameters in light weight deflectometer backcalculation. International Journal of Geomechanics, 13 (4), 473–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senseney, C.T., and Mooney, M.A., 2010. Characterization of Two-layer soil system using a lightweight Deflectometer with radial sensors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2186 (1), 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, M. A., Maier, H. R., and Jaksa, M. B., 2004. Data division for developing neural networks applied to geotechnical engineering. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 18 (2), 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., and Das, A., 2008. Backcalculation of pavement layer moduli from falling weight deflectometer data using an artificial neural network. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 35 (1), 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siekmeier, J.A., Young, D., and Beberg, D., 2000. Comparison of the dynamic cone penetrometer with other tests during subgrade and granular base characterization in Minnesota. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1375, 175–188.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K.D., et al., 2017. Using falling weight deflectometer data with mechanistic-empirical design and analysis, volume I (No. FHWA-HRT-16-009). United States. Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Smola, A.J., and Schölkopf, B., 2004. A tutorial on support vector regression. Statistics and Computing, 14 (3), 199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, X., et al., 2017. Back-calculation of resilient modulus and prediction of permanent deformation for fine-grained subgrade under cyclic loading. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (5), 04016284–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarefder, R.A., and Ahmed, M.U., 2013. Consistency and accuracy of selected FWD backcalculation software for computing layer modulus of airport pavements. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 7 (1), 21–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tay, F.E., and Cao, L., 2001. Application of support vector machines in financial time series forecasting. omega, 29 (4), 309–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzan, J, 1994. Advanced backcalculation techniques. In Non-destructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli: Second Volume. ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J., Lytton, R.L., and Germann, F.P, 1989. Nondestructive testing of pavements and backcalculation of moduli. Non-destructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, 1026, 217–228.
   Google Scholar
• Vapnik, V, 1998. Statistical learning theory. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 41 (4), 3185–3185.
   Google Scholar
• Vennapusa, P.K., and White, D.J, 2009. Comparison of light weight deflectometer measurements for pavement foundation materials. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 32 (3), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennapusa, P.K., Zhang, Y., and White, D.J, 2016. Comparison of pavement slab stabilization using cementitious grout and injected polyurethane foam. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30 (6), 04016056–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, V., Singh, A.P., and Srivastava, A, 2021. Prediction of asphalt pavement condition using FWD deflection basin parameters and artificial neural networks. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (12), 2748–2766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2019. Structural assessment of asphalt pavement condition using backcalculated modulus and field data. Construction and Building Materials, 211, 943–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2020. A hybrid model for prediction in asphalt pavement performance based on support vector machine and grey relation analysis. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2021. Prediction of airfield pavement responses from surface deflections: comparison between the traditional backcalculation approach and the ANN model. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (9), 1930–1945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.J., Hong, Z., and Zhang, J.L., 2010, June. An approximate calculation of highway pavement modulus based on FWD deflection basin. In 2010 International Conference on Mechanic Automation and Control Engineering (pp. 2863-2866). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• William, G.W., 1999. Backcalculation of pavement layers moduli using three-dimensional nonlinear explicit finite element analysis. West Virginia University.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, T., and Ozyilmaz, L, 2002. Dimensionality reduction in conic section function neural network. Sadhana: Proc. Indian Acad. Sci, 27 (6), 675–683.
   Google Scholar
• You, L., Yan, K., and Liu, N, 2020. Assessing artificial neural network performance for predicting interlayer conditions and layer modulus of multi-layered flexible pavement. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 14 (2), 487–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaman, M., et al., 2010. Neural network modeling of resilient modulus using routine subgrade soil properties. International Journal of Geomechanics, 10 (1), 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., 2013. Radial basis function neural network predicting of resilient modulus for Shanxi Subgrade Soils. In ICTE 2013: Safety, Speediness, Intelligence, Low-Carbon, Innovation (pp. 1734-1739).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, M., et al., 2022. Numerical investigation of pavement responses under TSD and FWD loading. Construction and Building Materials, 318, 126014–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Otto, F., and Oeser, M, 2021. Pavement moduli back-calculation using artificial neural network and genetic algorithms. Construction and Building Materials, 287, 123026–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y., Cao, D., and Chen, P, 2015. Dynamic backcalculation of asphalt pavement layer properties using spectral element method. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (4), 870–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar