When the online backs the street – the making of digitized political emotion: a case study of the Romanian anti-government protests

References

• Borger, M., A. van Hoof, and J. Sanders. 2014. “Expecting Reciprocity: Towards a Model Pf Participant’s Perspective on Participatory Journalism.” New Media & Society 18 (4): 708–725. doi:10.1177/1461444814545842.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. 2007. “Produsage: Towards a Broader Framework for User-Led Content Creation.” Proceedings Creativity & Cognition, 6, Washington, DC. Accessed 28 January 2019. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/6623/1/6623.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caprentier, N. 2011. Media and Participation: A Site of Ideological-democratic Struggle. Bristol and Chicago: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Carthy, V., and F. G. R. Barron. 2019. “Social Movement and New Technology: The Dynamics of Cyber Activism in the Digital Age.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Social Movements, Revolution and Social Transformation, edited by B. Berberoglu, 373–397. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2015. Networks of Outrage and Hope. 2nd ed. New York: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Coman, C., and C. Camelia. 2014. “Framing Chevron Protests in National and International Press.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149: 228–232. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.222.
   Google Scholar
• Flann, H., and N. Doerr. 2015. “Visuals and Emotion in Social Movement.” In Methods of Exploring Emotions, edited by H. Flam and J. Kleres, 229–239. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, G. 2009. “Hiting Israel in the Field: On Ethnography and And Political Emotion.” Anthropological Theory 9 (1): 59–79. doi:10.1177/1463499609103547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heemeryck, A. 2010. L’importation Démocratique En Roumanie. Une Perspective Anthropologique Sur La Construction D’une Société Post-dictatoriale. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Heemeryck, A. 2018. “Social Movement and Civil Society in Post-communist Romania: Local Evolution, Global Comparison.” Anthropological Researches and Studies 8: 254–267. doi:10.26758/8.1.25.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kádár, D. Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interactions in Groups. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, R. 2005. “Challenging Audiences: Critical Ethnography In/for Oceania.” Anthropological Forum 15 (3): 319–328. doi:10.1080/00664670500281396.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, B. D., and D. Mercea. 2012. Social Media and Democracy: Innovation in Participatory Politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mărgărit, D. 2016. “Civic Disenchantment and Political Distress: The Case of the Romanian Autumn.” European Politics 32 (1): 46–62. doi:10.1080/21599165.2015.1129945.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. 2013. “A Feeling for Democracy? Rhetoric, Power and the Emotions.” Journal of Political Power 6 (3): 441–476. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2013.846557.
   Google Scholar
• Mercea, D. 2016. Civic Participation in Contentious Politics: The Digital Foreshadowing of Protest. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2011. The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, C., and J. Svensson. 2014. “Activism and Radical Politics in the Digital Age: Towards a Typology.” Convergence. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 22 (2): 131–146. doi:10.1177/1354856514553395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. 2007. “Political Activism: New Challenges, New Opportunities.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by C. Boix and S. C. Strokes, 628–649. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2002. “The Virtual Sphere. The Internet as Public Sphere.” New Media & Society 4 (1): 9–27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pătruț, M. 2017. “A #col(l)ectiv(e) Romanian Tragedy: A Case Study on Social Media Fighting Corruption.” BRAND: Broad Research in Accounting, Negotiation, and Distribution 8 (1): 38–46.
   Google Scholar
• Postill, J. 2014. “Democracy in an Age of Viral Reality: A Media Epidemiography of Spain’s Indignados Movement.” Ethnography 15 (1): 51–69. doi:10.1177/1466138113502513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, M. J., and A. Rigby. 2017. “Frontstage and Backstage Emotion Management in Civil Resistance.” Journal of Political Power 10 (2): 219–235. doi:10.1080/2158379X.2017.1336340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharis, Y. 2015. “The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation.” Social Media + Society. Accessed 28 January 2019. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2056305115610140
   Google Scholar
• Tufecki, Z. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. 2009. “Users like You? Theorizing Agency in Usergenerated Content.” Media, Culture & Society 31 (1): 41–58. doi:10.1177/0163443708098245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1987. Participation on America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C. 2013. “Emotions, Campaigns, and Political Participations.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (2): 414–428. doi:10.1177/1065912912449697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar