Collectivism and employment relations in Denmark: underpinning economic and social success

References

• Auer, P., ed. 2000. Employment Revival in Europe: Labour Market Success in Austria, Denmark, Ireland, and the Netherlands. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, P. 2010. “What’s in a Name? The Rise (And Fall?) of Flexicurity.” Journal of Industrial Relations 52 (3): 371–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185610365646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belchamber, G. 2010. “Flexicurity: What Is It? Can It Work Downunder?” Australian Bulletin of Labour 36 (3): 278–303.
   Google Scholar
• Berlingske, T. 2015. “USA-økonom: Norden Er Et Forbillede.” In Berlingske Tidende, 9 January Berlingske Business. 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchflower, D. G., A. Bryson, and J. Forth. 2006. “Workplace Industrial Relations in Britain, 1980–2004.” IZA Discussion Paper, No. 2518 December, Institute for the Study of Labour.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W., S. Deakin, and S. Ryan. 1997. “The Effects of British Industrial Relations Legislation 1979–1997.” National Institute Economic Review 161 (1): 69–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002795019716100105.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., and O. K. Pedersen. 2007. “The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success: Denmark in the Global Economy.” Comparative Political Studies 40 (3): 307–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006286542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clegg, H. A. 1976. Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining: A Theory Based on Comparisons of Six Countries. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dølvik, J. E. 2016. “The Danes’ Uneasy Relationship between Collective Bargaining and Legislation in Implementing EU Workers’ Rights.” In Den Danske Model Set Udefra, edited by T. P. Larsen and A. Ilsøe, 103–126. Copenhagen: FAOS.
   Google Scholar
• Dølvik, J. E., P. Marginson, K. Alsos, J. Arnholtz, G. Meardi, T. Müller, and S. Trygstad. 2018. “Collective Wage Regulation in Northern Europe under Strain: Multiple Drivers of Change and Differing Responses.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 24 (4): 321–339. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X18790815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Due, J., and J. S. Madsen. 1996. Forligsmagerne. Copenhagen: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Due, J., J. S. Madsen, C. Strøby Jensen, and L. K. Petersen. 1994. The Survival of the Danish Model. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dyreborg, J. 2011. “Safety Matters Have Become Too Important for Management to Leave It up to the Workers’ – The Nordic OSH Model between Implicit and Explicit Frameworks.” Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 1 (1): 135–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v1i1.2339.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. 2006. “Flexicurity. A Model that Works.” The Economist, 7 September.
   Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, D., C. Fagan, and G. Hebson, eds. 2017. Making Work More Equal: A New Labour Market Segmentation Approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halkjær, J. L., and T. Bredgaard. 2015. “’Arbejdsgiverne Og Flexicurity’.” In Dansk Flexicurity: Fleksibilitet Og Sikkerhed På Arbejdsmarkedet, edited by T. Bredgaard and P. Kongshøj Madsen, 187–212. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and D. Soskice, eds. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., and D. W. Gingerich. 2009. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Political Economy: An Empirical Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 449–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, R., B. Hvinden, and M. A. Schoyen. 2016. “The Nordic Welfare Model in the Twenty-First Century: The Bumble-Bee Still Flies!” Social Policy and Society 15 (1): 57–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746415000135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høgedahl, L. 2019. Den Danske Model I Den Offentlige Sektor. Danmark I Et Nordisk Perspektiv. Copenhagen: DJØF Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Høgedahl, L. K. 2020. The Danish Labour Market Model: Is the Bumblebee Still Flying? Oxford [forthcoming]: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Høgedahl, L. K., and E. Rasmussen. 2020. “Can Individual Employment Protections and Personal Grievances Be an Option in the Danish Labour Market?” Paper, Department of Politics and Society, Aalborg University [forthcoming].
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, C. L., and S. E. Navrbjerg. 2019. “Adapting to Survive: The Case of Danish Employers’ Organisations.” Human Resource Management Journal 29 (1): 36–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibsen, F. 2012. “’Almengørelse Af Overenskomsterne – Et Støtteben Til Den Danske Model.” Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 14 (2): 67–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/tfa.v14i2.108907.
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, F., and H. Jørgensen. 1979. ’Fagbevægelse Og Stat: Den Faglige Kamp, Statsindgreb Og Indkomstpolitik 1930–1978. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, F., L. Høgedahl, and S. Scheuer. 2011. Kollektiv handling. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, F., L. Høgedahl, and S. Scheuer. 2013. “Free Riders: The Rise of Alternative Unionism in Denmark.” Industrial Relations Journal 44 (5–6): 444–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12027.
   Google Scholar
• Ilsøe, A. 2012. “The Flip Side of Organised Decentralisation.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 50 (4): 760–781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2011.00875.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, T. 1996. “Power, Flexibility, and the Breakdown of Centralized Wage Bargaining: Denmark and Sweden in Comparative Perspective.” Comparative Politics 28 (4): 399–436. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/422051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, R. 2013. “Flexicurity. The Model that Never Was.”’ Social Europe, 6 December. Accessed 11 April 2016. www.socialeurope.eu/2013/12/flexicurity-model-never/
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, P. 2013. How to Be Danish. London: Short Books.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, H. 1995. Employee Participation in Europe. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen, H., and J. Lind. 2018. “The Decline of the Danish Models of Labour Market Regulation.” New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations 43 (1): 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, P. H., and K. Lilja, eds. 2011. Nordic Capitalisms and Globalisation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, J. 2013. Aftalemodellen Og Dens Europæiske Udfordringer. Copenhagen: Jurist-og Økonomforbundets Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lind, J., and H. Knudsen. 2018. “Denmark: The Long-lasting Class Compromise.” Employee Relations 40 (4): 580–599. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2017-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macky, K. 2018. “Strategic People Management – Where Have We Come from and Where are We Going?” In The Big Issues in Employment, edited by J. Parker and M. Baird, 203–223. Auckland: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, P. K. 2004. “The Danish Model of ‘Flexicurity’: Experiences and Lessons.” Transfer 10 (2): 187–207. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890401000205.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, P. K. 2014. “The Danish Road to ‘Flexicurity’: Where are We Compared to Others? And How Did We Get There?” In Flexibility and Employment Security in Europe, edited by R. Muffels, 341–362. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. J. 2005. “Corporatism from the Firm Perspective: Employers and Social Policy in Denmark and Britain.” British Journal of Political Science 35 (1): 127–148. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123405000062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, D., and R. Lindahl. 2010. “Out in the Cold? Flexible Integration and the Political Status of Euro Opt-outs.” European Union Politics 11 (4): 485–509. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510382463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navrbjerg, S. E., T. P. Larsen, and M. M. Johansen. 2010. “Tillidsrepræsentanten I Det 21. Århundrede: Sammenfatning Af TR-undersøgelsen 2010.” Tillidsrepræsentantundersøgelsen 2010, Report 6, Copenhagen: Landsorganisationen i Danmark
   Google Scholar
• Noe, R. A., J. R. Hollenbeck, and B. Gerhart. 2019. Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2004. Economic Outlook 2004. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2017. “Public Expenditure on Active Labour Market Policies per Unemployed: As a Percentage of GDP per Capita.” Economic Policy Reforms 2017: Going for growth. OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. OECD Employment Outlook 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, F. H. 2020a. “Livskvalitet: Vores Økonomi Er Bundsolid, Men Hvor Rigt Er Vores Liv Egentlig?” Politiken, 25 January, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, F. H. 2020b. “Danske Økonomer Går Solo Med Stigende Optimisme.” Politiken, 19 June, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E. 2016. “A Comparative Perspective on Collective Bargaining and the Role of Employers.” In Den Danske Model Set Udefra, edited by T. P. Larsen and A. Ilsøe, 303–322. Copenhagen: FAOS.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, E., P. O’Neil, and P. Chalmers. 2006. “International Experiences of Partnership.” Research Report. 148. Wellington: Partnership Resource Centre, NZ Department of Labour. (There is also a 22 page Summary Report).
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, S., and P. K. Madsen. 2017. “’Platformsøkonomien Og Prekariatet.” Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 19 (1): 46–62. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/tfa.v19i1.109077.
   Google Scholar
• Refslund, B., and O. H. Sørensen. 2016. “Islands in the Stream? Challenges and Resilience of the Danish Industrial Relations Model in a Liberalising World.” Industrial Relations Journal 47 (5–6): 530–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swenson, P. 1991. “Bringing Capital Back In, or Social Democracy Reconsidered: Employer Power, Cross-class Alliances, and Centralization of Industrial Relations in Denmark and Sweden.” World Politics: A Quarterly Journal of International Relations 43 (4): 513–544. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. 2018. “Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (4): 938–953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, F. 1995. “Farewell to Labour Market Associations?” In Organized Industrial Relations in Europe: What Future?, edited by C. Crouch and F. Traxler, 3–19. Aldershot: Avebury.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, J. 2019. “ICTWSS Database. Version 6.0.” Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies, University of Amsterdam. Accessed May 2019 http://www.uva-aias.net/en/ictwss
   Google Scholar
• Welfare Expert Advisory Group. 2019. “Employment and Labour Market.” Report, Wellington, Accessed June 2020 www.Employment-and-Labour-market-010419.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilthagen, T. 1998. “Flexicurity: A New Paradigm for Labour Market Policy Reform?” WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS I 98-202.
   Google Scholar
• Wilthagen, T., and F. H. Tros. 2004. “The Concept of Flexicurity: A New Approach to Regulating Employment and Labour Markets.” Transfer 10 (2): 166–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890401000204.
   Google Scholar
• Woolridge, A. 2013. “Northern Lights: Special Report on the Nordic Countries.” The Economist. 2/2.
   Google Scholar