A probabilistic model for field density distribution of asphalt pavements

References

• AASHTO R35, 2020. Standard practice for superpave volumetric design for asphalt mixtures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, standard.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO R9, 2005. Standard practice for acceptance sampling plans for highway construction. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, standard.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T312, 2019. Standard method of test for preparing and determining the density of asphalt mixture specimens by means of the superpave gyratory compactor. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, standard.
   Google Scholar
• Aschenbrener, T., and Tran, N., 2020. Optimizing in-place density through improved density specifications. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674 (3), 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bažant, Z.P., and Le, J.L., 2017. Probabilistic mechanics of quasibrittle structures: strength, lifetime, and size effect. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burati, J.L., et al., 2003. Optimal procedures for quality assurance specifications. McLean, VA: Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., et al., 2012. Application of discrete element method to superpave gyratory compaction. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (3), 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consuegra, A., et al., 1989. Comparative evaluation of laboratory compaction devices based on their ability to produce mixtures with engineering properties similar to those produced in the field. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1228, 80-87.
   Google Scholar
• Dessouky, S., Masad, E., and Bayomy, F., 2004. Prediction of hot mix asphalt stability using the superpave gyratory compactor. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 16 (6), 578–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, F.N., and Epps, J.A., 1980. Compaction of hot mix asphalt concrete. Bryan, TX: Texas Transportation Institute, the Texas A & M University System.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, F., et al., 2018. Using discrete element models to track movement of coarse aggregates during compaction of asphalt mixture. Construction and Building Materials, 189, 338–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddock, J.E., et al., 2020. Implementing the superpave 5 asphalt mixture design method in Indiana. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Harmelink, D.S., and Aschenbrener, T., 2002. In-place voids monitoring of hot mix asphalt pavements. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation, Research Branch.
   Google Scholar
• Hekmatfar, A., et al., 2015. Optimizing laboratory mixture design as it relates to field compaction to improve asphalt mixture durability. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, R.D., et al., 2012. Improving quality control of hot-mix asphalt paving with intelligent compaction technology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2268 (1), 82–91.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G., et al., 2016. Adjusting design air void Levels in Superpave mixtures to enhance durability. 6th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress. June 2016. Prague, Czech.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, C.S., 1989. Compaction of asphalt pavement. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis of Highway Practice, 152.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, M.M., Darabi, M.K., and Tabatabaee, N., 2019. A thermodynamic-based large deformation viscoplastic constitutive relationship for asphalt concrete compaction. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 165, 192-216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koneru, S., Masad, E., and Rajagopal, K.R., 2008. A thermomechanical framework for modeling the compaction of asphalt mixes. Mechanics of Materials, 40 (10), 846–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramers, H.A., 1940. Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reaction. Physica, 7, 284–304.
   Google Scholar
• Le, J.L., Marasteanu, M., and Turos, M., 2020. Mechanical and compaction properties of graphite nanoplatelet-modified asphalt binders and mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 21 (7), 1799–1814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden, R.N., Mahoney, J.P., and Jackson, N.C., 1989. Effect of compaction on asphalt concrete performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1217, 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Man, T., et al., 2022. Two-scale discrete element modeling of gyratory compaction of hot asphalt. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 148 (2), 04021140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marasteanu, M., et al., 2019. Experimental and computational investigations of high-density asphalt mixtures. St Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Masad, E., et al., 2014. Finite element modelling of field compaction of hot mix asphalt. Part I: theory. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (1), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moutier, F., 1974. La presse à cisaillement giratoire, modèle de série. Bulletin Liaison Ponts Chaussées, 74, 137–148.
   Google Scholar
• Risken, H., 1989. The fokker-planck equation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Stakston, A.D., Bahia, H.U., and Bushek, J.J., 2002. Effect of fine aggregate angularity on compaction and shearing resistance of asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789 (1), 14–24.
   Google Scholar
• Tadmor, E., and Miller, R.E., 2011. Modeling materials: continuum, atomistic and multiscale techniques. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Huerne, H.L., et al., 2008. Simulation of HMA compaction by using FEM. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (3), 153–163.
   Google Scholar
• Vavrik, W.R., and Carpenter, S.H., 1998. Calculating air voids at specified number of gyrations in superpave gyratory compactor. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1630 (1), 117–125.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Zhao, S., and Al-Qadi, I.L., 2019. Real-time monitoring of asphalt concrete pavement density during construction using ground penetrating radar: theory to practice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673 (5), 329–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T., et al., 2020. Evaluation of graphite nanoplatelets influence on the lubrication properties of asphalt binders. Materials, 13 (3), 772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T., et al., 2021b. Field density investigation of asphalt mixtures in Minnesota. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675 (9), 1670–1680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T., et al., 2022b. Development of superpave 5 asphalt mix designs for Minnesota pavements. St. Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, T., et al., 2022c. Relating N deisgn to field compaction – a case study in Minnesota. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2676 (5), 192–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, T., Marasteanu, M., and Le, J.L., 2021a. Mechanism-based evaluation of compactability of asphalt mixtures. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 22 (sup1), S482–S497.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, T., Marasteanu, M., and Le, J.L., 2022a. One-dimensional nonlocal model for gyratory compaction of hot asphalt mixtures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 148 (2), 04021144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Hastak, M., and Lee, J., 2018. Suitability of intelligent compaction for asphalt pavement quality control and quality assurance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144 (4), 04018006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar