Imagined interactions and identity in the works of Joss Whedon

References

• Battis, J. 2003. ““She’s Not All Grown Yet”: Willow as Hybrid/Hero in Buffy the Vampire Slayer.” The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 8 (2.4).
   Google Scholar
• Blood, D. J., and P. C. B. Phillips. 1997. “Economic Headline News on the Agenda: New Approaches to Understanding Causes and Effects.” In Communication and Democracy: Exploring the Intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting Theory, edited by M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, and D. Weaver, 97–114. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., J. M. Honeycutt, and A. J. Vickery. 2013. “An Analysis of the Correspondence between Imagined Interaction Attributes and Functions.” Human Communication Research 39: 157–183. doi:10.1111/hcre.12003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G. 1972. “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 58 (4): 396–407.10.1080/00335637209383138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, E. G., R. L. Knutson, and K. Musolf. 1997. “Why Do People Share Fantasies? An Empirical Investigation of a Basic Tenet of the Symbolic Convergence Communication Theory.” Communication Studies 48: 254–276.10.1080/10510979709368504
   Google Scholar
• Buckman, A. 2010. ““Go Ahead! Run Away! Say It Was Horrible”: Dr. Horrible’s Sing-along Blog as Resistant Text.” Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 29 (8.1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, T. 2012. ““past the Brink of Tacit Support”: Fan Activism and the Whedonverses.” Transformative Works and Cultures 10. http://journal.transformativeworks.org/index.php/twc/article/view/331/295.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. 2010. “Exploitation of Bodies and Minds in Season One of Dollhouse.” In Sexual Rhetoric in the Works of Joss Whedon, edited by E. B. Waggoner, 226–238. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., J. M. Honeycutt, and K. S. Zagacki. 1988. “Imagined interaction as an element of social cognition.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 52 (1): 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. 1956. “The Problem of Ego Identity.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 4: 56–121.10.1177/000306515600400104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. 1994. Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, NY: WW Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. R. 1987. Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action. Colombia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. 1987/2011. Television Culture. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, L. 2011. ““Is She Cold?” Telaesthetic Horror and Embodied Textuality in “The Body”.” Slayage: The journal of the Whedon Studies Association 33 (9.1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbner, G., L. Gross, M. Morgan, N. Signorielli, and J. Shanahan. 2002. “Growing up with Television: Cultivation Processes.” In Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by J. Bryant and D. Zillmann, 43–67. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ginn, S. 2011. “Memory, Mind, and Mayhem: Neurological Tampering and Manipulation in Dollhouse.” Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 30 & 31 (8.2 & 8.3).
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1996. “Introduction: Who Needs Identity?” In Questions of Cultural Identity, edited by S. Hall and P. du Gay, 1–17. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. 2003. Imagined Interactions: Daydreaming about Communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. 2004. “Imagined Interaction Conflict-linkage Theory: Explaining the Persistence and Resolution of Interpersonal Conflict in Everyday Life.” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 23 (1): 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. 2010. “Introduction.” In Imagine That: Studies in Imagined Interaction, edited by Jame M. Honeycutt, 1–14. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M. 2014. “Imagined Interactions.” In Interpersonal Communication, edited by C. R. Berger and M. E. Roloff, 249–271. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., C. W. Choi, and J. R. DeBerry. 2009. “Communication Apprehension and Imagined Interactions.” Communication Research Reports 26 (3): 228–236. doi:10.1080/08824090903074423.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., M. E. Pence, and C. C. Gearhart. 2013. “Using Imagined Interactions to Predict Covert Narcissism.” Communication Reports 26 (1): 26–38. doi:10.1080/08934215.2013.773051.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., K. S. Zagacki, and R. Edwards. 1990. “Imagined Interaction and Interpersonal Communication.” Communication Reports 3 (1): 1–8.10.1080/08934219009367494
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., and R. Wohl. 1956. “Mass Communication and Para-social Interaction: Observation on Intimacy at a Distance.” Psychiatry 19 (3): 215–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 1992. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2007. The Wow Climax: Tracing the Emotional Impact of Popular Culture. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jowett, L. 2014. “Stuffing a Rabbit in It: Character, Narrative, and Time in the Whedonverse.” In Reading Joss Whedon, edited by R. V. Wilcox, T. R. Cochran, C. Masson, and D. Lavery, 297–311. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, E., J. G. Blumler, and M. Gurevitch. 1973. “Uses and Gratifications Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 37 (4): 509–523.10.1086/268109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. 2010. ““The Status is Not Quo!”: Pursuing Resolution in Web-disseminated Serial Narrative.” Narrative 18 (3): 367–381.10.1353/nar.2010.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaver, T. 2013. “Joss Whedon, Dr. Horrible, and the Future of Web Media.” Popular Communication 11: 160–173. doi:10.1080/15405702.2013.779510.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, T. P., L. V. Porter, and A. Greule. 2016. “Parasocial Compensation Hypothesis: Predictors of Using Parasocial Relationships to Compensate for Real-life Interaction.” Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 35 (3): 258–279.10.1177/0276236615595232
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perdigao, L. K. 2011. ““This One’s Broken”: Rebuilding Whedonbots and Reprogramming the Whedonverse.” Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 30 & 31 (8.2 & 8.3).
   Google Scholar
• Postman, N. 1985. Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rabb, J. D., and J. M. Richardson. 2014. “Adventures in the Moral Imagination: Memory and Identity in Whedon’s Narrative Ethics.” In Reading Joss Whedon, edited by R. V. Wilcox, T. R. Cochran, C. Masson, and D. Lavery, 312–324. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. M., E. M. Perse, and R. A. Powell. 1985. “Loneliness, Parasocial Interaction, and Local Television News Viewing.” Human Communication Research 12 (2): 155–180.10.1111/hcre.1985.12.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, T. E. 2000. “Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century.” Mass Communication and Society 3 (1): 3–37.10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. 2009. “Sex, Secrets, and ‘Dollhouse’: Jos Whedon Talks about the End of His Fox Show.” Chicago Tribune. http://featuresblogs.chicagotribune.com/entertainment_tv/2009/12/dollhouse-fox-joss-whedon.html.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. J. 1996. Television’s Second Golden Age: From Hill Street Blues to ER. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Von Feilitzen, C. 1976. “The Functions Served by the Media.” In Children and Television, edited by R. Brown, 90–115. London: Collier-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Waggoner, E. B. 2010. “The Symbolic Gun in Willow’s Love Life.” In Sexual Rhetoric in the Works of Joss Whedon, edited by E. B. Waggoner, 7–17. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. 2005. Why Buffy Matters: The Art of Buffy the Vampire Slayer. New York: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. V. 2011. “Echoes of Complicity: Reflexivity and Identity in Joss Whedon’s Dollhouse.” Slayage: The Journal of the Whedon Studies Association 30 & 31 (8.2 & 8.3).
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. V. 2012. “Breaking the Ninth Wall with Dr. Horrible’s Sing-along Blog: Internet Creation.” CST Online. http://cstonline.tv/breaking-ninth-wall.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox, R. V., and D. Lavery. 2002. “Introduction.” In Fighting the Forces: What’s at Stake in Buffy the Vampire Slayer, edited by R. V. Wilcox and D. Lavery, xvii–xxix. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar