Evaluation and prediction of interface fatigue performance between asphalt pavement layers: application of supervised machine learning techniques

References

• AL-Jarazi, R., et al., 2023. Development of prediction models for interlayer shear strength in asphalt pavement using machine learning and SHAP techniques. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 25 (8), 1720–1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Jarazi, R., et al., 2024. Interface Bonding Strength between Asphalt Pavement Layers under Mixed Shear-Tensile Mode: Laboratory Evaluation and Modeling Predictions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 36 (2), 04023565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alae, M., et al., 2020. Effects of layer interface conditions on top-down fatigue cracking of asphalt pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 21 (3), 280–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashteyat, A., et al., 2020. Compressive strength prediction of lightweight short columns at elevated temperature using gene expression programing and artificial neural network. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26 (2), 189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basheer, I.A., and Hajmeer, M., 2000. Artificial neural networks: Fundamentals, computing, design, and application. Journal of Methods Microbiological Journal of Microbiological Methods, 43 (1), 3–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., et al., 2019. Evaluation of fatigue cracking performance in a debonded asphalt pavement. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 12 (4), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0046-8.
   Google Scholar
• Code of China, 2004. Technical specifications for the construction of highway pavements. Beijing.: Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport.
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, A., and Tozzo, C., 2016. Interface stress state in the most common shear tests. Construction and Building Materials, 107, 341–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao, D.V., et al., 2022. Prediction of interlayer shear strength of double-layer asphalt using novel hybrid artificial intelligence models of ANFIS and metaheuristic optimizations. Construction and Building Materials, 323, 126595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt, A.H., 1999. Anti-reflective cracking design of (reinforced) asphaltic overlays. doctoral thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft, South Holland, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Diakhaté, M., et al., 2011. Experimental investigation of tack coat fatigue performance: Towards an improved lifetime assessment of pavement structure interfaces. Construction and Building Materials, 25 (2), 1123–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehsani, M., et al., 2023. Optimized prediction models for faulting failure of Jointed Plain concrete pavement using the metaheuristic optimization algorithms. Construction and Building Materials, 364, 129948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C., 2001. Gene Expression Programming: A New Adaptive Algorithm for Solving Problems. Complex Systems, 13 (2), 87–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C., 2006. Gene expression programming mathematical modeling by an artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gandomi, A.H., and Roke, D.A., 2015. Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools. Advances in Engineering Software, 88, 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, W., 2018. A comprehensive review on identification of the geomaterial constitutive model using the computational intelligence method. A comprehensive review on identification of the geomaterial constitutive model using the computational intelligence method. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 38, 420–440.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, C., Wang, F., and Zhong, Y., 2016. Assessing pavement interfacial bonding condition. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hun, M., Chabot, A., and Hammoum, F., 2012. A four-point bending test for the bonding evaluation of composite pavement.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E.N., Cole, M.K., and Pantelis, J., 2015. Tack coat testing – measuring field bond strength.
   Google Scholar
• Kara, I.F., 2013. Empirical modeling of shear strength of steel fiber reinforced concrete beams by gene expression programming. Neural Computing and Applications, 23 (3–4), 823–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khweir, K., and Fordyce, D., 2003. Influence of layer bonding on the prediction of pavement life. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 156 (2), 73–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., et al., 2011. Numerical and experimental analysis for the interlayer behavior of double-layered asphalt pavement specimens. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (1), 12–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, Z., et al., 2009. Interface bonding between hot-mix asphalt and various portland cement concrete surfaces: assessment of accelerated pavement testing and measurement of interface strain. Transportation Research Record, 2127 (1), 20–28.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., et al., 2017. Prediction models of mixtures’ dynamic modulus using gene expression programming. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (11), 971–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2009. Evaluation of bond strength of tack coat materials in field: Development of pull-off test device and methodology. Transportation Research Record, 2126, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., Raqib, M.A., and Huang, B., 2002. Influence of asphalt tack coat materials on interface shear strength. Transportation Research Record, 1789, 56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrzygłód, B., et al., 2020. Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural networks in a system for durability prediction of forging tools to forgings made of C45 steel. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 109 (5–6), 1385–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nian, T., et al., 2022. Method to predict the interlayer shear strength of asphalt pavement based on improved back propagation neural network. Construction and Building Materials, 351, 128969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, H.I., and Kutay, M.E., 2014. An artificial neural network model for virtual Superpave asphalt mixture design. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (2), 151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partl, M.N., et al., 2008. Characterization of water sensitivity of asphalt mixtures with coaxial shear test. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 9 (2), 247–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., et al., 2015. The influence of age on interlayer shear properties. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (6), 559–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., El Halim, A.E.H.O.A., and Partl, M.N., 2013. Utilisation of artificial neural network for the analysis of interlayer shear properties. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 8 (2), 107–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., Partl, M.N., and El Halim, A.E.H.O.A., 2009. Evaluation of interlayer shear bond devices for asphalt pavements. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 4 (4), 186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, D., et al., 2020. Analysis of shear-torque fatigue test for bituminous pavement interlayers. Construction and Building Materials, 254, 119309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragni, D., et al., 2022. Investigation into fatigue life of interface bond between asphalt concrete layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 23 (10), 3371–3385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A., et al., 2017. State-of-the-art review of interface bond testing devices for pavement layers: toward the standardization procedure. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 31 (2), 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A., et al., 2019. Fatigue performance of interface bonding between asphalt pavement layers using four-point shear test set-up. International Journal of Fatigue, 121, 181–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman, A., Huang, H., and Ai, C., 2021. Effect of shear stresses on asphalt pavement performance and evaluating debonding potential under repeated loading: Numerical study. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 147 (3), 04021023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raposeiras, A.C., et al., 2013. Test methods and influential factors for analysis of bonding between bituminous pavement layers. Construction and Building Materials, 43, 372–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roffe, J.C., and Chaignon, F., 2002. Characterisation tests on bond coats: Worldwide study, impact, tests, recommendations. In: In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bituminous Mixtures and Pavements. Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Romanoschi, S.A., and Metcalf, J.B., 2001. Characterization of asphalt concrete layer interfaces. Transportation Research Record, 1778 (1), 132–139.
   Google Scholar
• Salinas, A., et al., 2013. Interface layer tack coat optimization. Transportation Research Record, 2372, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Seitllari, A., and Kutay, M.E., 2023. Investigation of the fatigue life relationship among different geometry combinations of the 3-point bending cylinder (3PBC) fatigue test for asphalt concrete. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 24 (1), 2159402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., et al., 2016. Laboratory investigation of interlayer shear fatigue performance between open-graded friction course and underlying layer. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 381–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman, L., Director, W., and Papagiannakis, T., 2006. Evaluation of the influence of tack coat construction factors on the bond strength between pavement layers. Washington Center for Bituminous Technology, Report No. WCAT 06-002.
   Google Scholar
• Tenpe, A.R., and Patel, A., 2020. Application of genetic expression programming and artificial neural network for prediction of CBR. Road materials and pavement design, 21 (5), 1183–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozzo, C., Fiore, N., and D’Andrea, A., 2014. Dynamic shear tests for the evaluation of the effect of the normal load on the interface fatigue resistance. Construction and Building Materials, 61, 200–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzan, J, Livneh, M, and Eshed, Y., 1978. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. In: In Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proc.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, A., et al., 2011. Research and assessment of asphalt layers bonding. The Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 6 (3), 210–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bjrbe.2011.27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R.C., Zhang, J., and Moore, J., 2005. Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers. No. NCAT Report 05-08. Auburn University. National Center for Asphalt Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Yao, K., et al., 2024. Influence of bonding condition of different interfaces on the mechanical responses and failure mode of asphalt pavement. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 51 (6), 640–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar