The ‘poietic’ turn: creative arts research in the academy

References

• Alexander, V. D. 2018. “Heteronomy in the Arts Field: State Funding and British Arts Organizations.” The British Journal of Sociology 69 (1): 23–43. doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2020) “The Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification.” ( ANZSRC), Released 30/06/2020. Accessed 15/09/21 at:https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/classifications/australian-and-new-zealand-standard-research-classification-anzsrc/latest-release
   Google Scholar
• Axel, Nick. 2016. “Research Horizons.” The Research Turn, Volume Magazine 48, Accessed 12/09/2022, http://archis.org/volume/research-horizons/
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Stephen. 2015. “Living the Neo-liberal University.” European Journal of Education 50 (3): 258–261. doi:10.1111/ejed.12132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, Tom, and Elliot Eisner. 2012. Arts-based Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt, eds. 2007. Practice as Research: Approaches to Creative Arts Enquiry. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Estelle, and Barbara Bolt, eds. 2014. Material Inventions: Applying Creative Arts Research. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, Ruth. 1996. The Vulnerable Observer: Anthropology that Breaks Your Heart. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behar, Ruth. 2007. “Ethnography in a Time of Blurred Genres.” Anthropology and Humanism 32 (2): 145–155. doi:10.1525/ahu.2007.32.2.145.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Sharon. 2009. ‘The Academic Mode of Production’. In Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts, eds Hazel Smith and Roger T. Dean., 252–263. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Desmond. 2018. “The Primacy of Practice: Establishing the Terms of Reference of Creative Arts and Media Research.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty and Susan Kerrigan, 47-66. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Borgdorff, Henk. 2006. The Debate on Research in the Arts. Sensuous Knowledge 02. Bergen: National Academy of the Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, Paul. 2004. Material Thinking: The Theory and Practice of Creative Research. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Owen, and Kim Sawchuk. 2012. “Research Creation: Intervention, Analysis and “Family Resemblances”.” Canadian Journal of Communication 37 (1): 5–26. doi:10.22230/cjc.2012v37n1a2489.
   Google Scholar
• Chilton, G., and P. Leavy. 2014. “Arts-based Research Practice: Merging Social Research and the Creative Arts.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Patricia Leavy. USA: Oxford University Press: 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, Bronwyn, Michael Gottsche, and Bansel Peter. 2006. “The Rise and Fall of the Neo-liberal University.” European Journal of Education 41 (2): 305–319. doi:10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00261.x.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, John. 1934. Art as. Experience, New York: Pedigree Books.
   Google Scholar
• Duxbury, Lesley. Grierson, Elizabeth, and Diane Waite. 2008. Thinking through Practice: Art as Research in the Academy. Melbourne: RMIT Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Rosalind. 2020. “Why Do Academics Do Unfunded Research? Resistance, Compliance and Identity in the UK neo-liberal University.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1817891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisner, Elliot. 2002. The Arts and the Creation of Mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, Elliot. 2006. “Does Arts-Based Research Have a Future?” Studies in Art Education 48 (1): 9–18. doi:10.1080/00393541.2006.11650496.
   Google Scholar
• FitzSimons, Trish. 2015. ““I’ve Got to STOP Writing This (Adjective of Choice) Article and Get onto My Filmmaking”: Documentary Filmmaking as University Research – Some History and Case Studies.” Studies in Australasian Cinema 9 (2): 122–139. doi:10.1080/17503175.2015.1060009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1988. Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, Clifford. 1995. After the Fact: Two Countries, Four Decades, One Anthropologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Ross 2010. “The Known World.” TEXT Special issue, Symposium: Creative and practice-led research—current status, future plans, October. 2010
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Carole 1996. “Inquiry through Practice: Developing Appropriate Research Strategies’.” Accessed 2022: http://carolegray.net/Papers%20PDFs/ngnm.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greer, Stephen. 2021. “Funding Resilience: Market Rationalism and the UK’s “Mixed Economy” for the Arts.” Cultural Trends 30 (3): 222–240. doi:10.1080/09548963.2020.1852875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, Anna, and Amanda Ravetz, eds. 2005. Visualizing Anthropology. Bristol and Portland, OR: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grindal, Bruce. 1993. “The Spirit of Humanistic Anthropology.” Anthropology and Humanism 18 (2): 46–47. doi:10.1525/ahu.1993.18.2.46.
