It’s positioned desires, stupid! The role of desires in impactful methodologies for enterprise research

References

• Albert, K., J. S. Brundage, P. Sweet, and F. Vandenberghe. 2020. “Towards a Critical Realist Epistemology?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 50 (3): 357–372. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhojärvi, T. 2020. “Critical Gibson-Graham: Reading Capitalocentrism for Trouble.” Rethinking Marxism 32 (3): 286–309. doi:10.1080/08935696.2020.1780667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beurskens, K., M. Pilz, and L. Rekhviashvili. 2021. “Research Ethics and Inequalities of Knowledge Production in Eastern Europe and Eurasia.” In Research Ethics in Human Geography, edited by S. Henn, J. Miggelbrink, and K. Hörschelmann, 92–113. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2000. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 3rd edn ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2009. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2011. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2013. “Theorising Ontology.” In Contributions to Social Ontology. (Routledge Studies in Critical Realism), edited by C. Lawson, J. S. Latsis, and N. Martins, 192–204. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., and H. W.-C. Yeung. 2015. Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Curry, G. N. 2005. “Reluctant Subjects or Passive Resistance? A Commentary on J.K. Gibson-Graham’s “Surplus Possibilities: Postdevelopment and Community Economies”.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 26 (2): 127–131. doi:10.1111/j.0129-7619.2005.00209.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicken, P., P. F. Kelly, K. Olds, and H. Wai-Chung Yeung. 2001. “Chains and Networks, Territories and Scales: Towards a Relational Framework for Analysing the Global Economy.” Global Networks 1 (2): 89–112. doi:10.1111/1471-0374.00007.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1994) Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.31025.0001.001.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. (New Ecologies for the twenty-first Century). Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2004. “Area Studies after Poststructuralism.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 36 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1068/a3652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2005. “Surplus Possibilities: Postdevelopment and Community Economies.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 26 (1): 4–26. doi:10.1111/j.0129-7619.2005.00198.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2008. “Diverse Economies: Performative Practices for `other Worlds.” Progress in Human Geography 32 (5): 613–632. doi:10.1177/0309132508090821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2019. “Community Economies.” In Pluriverse: A post-development Dictionary, edited by A. Kothari, 127–130. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., J. Cameron, S. Healy, and J. McNeill. 2019. “Roepke Lecture in Economic Geography—Economic Geography, Manufacturing, and Ethical Action in the Anthropocene.” Economic Geography 95 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1538697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., and K. Dombroski. 2020. “Introduction to the Handbook of Diverse Economies: Inventory as Ethical Intervention.” In The Handbook of Diverse Economies, edited by J. K. Gibson-Graham and K. Dombroski, 1–24. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. 2003. “Being There and There and There! Reflections on Multi-Site Ethnography.” Ethnography 4 (2): 201–216. doi:10.1177/14661381030042003.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “Situated Knowledges. The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, S. 2010. “Traversing Fantasies, Activating Desires: Economic Geography, Activist Research, and Psychoanalytic Methodology.” The Professional Geographer 62 (4): 496–506. doi:10.1080/00330124.2010.501266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., P. Dicken, M. Hess, N. Coe, and H. W.-C. Yeung. 2002. “Global Production Networks and the Analysis of Economic Development.” Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 436–464. doi:10.1080/09692290210150842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibert, O., M. Hess, J. Kleibert, F. Müller, and D. Power. 2019. “Geographies of Dissociation: Value Creation, ‘Dark’ Places, and ‘Missing’ Links.” Dialogues in Human Geography 9 (1): 43–63. doi:10.1177/2043820619831114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleibert, J. M., M. Hess, and F. C. Müller. 2020. “Sites of Contestation in Global Fur Networks.” Geoforum 108 (3): 39–48. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.11.009.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzhabekova, A. 2020. “Invisibilizing Eurasia: How North–South Dichotomization Marginalizes Post-Soviet Scholars in International Research Collaborations.” Journal of Studies in International Education 24 (1): 113–130. doi:10.1177/1028315319888887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Bellacasa, M. P. D. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106. doi:10.1177/0306312710380301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. 1989. “Postmodernism, Marxism, and Locality Research: The Contribution of Critical Realism to the Debate.” Antipode 21 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1989.tb00176.x.
   Google Scholar
• Minasny, B., D. Fiantis, B. Mulyanto, Y. Sulaeman, and W. Widyatmanti. 2020. “Global Soil Science Research Collaboration in the 21st Century: Time to End Helicopter Research.” Geoderma 373 (9): 114299. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114299.
   Google Scholar
• Moosavi, L. 2020. “The Decolonial Bandwagon and the Dangers of Intellectual Decolonisation.” International Review of Sociology 30 (2): 332–354. doi:10.1080/03906701.2020.1776919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, N. 2008. “Molecular Embodiments and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography.” Social Studies of Science 38 (2): 163–199. doi:10.1177/0306312707082969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, P. (2020) ‘Ty Lewaku!’: Resisting right wing populism in contemporary Poland. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/43822720/Ty_Lewaku_Resisting_right_wing_populism_in_co%20ntemporary_Poland (Accessed 20 October 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Petrescu, D., C. Petcou, M. Safri, and K. Gibson. 2021. “Calculating the Value of the Commons: Generating Resilient Urban Futures.” Environmental Policy and Governance 31 (3): 159–174. doi:10.1002/eet.1890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quraishi, M., L. Irfan, M. Schneuwly Purdie, and M. L. N. Wilkinson. 2022. “Doing ‘Judgemental Rationality’ in Empirical Research: The Importance of depth-reflexivity When Researching in Prison.” Journal of Critical Realism 21 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1080/14767430.2021.1992735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuram, P., and C. Madge. 2006. “Towards a Method for Postcolonial Development Geography? Possibilities and Challenges.” Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 27 (3): 270–288. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9493.2006.00262.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 1993. “Postmodernist Thought in Geography: A Realist View.” Antipode 25 (4): 320–344. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.1993.tb00222.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, B. 2020. Making Transformative Geographies: Lessons from Stuttgart’s Community Economy. Sozial- und Kulturgeographie. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Suyarkulova, M. (2018) “Renegade research”: hierarchies of knowledge production in Central Asia, 10 December. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/renegade-research/ Accessed: 5 March 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Suyarkulova, M. (2019) A view from the margins: alienation and accountability in Central Asian studies, 10 October. Available at: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/odr/view-margins-alienation-and-accountability-central-asian-studies/ Accessed: 5 March 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Tlostanova, M. 2012. “Postsocialist ≠ Postcolonial? on post-Soviet Imaginary and Global Coloniality.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 48 (2): 130–142. doi:10.1080/17449855.2012.658244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, H. W.-C. 2019. “Rethinking Mechanism and Process in the Geographical Analysis of Uneven Development.” Dialogues in Human Geography 9 (3): 226–255. doi:10.1177/2043820619861861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar