221
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A new methodology to assess the remaining service life of motorway pavements at the network level from traffic speed deflectometer measurements

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Article: 2128349 | Received 16 Jan 2022, Accepted 19 Sep 2022, Published online: 30 Sep 2022

References

  • Asphalt Institute, 1981. Thickness design - Asphalt pavements for highways and streets.
  • Baltzer, S., 2009. Three years of High Speed Deflectograph measurements of the Danish state road network. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 1, 443–450.
  • Baltzer, S., et al., 2010. Continuous bearing capacity profile of 18000 km Australian road network in 5 months. In: 24th ARRB Conference, Melbourne.
  • Barriera, M., et al., 2020. In situ pavement monitoring: A review. Infrastructures, 5 (2), 18.
  • Chen, W., and Zheng, M., 2021. Multi-objective optimization for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making: A critical review and future directions. Automation in Construction, 130, 103840.
  • Christensen, B.M.L., 2016. A comparison of traffic speed deflectometer and falling weight deflectometer data – Different approaches for comparing the two devices. Civil Engineering Bachelor thesis, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kongens Lyngby.
  • Dias, K, et al., 2005. Beneath the wheel - Greenwood engineering. Odense, Denmark: University of Southern Denmark.
  • Evensen, R., and Senstad, P., 1992. Distress and damage factors for flexible pavements. Directorate of Public Roads, Norwegian Road Research Laboratory, Publication No. 66.
  • Ferne, B., et al., 2009. Development of the UK highways agency Traffic Speed Deflectometer. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 1, 409–418.
  • Finn, F., et al., 1986. Development of pavement structural subsystems. Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Report 291.
  • Flintsch, G.W., et al., 2012. Evaluation of traffic-speed deflectometers. Transportation Research Record, 2304, 37-46.
  • Flintsch, G.W., et al., 2013. Assessment of continuous pavement deflection measuring technologies. Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2), Report S2-R06F-RW-1.
  • Greenwood Engineering, 2021. Traffic speed deflectometer. Available from: https://greenwood.dk/road/tsd/ [Accessed Sept 2021].
  • Hildebrand, G., and Rasmussen, S., 2002. Development of a high speed deflectograph. Danish Road Institute, Report 117.
  • Hou, Y., et al., 2021. The state-of-the-art review on applications of intrusive sensing, image processing techniques, and machine learning methods in pavement monitoring and analysis. Engineering, 7 (6), 845–856.
  • Ingrassia, L.P., et al., 2020b. Top-down cracking in Italian motorway pavements: A case study. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13, e00442.
  • Ingrassia, L.P., et al., 2021. Monitoring the evolution of the structural properties of warm recycled pavements with falling weight deflectometer and laboratory tests. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (S1), S69–S82.
  • Ingrassia, L.P., Virgili, A., and Canestrari, F., 2020a. Effect of geocomposite reinforcement on the performance of thin asphalt pavements: accelerated pavement testing and laboratory analysis. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 12, e00342.
  • Katicha, S.W., et al., 2014. Limits of agreement method for comparing TSD and FWD measurements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (6), 532–541.
  • Krarup, J., et al., 2006. Output from the Greenwood Traffic Speed Deflectometer. In: 22nd ARRB Conference, Canberra.
  • Lukanen, E.O., Stubstad, R., and Briggs, R.C., 2000. Temperature predictions and adjustment factors for asphalt pavement. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-085.
  • Manoharan, S., et al., 2018. A study of the structural performance of flexible pavements using traffic speed deflectometer. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 46 (3), 1280–1289.
  • Manoharan, S., Chai, G., and Chowdhury, S., 2020. Structural capacity assessment of queensland roads using traffic speed deflectometer data. Australian Journal of Civil Engineering, 18 (2), 219–230.
  • Maser, K., et al., 2017. Integration of traffic speed deflectometer and ground-penetrating radar for network-level roadway structure evaluation. Transportation Research Record, 2639, 55–63.
  • Molenaar, A.A.A., 2007. Prediction of fatigue cracking in asphalt pavements: Do we follow the right approach? Transportation Research Record, 2001, 155–162.
  • Muller, W.B., and Roberts, J., 2013. Revised approach to assessing traffic speed deflectometer data and field validation of deflection bowl predictions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (4), 388–402.
  • Nasimifar, M., et al., 2019. Pavement structural capacity from traffic speed deflectometer for network level pavement management system application. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (2), 456–465.
  • Nasimifar, M., et al., 2020. Temperature adjustment of surface curvature index from traffic speed deflectometer measurements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (11), 1408–1418.
  • Nielsen, C.P., 2019. Visco-elastic back-calculation of traffic speed deflectometer measurements. Transportation Research Record, 2673 (12), 439–448.
  • Peraka, N.S.P., and Biligiri, K.P., 2020. Pavement asset management systems and technologies: A review. Automation in Construction, 119, 103336.
  • Rasmussen, S., et al., 2008. A comparison of two years of network level measurements with the Traffic Speed Deflectometer. Transport Research Arena 2008, Ljubljana.
  • Roberts, J., et al., 2014. Traffic Speed Deflectometer: Data review and lessons learnt. Austroards Report No. AP-T279-14.
  • Shahin, M.Y., 1994. Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots. New York: Chapman & Hall.
  • Shrestha, S., et al., 2021. Pavement deterioration modeling and network-level pavement management using continuous deflection measurements. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 27 (3), 04021022.
  • Zofka, A., et al., 2014. Alternative approach for interpreting traffic speed deflectometer results. Transportation Research Record, 2457, 12–18.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.