   Google Scholar
• Haseman, Brad. 2006. “A Manifesto for Performative Research.” Media International Australia 118 (1): 98–106. doi:10.1177/1329878X0611800113.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim 2010. “Bringing Things to Life: Creative Entanglements in a World of Materials.” ESRC National Centre for Research Methods NCRM Working Paper Series 05/10.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, Michael. 2013. Lifeworlds: Essays in Existential Anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kälvemark, Torsten. 2010. “University Politics and Practice-based Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, ed. Michael Biggs , Henrik Karlsson and Stiftelsen Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, (Abingdon: Routledge, 24 Sep 2010), accessed 12 Sep 2022, 3–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørup, Søren. 2010. “Pleading for Plurality: Artistic and Other Kinds of Research.” In The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, ed. Michael Biggs , Henrik Karlsson and Stiftelsen Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (Abingdon: Routledge, 24 Sep 2010). 24–43. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klee, Paul 1961.“The Thinking Eye”.New York, (Notebooks volume 1). edited by, Jurg Spiller. Lund Humphries: London George Wittenborn.
   Google Scholar
• Langer, Susanne. 1957. Problems of Art: Ten Philosophical Lectures. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Larkins, Frank, and Gwilym Croucher. 2013. “Research.” In The Dawkins Revolution: 25 Years On, edited by Gwilym Croucher, Simon Marginson, Andrew Norton, and Julie Wells, 248–265. Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, C. F. G. 2006. “Will the Universities Survive the European Integration? Higher Education Policies in the EU and in the Netherlands before and after the Bologna Declaration.” Sociologia Internationalis 44 (4): 123–151.
   Google Scholar
• Loveless, Natalie. 2019. How to Make Art at the End of the World: A Manifesto for Research Creation. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, Erin. 2016. “Ten Propositions for Research-Creation.” In Collaboration in Performance Practice: Premises, Workings and Failures, edited by N. Colin and S. Sachsenmaier, 133–141: Palgrave MacMillan. doi:10.1057/9781137462466.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E, and Michael F. Fischer. 1986. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, Shaun. 1998. Art-based Research. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, Shaun. 2013. Art as Research. Bristol: Intellect.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, Cleo, and Tom Murray. 2019. “Visual and screen-based Research Methodologies.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. edited by George W. Noblit, Online accessed 12 September 2022, London: Oxford University Press . doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1196.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, Kirin. 2012. “Alive in the Writing.” In Crafting Ethnography in the Company of Chekhov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga. 2010. Foreword to the Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts, eds Michael Biggs and Henrik Karlsson. Abingden: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264239012-en.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, M. (2008) 'Transnational refugees: the transformative role of art?', ForumQualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2). http://l/160.45.170.223:90/ojs_fqslindex.php/fqs/article/view/403/873
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan, John P, and John Gray. 2018. “The Bureaucratic Distortion of Academic Work: A Transdisciplinary Analysis of the UK Research Excellence Framework in the Age of Neoliberalism.” Language and Intercultural Communication 18 (5): 533–548. doi:10.1080/14708477.2018.1501847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkovic, Josko. 2014. “Scoping the Australian Research Council’s for 1902 Category – Film, Television and Digital Media.” Interactive Media e-Journal of the National Academy of Screen and Sound, no. 10. Accesses 12 September 2022 http://sphinx.murdoch.edu.au/~20100408/nass_uat/issue10/IM10-SPARC-article-01-petkovic.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pick, David. 2008. “Towards a ‘Post-Public Era’? Shifting Frames in German and Australian Higher Education Policy.” Higher Education Quarterly. 0951–5224 62 1/2: 3–19. 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2008.00383.x.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, Sarah. 2009. “.” In Doing Sensory Ethnography, . London: SAGE Publications . doi:10.4135/9781446249383.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday & Company.
