The rules of engagement: talkback radio audiences’ understandings of the conditions of access to programs

References

• Adams, P., and L. Burton. 1997. Talkback: Emperors of the Air. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C., and T. Dirmann. 1999. “The Myth of Electronic Populism: Talk Radio and the Decline of the Public Sphere.” Democracy & Nature: The International Journal of Inclusive Democracy 5 (1): 65–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J. 2000. “Dangerously Radioactive: The Plural Vocalities of Radio.” In Culture and Text: Discourse and Methodology in Social Research and Cultural Studies, edited by C. Poynton and A. Lee, 59–80. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Crittenden, J. 1971. “Democratic Functions of the Open Mike Radio Forum.” Public Opinion Quarterly 35 (2): 200–210.10.1086/267891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, S., and G. Turner. 2007. “Jonestalk: The Specificity of Alan Jones.” Media International Australia: Incorporating Culture and Policy 122: 132–149.
   Google Scholar
• Dori-Hacohen, G. 2012. “Gatekeeping Public Participation: An Ethnographic Account of the Production Process of a Radio Phone-in Programme.” The Radio Journal: International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media 10 (2): 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Ewart, J.  2014. “Local People, Local Places, Local Voices, Local Spaces: How Talkback Radio in Australia Provides Hyper-local News Through Mini Narrative Sharing.” Journalism 15 (6): 790–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, R. 2007. “The Role of Talkback Radio in Hong Kong and Singapore: An Initial Exploration.” Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy 124: 87–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gillman, S. 2007. “‘Stay on Line…’: An Analysis to Callers to Talkback Radio in Australia.” Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy 122: 186–196.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, L. 1999. “Storyline and the Multicultural Middlebrow: Reading Women's Culture on National Public Radio.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 16: 329–349.10.1080/15295039909367099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilmes, M. 2002. “Rethinking Radio.” In Radio Reader: Essays in the Cultural History of Radio, edited by M. Hilmes and J. Loviglio, 1–19. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick, R. 2006. “I’m the One That’s Lead This Charge: Alan Jones, Cronulla, and the Theatre of White Australia.” Paper presented at UnAustralia, The Cultural Studies Association of Australasia’s Annual Conference, December 6–8. Accessed June 5, 2008. http://www.unaustralia.com/proceedings.php#papers
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, J., and R. S. Barbour. 1999. “Introduction: The Challenge and Promise of Focus Groups.” In Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, edited by R. Barbour and J. Kitzinger, 1–20. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lunt, P., and P. Stenner. 2005. “The Jerry Springer Show as an Emotional Public Sphere.” Media, Culture & Society 27 (1): 59–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, J. 1996. “The Rhetoric of Political Talkback Radio in New Zealand: Combustion or Coherence?” Australian Journal of Communication 23 (2): 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, M., S. Forde, J. Ewart, and K. Foxwell. 2007. Community Media Matters. Brisbane: Griffith University.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, S. 2000.“ Understanding Irish Talk Radio: A Qualitative Case Study of the Gerry Ryan Show. ” PhD diss., University College Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, S. 2005. "‘The Whole Nation is Listening to You’: The Presentation of the Self on a Tabloid Talk Radio Show.” Media, Culture & Society 27 (5): 719–738.
   Google Scholar
• Tebbutt, J. 2006. “Formats: Performance and Affect in Talkback Radio.” Southern Review 38 (2): 86–101.
   Google Scholar
• Thornborrow, J., and R. Fitzgerald. 2013. “‘Grab a Pen and Paper’ Interaction v. Interactivity in a Political Radio Phone-in.” Journal of Language and Politics 12 (1): 1–28.10.1075/jlp.12.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ytreberg, E. 2004. “Formatting Participation within Broadcast Media Production.” Media, Culture & Society 26 (5): 677–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar