Effects of copolymers on rheological and performance of binders and stone matrix asphalt mixtures

References

• AASHTO, 2012. Standard test method for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. Washington, DC: American Association of State Transport and Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T 321-07, 2007. Standard method of test for determining the fatigue life of compacted hot mix asphalt binder (HMA) subjected to repeated flexural bending (superseded). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO TP101, 2014. Estimating damage tolerance of asphalt binder binders using the linear amplitude sweep. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Abdul-Mawjoud, A.A., and Thanoon, L.S., 2015. Evaluation of SBR and PS-modified asphalt binders and HMA mixtures containing such binders. Applied Research Journal, 1, 460–469.
   Google Scholar
• Abed, Alaa H., and Bahia, Hussain U., 2020. Enhancement of permanent deformation resistance of modified asphalt binder concrete mixtures with nano-high density polyethylene. Construction and Building Materials, 236, 117604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abdul Wahhab, H. I., Dalhat, M. A., and Habib, M. A., 2017. Storage stability and high-temperature performance of asphalt binder modified with recycled plastic. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (5), 1117–1134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghrafy, Yasser M., El-Badawy, Sherif M., and Abd Alla, El-Sayed M., 2021. Rheological and environmental evaluation of sulfur extended asphalt binder binders modified by high-and low-density polyethylene recycled waste. Construction and Building Materials, 307, 125008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameli, Alireza, et al., 2020. Permanent deformation performance of binders and stone mastic asphalt mixtures modified by SBS/montmorillonite nanocomposite. Construction and Building Materials, 239, 117700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri, Mahmoud, et al., 2016. Effects of nanoclay on hot mix asphalt performance. Petroleum Science and Technology, 34 (8), 747–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2006. Standard specification for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2008. 324 standard method of test for Hamburg wheel-track testing of compacted hot-mix asphalt binder (HMA). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D113-17, 2017. Standard test method for ductility of asphalt binder materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D36 / D36M-14, 2020. Standard test method for softening point of bitumen (ring-and-ball apparatus). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4123-82, 1995. Standard test method for indirect tension test for resilient modulus of bituminous mixtures (withdrawn 2003). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5892-96a, 2000. Standard specification for type IV polymer-modified asphalt binder cement for use in pavement construction. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5 / D5M-20, 2020. Standard test method for penetration of bituminous materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6931-17, 2017. Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of asphalt mixtures. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Babagoli, Rezvan, Hasaninia, Moein, and Namazi, Navid Mohammad, 2015. Laboratory evaluation of the effect of gilsonite on the performance of stone matrix asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (4), 889–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babagoli, Rezvan, Vamegh, Mostafa, and Mirzababaei, Peyman, 2019. Laboratory evaluation of the effect of SBS and lucobite on performance properties of bitumen. Petroleum Science and Technology, 37 (3), 255–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, Y, Meondez, MP, and Rodriguez, Y, 2001. Polymer modified asphalt. Vision Tecnologica, 9 (1), 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E. Ray, 1999. Designing stone matrix asphalt mixtures for rut-resistant pavements. Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Report No. 425 (National Cooperative Highway Research Pavement) No. 425-430.
   Google Scholar
• Chegenizadeh, Amin, Peters, Bradley, and Nikraz, Hamid, 2021. Mechanical properties of stone mastic asphalt binder containing high-density polyethene: an Australian case. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00631.
   Google Scholar
• Deo, Omkar, Sumanasooriya, Milani, and Neithalath, Narayanan, 2010. Permeability reduction in pervious concretes due to clogging: experiments and modeling. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 22 (7), 741–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Changqing, et al., 2013. Nanomaterials applied in asphalt binder modification: a review. Journal of Materials Science & Technology, 29 (7), 589–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, O., et al., 2002. Rheological techniques as a tool to analyze polymer asphalt binder interactions: asphalt binder modified with polyethylene and polyethylene-based blends. Energy & Fuels, 16 (5), 1256–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, Behbahani, et al., 2019. Improving the moisture performance of hot mix glass asphalt binder by high-density polyethylene as an asphalt binder binder modifier. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 10, 184–193.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, Ziari, et al., 2012. Influence of bentonite additive on bitumen and asphalt mixture properties. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 6, 8–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Al-Hadidy A, 2019. Laboratory investigation of aged HDPE-modified asphalt binder mixes. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 12 (4), 364–369.
   Google Scholar
• Kargar, Pourya, et al., 2020. Feasibility study of collapse remediation of Illinois loess using electrokinetics technique by nanosilica and salt. In: Geo-congress 2020: foundations, soil improvement, and erosion. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 667–675.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Sandeep, and Magandeep, 2020. Effects of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and poly-ethylene terephthalate (PET) on performance of flexible pavement. Journal of Xidian University, 14 (9), 1227–1236.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, M., et al., 2015. Investigation of the rheological properties and storage stability of CR/SBS modified asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 74, 235–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo Presti, Davide, and Airey, G., 2013. Tyre rubber-modified asphalt binder development: the effect of varying processing conditions. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (4), 888–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Yuetan, et al., 2021. The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: a review. Cleaner Materials, 2, 100031.
   Google Scholar
• Moussa, Ghada, Abdel-Raheem, Ashraf, and Abdel-Wahed, Talaat, 2020. Investigating the moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures modified with high-density polyethylene. JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 48 (5), 765–782.
   Google Scholar
• Moussa, Ghada S., Abdel-Raheem, Ashraf, and Abdel-Wahed, Talaat, 2021. Effect of nanoclay particles on the performance of high-density polyethylene-modified asphalt binder concrete mixture. Polymers, 13 (3), 434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norouzi, Navid, Ameli, Alireza, and Babagoli, Rezvan, 2021. Investigation of fatigue behaviour of warm modified binders and warm-stone matrix asphalt binder (WSMA) mixtures through binder and mixture tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 22 (8), 1042–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Lepe, A., et al., 2003. Influence of the processing conditions on the rheological behaviour of polymer-modified asphalt binderq. Fuel, 82 (11), 1339–1348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulikakos, L.D., et al., 2017. Harvesting the unexplored potential of European waste materials for road construction. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 116, 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaee, Milad, Ghomesheh, Pourya Kargar, and Hosseini, Arash Mohammad, 2017. Electrokinetic remediation of zinc and copper contaminated soil: a simulation-based study. Civil Engineering Journal, 3 (9), 690–700.
   Google Scholar
• Rezvan, Babagoli, and Hassan, Ziari, 2017. Evaluation of rutting performance of stone matrix asphalt mixtures containing warm mix additives. Journal of Central South University, 24 (2), 360–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, F. L., et al., 1996. Hot mix asphalts, mixture design and construction. Lanham, MD: NAPA Education Foundation Lanham.
   Google Scholar
• Roque, Reynaldo, et al., 2002. Implementation of SHRP indirect tension tester to mitigate cracking in asphalt binder pavements and overlays. No. WPI 0510755, Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Sengoz, Burak, Topal, Ali, and Isikyakar, Giray, 2009. Morphology and image analysis of polymer modified bitumens. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (5), 1986–1992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenjinan, 1999. Modified asphalt and SMA pavement. Beijing: People Communication Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sojobi, A.O., et al., 2016. Recycling of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic bottle wastes in bituminous asphaltic concrete. Cogent Engineering, 3 (1), 1133480. doi:10.1080/23311916.2015.1133480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, Safeer, et al., 2021. Characterization of physical & mechanical properties of asphalt binder concrete containing low-& high-density polyethylene waste as aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 301, 124127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamegh, Mostafa, Ameri, Mahmoud, and Naeni, Seyed Farhad Chavoshian, 2019. Performance evaluation of fatigue resistance of asphalt mixtures modified by SBR/PP polymer blends and SBS. Construction and Building Materials, 209, 202–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamegh, Mostafa, Ameri, Mahmoud, and Naeni, Seyed Farhad Chavoshian, 2020. Experimental investigation of effect of PP/SBR polymer blends on the moisture resistance and rutting performance of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 253, 119197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, María A., et al., 2013. Asphalt binder/polyethylene blends: rheological properties, microstructure and viscosity modeling. Construction and Building Materials, 45, 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasudevan, R., et al., 2012. A technique to dispose waste plastics in an ecofriendly way – application in construction of flexible pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 28 (1), 311–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila-Cortavitarte, M., et al., 2018. Analysis of the influence of using recycled polystyrene as a substitute for bitumen in the behaviour of asphalt concrete mixtures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1279–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Wang, C., and Bahia, H., 2017. Comparison of the fatigue failure behaviour for asphalt binder binder using both cyclic and monotonic loading modes. Construction and Building Materials, 151, 767–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y. G., Yao, H. R., and Huang, J., 2013. Structure and properties of POE modified asphalt binder. China Elastomerics, 3, 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Yildirim, Yetkin, 2007. Polymer modified asphalt binder binders. Construction and Building Materials, 21 (1), 66–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, C. H., et al., 2012. Properties of the asphalt binders modified by typical recycled polyolefin. Polymer Mater Science Engineering, 12, 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2015. Use of the MSCR test to characterize the asphalt binder binder properties relative to HMA rutting performance–A laboratory study. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 218–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Feng, and Yu, Jianying, 2010. The research for high-performance SBR compound modified asphalt binder. Construction and Building Materials, 24 (3), 410–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziari, Hasan, et al., 2014. Evaluation of fatigue behavior of hot mix asphalt mixtures prepared by bentonite modified bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, 68, 685–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziari, H., and Babagoli, R., 2015. Evaluation of fatigue and rutting behavior of asphalt binder binder containing warm additive. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33 (17–18), 1627–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziari, H., Babagoli, R., and Razi, S. E. T., 2015. The evaluation of rheofalt as a warm mix asphalt binder additive on the properties of asphalt binder binder. Petroleum Science and Technology, 33 (21–22), 1781–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziari, Hassan, Kaliji, Arman Ghasemi, and Babagoli, Rezvan, 2016. Laboratory evaluation of the effect of waste plastic bottle (PET) on rutting performance of hot mix asphalt mixtures. Petroleum Science and Technology, 34 (9), 819–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar