Advanced search
Publication Cover
Labour and Industry
A journal of the social and economic relations of work
Volume 31, 2021 - Issue 3: Global Lessons for Stronger Collective Bargaining Systems
Submit an article Journal homepage
392
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Workers’ security across the lifecycle: bargaining, skills, and social services

The Ghent system of social insurance: a model for Australia?

Russell D. LansburyWork and Organisational Studies, University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 312-319 | Received 07 Oct 2020, Accepted 01 Jul 2021, Published online: 12 Jul 2021

References

  • Andersen, S. K., S. Kaine, and R. D. Lansbury. 2017. “Decentralised Bargaining in Denmark and Australia: Voluntarism versus Legal Regulation.” Australian Bulletin of Labour 42 (1): 45–70.
  • Auer, P. 2010. “What’s in a Name: The Rise (And Fall?) of Flexicurity.” Journal of Industrial Relations 52 (3): 371–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185610365646.
  • Bandau, F. 2017. Storming Labor’s Last Strongholds: Union Decline and the Partisan Politics of the Ghent System. Germany: Working Paper, Department of Political Science, University of Bamberg.
  • Belchamber, G. 2010. “Flexicurity: What Is It? Can It Work down Under?” Australian Bulletin of Labour 36 (3): 278–303.
  • Bockerman, P., and R. Uusitalo. 2006. “Erosion of the Ghent System and Union Membership Decline: Lessons from Finland.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 44 (2): 283–303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00498.x.
  • De Deken, J. 2011. “Belgium: A Precursor in Muddling Through?” In Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe, edited by J. Classen and D. Clegg, 100–120. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hoegedahl, L. 2004. “The Ghent Effect for Whom? Mapping the Variations of the Ghent Effect across Different Trade Unions in Denmark.” Industrial Relations Journal 45 (6): 469–485. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12072.
  • Howe, B., P. Munro, J. Biddington, and S. Charlesworth. 2012. Lives on Hold: Unlocking the Potential of Australia’s Workforce. The Report of the Independent Inquiry into Insecure Work in Australia. Melbourne: ACTU.
  • Ibsen, F., L. Hogdahl, and S. Scheuer. 2013. “Free Riders: The Rise of Alternative Unions in Denmark.” Industrial Relations Journal 44 (5–6): 444–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12027.
  • Jensen, C. 2014. The Right and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Kjellberg, A. 2009. “The Swedish Ghent System and the Trade Unions under Pressure.” Transfer 15 (3–4): 481–504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589090150031601.
  • Koistenen, P., and J. Perkio. 2014. “Good and Bad Times of Social Innovation: The Case of Universal Basic Income in Finland.” Basic Income Studies 9: 25–57.
  • Pehkonnen, J., and H. Tanninen. 1997. “Institutions, Incentives and Trade Union Membership.” Labour: Review of Labour Economics and Industrial Relations 11 (3): 579–597. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00051.
  • Pontusson, J., and M. Rasmussen. 2016. Working Class Strength by Institutional Design? Unionisation, Partisan Politics and Unemployment Insurance Systems: 1870–2010. Working Paper, Department of Sociology, University of Geneva.
  • Rothstein, B. 1992. “Labour Market Institutions and Working-Class Strength.” In Structuring Politics: Historic Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, edited by S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, and F. H. Longstreth, 33–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scott, A. 2016. A Proposal for Unemployment Insurance: A Research Report for Jobs Australia. Melbourne: Jobs Australia.
  • Van Rie, T., I. Marx, and J. Horemans. 2011. “Ghent Revisited: Unemployment Insurance and Union Membership in Belgium and the Nordic Countries.” European Journal of Industrial Relations 17 (2): 125–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680111400895.
  • Vandaele, K. 2006. “A Report from the Homeland of the Ghent System: Unemployment and Union Membership in Belgium.” Transfer 12 (4): 647–657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/102425890601200417.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.