Experimental and numerical study on the structural performance of the stainless steel ring strengthened removable dowel bar connection system

References

• ABAQUS 6.14, 2014. Dassault systems. Waltham, MA.
   Google Scholar
• ABAQUS. 6.14 CAE User’s Guide, 2014. Dassault systemes. USA: Waltham, MA.
   Google Scholar
• ACI Committee 325, 1956. Structural design considerations for pavement joints. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 28 (1), 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• ACI Committee 325, 2002. ACI 325.12R-02 guide for design of jointed concrete pavements for streets and local roads. Detroit, MI: American Concrete Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2014. Evaluation of performance and design of GFRP dowels in jointed plain concrete pavement–part 1: experimental investigation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (5), 449–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2018. Experimental investigation on the combined effect of dowel misalignment and cyclic wheel loading on dowel bar performance in JPCP. Engineering Structures, 174, 256–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Humeidawi, B. H., and Mandal, P, 2022. Numerical evaluation of the combined effect of dowel misalignment and wheel load on dowel bars performance in JPCP. Engineering Structures, 252, 113655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structure. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• American College Personnel Association, 2008. An alternative to traditional round dowel bars.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E8 / E8M, 2021. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Azizinamini, A., et al., 1999. Proposed modifications to ACI 318-95 tension development and lap splice for high-strength concrete.
   Google Scholar
• Benmokrane, B., et al., 2014. Performance of glass fiber-reinforced polymer-doweled jointed plain concrete pavement under static and cyclic loadings. Aci Structural Journal, 111 (2), 331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birtel, V., and Mark, P., 2006. Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure. ed. ABAQUS users’ conference.
   Google Scholar
• Bronuela, L., et al., 2015. Cantilever and pull-out tests and corresponding FEM models of various dowel bars in airport concrete pavement. Construction and Building Materials, 83, 181–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS EN 12350-2, 2009. Testing hardened concrete-Part 2: Slump test.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN 12390-3, 2019. Testing hardened concrete-Part 3: compressive strength of test specimens.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN 12390-4, 2019. Testing Hardened Concrete-Part 4: compressive Strength. Specification for Testing Machines.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN 12390-5, 2019. Testing hardened concrete-Part 5: flexural strength of test specimens.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN 933-1, 2012. Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates.
   Google Scholar
• BS EN ISO 6982-1, 2016. Metallic materials-tensile testing-Part 1: method of test at room temperature.
   Google Scholar
• CEB/FIP, 1993. CEB-FIP model code 1990: Design code. Switzerland: Thomas Telford Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• CEB/FIP, 2010. Model code for concrete structures. Berlin, Germany: Ernst & Sohn, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-T., and Chang, L.-M, 2015. Paving for the future-precast prestressed concrete pavement (PPCP). Scientific Cooperations Journal of Civil Engineering Architecture, 1 (1), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson, G, 2016. Europe’s traffic hotspots measuring the impact of congestion. INRIX Research.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, W. G., et al., 2003. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of jointed plain concrete pavement with EverFE2. 2. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1853 (1), 92–99.
   Google Scholar
• DoT, U.S., and FHWA, F. 2006. Status of the Nation’s Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance: Report to Congress: Executive Summary. Washington, DC: United Department of Transportation,.
   Google Scholar
• Eddie, D., Shalaby, A., and Rizkalla, S, 2001. Glass fiber-reinforced polymer dowels for concrete pavements. Aci Structural Journal, 98 (2), 201–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Maaty, A. E. A., et al., 2017. Characteristics of jointed rigid airfield pavement using different material parameters and modeling techniques. ed. International Congress and Exhibition ‘Sustainable Civil Infrastructures: Innovative Infrastructure Geotechnology’, 66–84.
   Google Scholar
• Friberg, B., Richart, F., and Bradbury, R., 1939. Load and deflection characteristics of dowels in transverse joints of concrete pavements. ed. Highway Research Board Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalaratnam, V. S., et al., 2006. Precast prestressed panels for rapid full-depth pavement repairs. ed. Structures Congress 2006: Structural Engineering and Public Safety, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Pasko, T., and Snyder, M, 1993. Maximum bearing stress of concrete in doweled portland cement concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1388, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, H., Sherwood, J. A., and Snyder, M. B, 1995. Component dowel-bar model for load-transfer systems in PCC pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121 (3), 289–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, J. F., 2006. Comparison of alternative laboratory dowel bar testing procedures.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrichs, K. W, et al., 1989. Rigid pavement analysis and design. United States: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, CC., et al., 2017. Experimental study of dowel bar alternatives based on similarity model test. Advances in Materials Science Engineering, 2017, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keymanesh, M., et al., 2018. Evaluating the performance of dowel in PCC pavement of roads using ABAQUS finite element software. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 5 (4), 349–365.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanovich, L., et al., 2006. Accelerated loading testing of stainless steel hollow tube dowels. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1947 (1), 101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M., and Barr, B, 2004. An overview of the fatigue behaviour of plain and fibre reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 26 (4), 299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and Fenves, G. L, 1998. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124 (8), 892–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, LK., et al., 2012. Characterization of contact stresses between dowels and surrounding concrete in jointed concrete pavement.
