Intimate distractions: Fleabag’s manipulations of audience attention

References

• Acerbi, A. 2020. Cultural Evolution in the Digital Age. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Alphen, E. V. 2017. “Attention for Distraction: Modernity, Modernism, and Perception.” Text Matters 7 (7): 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Auter, P. J., and D. M. Davis. 1991. “When Characters Speak Directly to Viewers: Breaking the Fourth Wall in Television.” Journalism Quarterly 68 (½): 165–171. doi:10.1177/107769909106800117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, S. 2012. Authentic, TM: The Politics of Ambivalence in a Brand Culture. New York, NY: New York UP.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. S. 1986. “Distraction-Conflict Theory: Progress and Problems.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by L. Berkowitz, 1–40. vol. 19 ed. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. 1972. Mythologies. Trans. Annette Lavers. New York: Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, A., A. Ensslin, I. Van Der Bom, and J. Smith. 2019. “A Reader Response Method Not Just for ‘You’.” Language and Literature 28 (3): 241–262. doi:10.1177/0963947019859954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin, W. 1999. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction.” In Illuminations, edited by H. Arendt, H. Zorn, and Trans. 1936, 211–244. New York, NY: Pimli.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. 2018. Contemporary Fictions of Attention, Reading and Distraction in the Twenty-First Century. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Ebook.
   Google Scholar
• Berryman, R., and M. Kavka. 2018. “Crying on YouTube: Vlogs, Self-Exposure and the Productivity of Negative Affect.” Convergence 24 (1): 85–98. doi:10.1177/1354856517736981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, W. H. K. 2016a. “Big Data as Drama.” ELH 83 (2): 363–382. doi:10.1353/elh.2016.0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun, W. H. K. 2016b. Updating to Remain the Same: Habitual New Media. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeCarvalho, L. 2013. “Hannah and Her Entitled Sisters: Postfeminism, Postrecession, and Girls.” Feminist Media Studies 13 (2): 367–370. doi:10.1080/14680777.2013.771889.
   Google Scholar
• Di Betta, P. 2020. Fleabag’s Ethical Investigations. Seattle: Amazon Kindle.
   Google Scholar
• Doane, M. A. 2003. “The Close-Up: Scale and Detail in the Cinema.” Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 14 (3): 89–111. doi:10.1215/10407391-14-3-89.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. S. 2015. Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. S., and A. Kanai. 2019. “From “Can-do” Girls to Insecure and Angry: Affective Dissonances in Young Women’s Post-recessional Media.” Feminist Media Studies 19 (6): 771–786. doi:10.1080/14680777.2018.1546206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, S., and C. Driscoll. 2015. “HBO’s Girls: Gender, Generation, and Quality Television.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 29 (2): 253–262. doi:10.1080/10304312.2015.1022941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 2002. “The Challenge of Absent Presence.” In Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance, edited by J. E. Katz and M. A. Aakhus, 227–241. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, D. 1994. “Textual ‘You’ and Double Deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place.” Style 28 (3): 378–410. Fall.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesselberth, P. 2017. “Discourses on Disconnectivity and the Right to Disconnect.” New Media & Society 20 (5): 1994–2010. doi:10.1177/1461444817711449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holowka, E. M. 2018. “Between Artifice and Emotion: The “Sad Girls” of Instagram.” In Leadership, Popular Culture and Social Change, edited by K. Bezio and K. Yost, 183–195. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. vol. 1 ed. New York: Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Kacandes, I. 1993. “Are You in the Text?: The ’Literary Performative” in Postmodernist Fiction.” Text and Performance Quarterly 13: 139–153. doi:10.1080/10462939309366039.
   Google Scholar
• Kanai, A. 2017. “On Not Taking the Self Seriously: Resilience, Relatability and Humour in Young Women’s Tumblr Blogs.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 22 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, A. 2017a. “Girlfriendship and Sameness: Affective Belonging in a Digital Intimate Public.” Journal of Gender Studies 26 (3): 293–306. doi:10.1080/09589236.2017.1281108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, A., and R. Gill. 2018. “Mediating Neoliberal Capitalism: Affect, Subjectivity and Inequality.” Journal of Communication 68 (2): 318–326. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracauer, S. 1963. “Cult of Distraction. Über die Berliner Lichtspielhäuser.” In Das Ornament Der Masse, 311–317. Essays. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Labrecque, L. I., K. Swani, and A. T. Stephen. 2020. “The Impact of Pronoun Choices on Consumer Engagement Actions: Exploring Top Global Brands’ Social Media Communications.” In Psychol Mark 37 (6): 796–814.
   Google Scholar
• Landau, N. 2018. TV Writing on Demand: Creating Great Content in the Digital Era. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• McRobbie, A. 2009. The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Packard, G., and J. Berger. 2020. “Thinking of You: How Second-Person Pronouns Shape Cultural Success.” Psychological Science 31 (4): 397–407. doi:10.1177/0956797620902380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poletti, A. 2012. “Reading for Excess: Relational Autobiography, Affect and Popular Culture in Tarnation.” Life Writing 9 (2): 157–172. doi:10.1080/14484528.2012.667363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeside, J. 2016. “‘Am I Still a Feminist if I Watch Porn?’ Meet Phoebe Waller-Bridge, the British Lena Dunham.” In The Guardian, 08–07. Web. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2016/jul/08/phoebe-waller-bridge-fleabag-britains-lena-dunham
   Google Scholar
• Rettberg, J. W. 2001. “Do You Think You’re Part of This? Digital Texts and the Second Person Address”. Cybertext Yearbook, edited by M. Eskelinen and R.Koskimaa. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, A. 2019. “What Fleabag Gets Right about Mental Health that a Hundred Serious Dramas Don’t.” Digital Spy, May 22. Web. https://www.digitalspy.com/tv/a26895896/fleabag-mental-health-comedy/
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, J. 2016. Breaking the Fourth Wall: The Effects of Metareference and Direct Address in Fictional Narrative. Dissertation, Yale University. Web. https://cogsci.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/Thesis2016Schroeder.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sehgal, P. 2019. “How ‘Fleabag’ Seduces Us, Then Accuses Us.” NewYork Times Magazine, June 19. Web. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/19/magazine/fleabag-phoebe-waller-bridge.html
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1971. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” In On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings, edited by D. N. Levine, 324–339. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turkle, S. 2011. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• VanArendonk, K. 2019. “Fleabag Breaks the Fourth Wall and Then Breaks Our Hearts.” Vulture, May 23. Web. https://www.vulture.com/2019/05/fleabag-season-2-fourth-wall-ending.html#:~:text=She%20is%20both%20happy%20and,the%20margins%20of%20a%20story.
   Google Scholar
• Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., A. T. Hendricks, M. M. H. Pollmann, and R. Ling. 2019. “Phubbing Behavior in Conversations and Its Relation to Perceived Conversation Intimacy and Distraction: An Exploratory Observation Study.” Computers in Human Behavior 100: 35–47. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veel, K. 2011. “Information Overload and Database Aesthetics.” Comparative Critical Studies 8 (2–3): 307–319. doi:10.3366/ccs.2011.0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller-Bridge, F. 2019. Fleabag: The Scriptures. London, UK: Sceptre.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzo, R. 2016. “Precarious-girl Comedy: Issa Rae, Lena Dunham, and Abjection Aesthetics.” Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies 31 (92): 27–59. doi:10.1215/02705346-3592565.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, D. 2019. “Distancing Affect in Fleabag.” Alluvium. 7(5): Web. December 15. n-pag. https://www.alluvium-journal.org/2019/12/16/distancing-affect-in-fleabag/
   Google Scholar