   Google Scholar
• REF (2012) Panel Criteria and Working Methods [online]. Available from: https://www.ref.ac.uk/2014/media/ref/content/pub/panelcriteriaandworkingmethods/01_12.pdf Accessed 070921.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, Laurel. 2000. “Writing: A Method of Inquiry.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N.K Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, 923–948. 2nd ed. Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff, Irit. 2008. “Turning.” E-flux Journal 00 Accessed 010921 November 2008 https://www.e-flux.com/journal/00/68470/turning/
   Google Scholar
• Rossmanith, Kate. 2022. “‘Ditching the New Yorker Voice’.”Sydney Review of Books. 2022 . Republished by Public Books. 2022 . Accessed 12 September 2022. https://sydneyreviewofbooks.com/essay/rossmanith-ditching-the-new-yorker-voice/
   Google Scholar
• Ruby, Jay. 1980. “Exposing Yourself: Reflexivity, Anthropology, and Film.” Semiotica 30 (1/2): 153–179. doi:10.1515/semi.1980.30.1-2.153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, Donald. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sheikh, Simon. 2009. “Objects of Study or Commodification of Knowledge? Remarks on Artistic Research.” Art and Research: A Journal of Ideas, Context and Methods 2 (2) Available at: http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n2/sheikh.html Accessed
   Google Scholar
• Simms, Marion. 2019. “The Modern Australian University: Surviving the Politics of the Unified National System.” Australian Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 288–300. doi:10.1080/10361146.2019.1588225.
   Google Scholar
• Slager, Henk. 2020. “After the Research Turn.” MaHKUscript: Journal of Fine Art Research 4 (1): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Hazel, and Roger T Dean, eds. 2009. Practice-led Research, Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, Stephanie. 2022. Feltness: Research-Creation, Socially Engaged Art, and Affective Pedagogies. North Carolina: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Springgay, Stephanie, Rita Irwin, Carl Leggo, and Peter Gouzouasis. 2008. Being with a/r/tography. Netherlands: BRILL.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart-Harawira, Makere. 2015. “Re-Singing the World: Indigenous Pedagogies and Global Crisis during Conflicted Times.” In Globalization and ‘Minority’ Cultures, edited by Croisy Sophie, 160–184. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Strand, Dennis. 1998. Research in the Creative Arts. Canberra: Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Graeme. 2005. Art Practice as Research: Inquiry in Visual Arts. Thousand Oaks California: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, Harry. 2020. “The Research Excellence Framework in the United Kingdom: Processes, Consequences, and Incentives to Engage.” Qualitative Inquiry 26 (7): 771–779. doi:10.1177/1077800419878748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, Sarah, E, Erin Manning, Natasha Myers, and Stephanie Springgay. 2020. “The Intimacies of Doing Research-Creation”.N. Loveless. edited by, Knowings and Knots: Methodologies and Ecologies in Research-Creation. University of Alberta Press. Alberta. 221–249.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, Andrew. 2015. “The Ideological Context of Impact.” Political Studies Review.” 2015-11 13 4: 474–484. 10.1111/1478-9302.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Jen. 2012. “The Logic of Practice? Art, the Academy, and Fish Out of Water, TEXT.” Special Issue Beyond practice–led research. Accessed 12 September 2022. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue14/Webb.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Webb, Jen. 2015. Researching Creative Writing. Newmarket: Frontinus.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead, Derek. 2003. “Poiesis and Art-Making: A Way of Letting Be.” Contemporary Aesthetics 1. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.7523862.0001.005
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, Jenny. 2011. “Creative Arts Research: A Long Path to Acceptance.” Australian Universities’ Review 53 (2): 68–76.
   Google Scholar