   Google Scholar
• Lubliner, J., et al., 1989. A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 25 (3), 299–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P, 2015a. Analysis of stresses in concrete pavement under a dowel according to its diameter and load transfer efficiency. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 42 (11), 845–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P, 2015b. Finite-element analysis of stress concentration around dowel bars in jointed plain concrete pavement. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 141 (6), 06015001.
   Google Scholar
• Mackiewicz, P., and Szydło, A, 2020. The analysis of stress concentration around dowel bars in concrete pavement. Magazine of Concrete Research, 72 (2), 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitra, S. R., Reddy, K., and Ramachandra, L, 2009. Load transfer characteristics of dowel bar system in jointed concrete pavement. International Journal of Fracture, 135 (11), 813–821.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, D. K., and Tayabji, S., 2009. Precast prestressed concrete pavement for reconstruction and rehabilitation of existing pavements.
   Google Scholar
• Murison, S, 2004. Evaluation of concrete-filled GFRP dowels for jointed concrete pavements.
   Google Scholar
• Murison, S., Shalaby, A., and Mufti, A, 2005. Concrete-filled, glass fiber–reinforced polymer dowels for load transfer in jointed rigid pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1919 (1), 54–64.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J., et al., 2017. Precast concrete pavement–systems and performance review. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012030.
   Google Scholar
• Olidis, C., et al., 2010. Precast slab literature review report: repair of rigid airfield pavements using precast concrete panels-a state-of-the-art review.
   Google Scholar
• Park, R, 1989. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 22 (3), 155–166.
   Google Scholar
• Pijpers, R, and Slot, H, 2020. Friction coefficients for steel to steel contact surfaces in air and seawater. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1669, 012002.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M. L., and Center, C. T., 2006. Testing structural behavior of alternative dowel bars.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, M., and Pierson, N, 2007. Laboratory evaluation of alternative dowel bars for use in Portland cement concrete pavement construction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2040 (1), 80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, M., Varma, A. H., and Buch, N, 2007. Experimental and analytical investigations of mechanistic effects of dowel misalignment in jointed concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2037 (1), 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Priddy, L. P., Bly, P. G., and Flintsch, G. W, 2013. Review of precast portland cement concrete panel technologies for use in expedient portland cement concrete airfield pavement repairs.
   Google Scholar
• Riad, M. Y., et al., 2009. Effect of skewed joints on the performance of jointed concrete pavement through 3D dynamic finite element analysis. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (4), 251–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schexnayder, C., Ullman, G., and Anderson, S, 2007. Pavement reconstruction scenarios using precast concrete pavement panels. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 12 (4), 186–199.
   Google Scholar
• Shoukry, S. N., William, G., and Riad, M, 2002. Characteristics of concrete contact stresses in doweled transverse joints. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (2), 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shoukry, S., William, G., and Riad, M, 2007. Effect of thermal stresses on mid-slab cracking in dowel jointed concrete pavements. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 3 (1), 43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. D, et al., 2014. Concrete pavement preservation guide. U.S. Department of Transportation: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P., and Snyder, M. B, 2019. Manual for jointed precast concrete pavement. National Precast Concrete Association.
   Google Scholar
• Syed, A., and Sonparote, R, 2017. Analysis of prestressed precast concrete pavement. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4 (9), 9713–9717.
   Google Scholar
• Syed, A., and Sonparote, R, 2020. A review of precast concrete pavement technology. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 15, 22–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaie, A. M., and Barenberg, E, 1978. Finite-element analysis of jointed or cracked concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record, 671, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Tayabji, S., Ye, D., and Buch, N, 2013. Precast concrete pavement technology. Washington: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Teller, L. W., and Cashell, H. D, 1959. Performance of doweled joints under repetitive loading. Highway Research Board Bulletin, 217, 8–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuji, T., 1996. Joint structure for coupling precast concrete pavement slabs. Google Patents.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, A., et al., 2019. Concrete modular pavements–types, issues and challenges. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 14 (1), 80–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velkavrh, I, and Kalin, M, 2011. Effect of base oil lubrication in comparison with non-lubricated sliding in diamond-like carbon contacts. Tribology - Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces, 5, 53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, W., et al., 2020. Mechanical characteristics of dowel bar-concrete interaction: based on substructure experiment. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (7), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuzulova, A., Grosek, J., and Janku, M, 2020. Experimental laboratory testing on behavior of dowels in concrete pavements. Materials, 13 (10), 2343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar