Characteristics of compressive stress around dowel joint in concrete pavement system

References

• ABAQUS, 2014. 6.14, CAE user’s guide. Dassault systems 2014.
   Google Scholar
• ABAQUS, 2014. Dassault systems, Waltham, MA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ACI Committee 325, 2002. ACI 325.12R-02 Guide for design of jointed concrete pavements for streets and local roads. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2014a. Evaluation of performance and design of GFRP dowels in jointed plain concrete pavement–part 1: experimental investigation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (5), 449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2014b. Evaluation of performance and design of GFRP dowels in jointed plain concrete pavement–part 2: numerical simulation and design considerations. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (8), 752–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2018. Experimental investigation on the combined effect of dowel misalignment and cyclic wheel loading on dowel bar performance in JPCP. Engineering Structures, 174, 256–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2022. Numerical evaluation of the combined effect of dowel misalignment and wheel load on dowel bars performance in JPCP. Engineering Structures, 252, 113655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structure. Washington, D.C: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, K, 2000. Nonlinear response of transverse joints of airfield pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (2), 168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Boresi, A P., Chong, K., and Lee, J. D, 2010. Elasticity in engineering mechanics. New Jersey: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Channakeshava, C., Barzegar, F., and Voyiadjis, G. Z, 1993. Nonlinear FE analysis of plain concrete pavements with doweled joints. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 119 (5), 763–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davids, W. G, 2001. 3D finite element study on load transfer at doweled joints in flat and curled rigid pavements. International Journal of Geomechanics, 1 (3), 309–323.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, W. G., et al., 2003. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of jointed plain concrete pavement with EverFE2. 2. Transportation Research Record, 1853 (1), 92–99.
   Google Scholar
• Friberg, B., Richart, F., and Bradbury, R., 1939. Load and deflection characteristics of dowels in transverse joints of concrete pavements. Highway Research Board Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, J. C., and Chan, T-M, 2022. Experimental and numerical study on the structural performance of the stainless steel ring strengthened removable dowel bar connection system. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2022.2126977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Larson, R., and Snyder, M., 1993. A nonlinear mechanistic model for dowel looseness in PCC pavements. Fifth International Conference on Concrete Pavement Design and Rehabilitation. Purdue University, School of Civil Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Sherwood, J. A., and Snyder, M. B, 1995. Component dowel-bar model for load-transfer systems in PCC pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121 (3), 289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrichs, K. W, et al., 1989. Rigid pavement analysis and design. United States: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández López, F. M., et al., 2020. 3D-FE of jointed plain concrete pavement over continuum elastic foundation to obtain the edge stress. Revista de la Construcción, 19 (1), 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y. H., 1985. A computer package for structural analysis of concrete pavements. Third International Conference on Concrete Pavement Design and Rehabilitation. Purdue University, School of Civil Engineering; Federal Highway Administration; Portland Cement Association; Transportation Research Board; Federal Aviation Administration; and Indiana Department of Highways.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., and Wang, S, 1973. Finite-element analysis of concrete slabs and its implications for rigid pavement design. Highway Research Record, 466, 55–69.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannides, A. M, 2005. Stress prediction for cracking of jointed plain concrete pavements, 1925–2000: an overview. Transportation Research Record, 1919 (1), 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., et al., 2018. Effect of dowel bar arrangements on performance of jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP). International Journal of Concrete Structures, 12 (1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., and Hjelmstad, K. D, 2003. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of doweled joints for airport pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1853 (1), 100–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, C-M., Hall, K. T., and Darter, M. I, 1995. Three-dimensional finite element model for analysis of concrete pavement support. Transportation Research Record, 1505, 119–127.
   Google Scholar
• Li, LK, et al., 2012. Characterization of contact stresses between dowels and surrounding concrete in jointed concrete pavement.
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P, 2015a. Analysis of stresses in concrete pavement under a dowel according to its diameter and load transfer efficiency. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42 (11), 845–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P, 2015b. Finite-element analysis of stress concentration around dowel bars in jointed plain concrete pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 141 (6), 06015001.
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P., and Szydło, A, 2020. The analysis of stress concentration around dowel bars in concrete pavement. Magazine of Concrete Research, 72 (2), 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahboub, K. C., Liu, Y., and Allen, D. L, 2004. Evaluation of temperature responses in concrete pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 130 (3), 395–401.
   Google Scholar
• Maitra, S. R., Reddy, K., and Ramachandra, L, 2009. Load transfer characteristics of dowel bar system in jointed concrete pavement. International Journal of Fracture, 135 (11), 813–821.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa, T., et al., 2001. Study on mechanical behavior of dowel bar in transverse joint of concrete pavement. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Concrete Pavements, Orlando.
   Google Scholar
• Nishizawa, T., Fukuda, T., and Matsuno, S., 1989. A refined model of doweled joints for concrete pavement using FEM analysis. Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Concrete Pavement Design and Rehabilitation, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J., et al., 2017. Precast concrete pavement–systems and performance review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012030.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. L., et al., 2006. Laboratory study of structural behavior of alternative dowel bars.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. L., Guinn Jr, R. J., and Lundy, A. L., 2001. Dowel bar optimization: Phases I and II.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M., and Pierson, N, 2007. Laboratory evaluation of alternative dowel bars for use in Portland cement concrete pavement construction. Transportation Research Record, 2040 (1), 80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, M., Varma, A. H., and Buch, N, 2007. Experimental and analytical investigations of mechanistic effects of dowel misalignment in jointed concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2037 (1), 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhu, M., Varma, A., and Buch, N, 2009. Analytical investigation of the effects of dowel misalignment on concrete pavement joint opening behaviour. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (1), 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priddy, L. P., et al., 2015. Three-dimensional modelling of precast concrete pavement repair joints. Magazine of Concrete Research, 67 (10), 513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riad, M. Y, 2001. Stress concentration around dowel bars in jointed rigid concrete pavements.
   Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, V., and Hesami, S, 2018a. Finite element investigation of the joints in precast concrete pavement. Computers Concrete, 21 (5), 547–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeghi, V., and Hesami, S, 2018b. Investigation of load transfer efficiency in jointed plain concrete pavements (JPCP) using FEM. International Journal of Pavement Research Technology, 11 (3), 245–252.
   Google Scholar
• Saxena, P., et al., 2009. Laboratory and finite element evaluation of joint lockup. Transportation Research Record, 2095 (1), 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukry, S. N., William, G., and Riad, M, 2002. Characteristics of concrete contact stresses in doweled transverse joints. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (2), 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shoukry, S. N., William, G. W., and Riad, M., 2011. Application of LS-DYNA in identifying critical stresses around dowel bars. 8th Int. LS-DYNA Users Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Sii, H. B., et al., 2014. Development of prediction model for doweled joint concrete pavement using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 587, 1047–1057.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., and Snyder, M. B, 2019. Manual for jointed precast concrete pavement. Carmel, IN: National Precast Concrete Association.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaie, A. M., and Barenberg, E, 1978. Finite-element analysis of jointed or cracked concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 671, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaie, A. M., and Barenberg, E. J, 1980. Structural analysis of concrete pavement systems. Transportation Engineering Journal of Asce, 106 (5), 493–506.
   Google Scholar
• Taerwe, L., and Matthys, S, 2013. Fib model code for concrete structures 2010. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tayabji, S. D., and Colley, B. E, 1986. Analysis of jointed concrete pavements.
   Google Scholar
• Tayabji, S., Ye, D., and Buch, N, 2012. Joint load transfer and support considerations for jointed precast concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 2305 (1), 74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Tayabji, S., Ye, D., and Buch, N, 2013a. Precast concrete pavement technology. Washington: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Tayabji, S., Ye, D., and Buch, N, 2013b. Precast concrete pavements: technology overview and technical considerations. Pci Journal, 58 (1), 112–128.
   Google Scholar
• Tia, M., et al., 1987. FEACONS III computer program for analysis of jointed concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1136 (1), 12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Timoshenko, S., and Lessells, J. M, 1925. Applied elasticity. East Pittsburgh: Westinghouse technical night school press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, A., et al., 2019. Concrete modular pavements–types, issues and challenges. The Baltic Journal of Road Bridge Engineering, 14 (1), 80–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, W., et al., 2020. Mechanical characteristics of dowel bar-concrete interaction: based on substructure experiment. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (7), 2392–2404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, E. J., and Witczak, M. W, 1991. Principles of pavement design. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, M., and Alvappillai, A, 1995. Contact-element model for dynamic analysis of jointed concrete pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121 (5), 425–433.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z, 2011. Stress concentration analysis in concrete round dowels for airport jointed rigid pavement system. ICTE 2011. 1566–1571.
   Google Scholar
• Zuzulova, A., Grosek, J., and Janku, M, 2020. Experimental laboratory testing on behavior of dowels in concrete pavements. Materials, 13 (10), 2343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar