Hidden Factors in the Assessment of Offenders for Community Service Orders in Tasmania

REFERENCES

• ALRC (1987) Sentencing: Penalties, Discussion Paper No 30, AGPS, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• ALR C (1988) Sentencing, AGPS, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, E (1983) ‘Community Service Orders in Tasmania’ in Community Service Orders in Australia and New Zealand; Report of AIC Seminar Report and Proceedings, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, R and Chan, J (1991) Community Service Orders and Periodic Detention as Sentencing Options, Judicial Commission of NSW, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Dominelli, L (1983) Women in Focus: Community Service Orders and the Female Offender, Warwick University, Warwick.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R (1976a) ‘Community Service by Offenders’, New Law Journal, February 12, pp 169–171.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, R (1976b) ‘Community Service by Offenders—II’, New Law Journal, February 19, pp 193–195.
   Google Scholar
• Hine, J, McWilliams, W and Pease, K (1978) ‘Recommendations, Social Information and Sentencing’, Howard Journal, vol 17.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggarth, E (1983) Strategies and Pressures in the Selection Process for Community Service Orders, Birmingham Polytechnic School of Social Work, Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggarth, E (1991) Selection for Community Service, Avebury, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (1983) ‘Reconvictions of Those Given Community Service Orders’, Home Office Statistical Bulletin 18/83, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, G (1991) Community Service Orders; Views of Organisers in NSW, Judicial Commission of NSW, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Kapardis, A (1985) Sentencing by English Magistrates as a Human Process, Asselia Publishers, Nicosia.
   Google Scholar
• Kapardis, A and Farrington, D (1981) ‘An Experimental Study of Sentencing by Magistrates’, Law and Human Behaviour, vol 5, pp 197–121.
   Google Scholar
• Leiversley, S (1983) Community Service Order Evaluation in Queensland, Department of Welfare Services, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, J G and Rooke, M K (1976) The Work Order Scheme: An Evaluation of Tasmania's Work Order Scheme, The Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, W (1980) ‘Selection Policies for Community Service: Practice and Theory’ in Pease, K and McWilliams, W (eds) Community Service by Order, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams, W (1991) Recommendations and Community Service (Research Bulletin No 1), Sheffield: South Yorkshire Probation and After Care (mimeo) cited in Hoggarth, E, Selection for Co Community Service, Avebury, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Miner, M and Seth, N (1983) Community Service Orders in NSW, NSW Dept Corrective Services, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, N and Tonry, M (1990) Between Prison and Probation, OUP, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Oxley, P (1984) Evaluating Rehabilitation: Community Service Orders in South Australia, Research Report No. 2, Office of Crime Statistics, Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, K (1985) ‘Community Service Orders’ in Tonry, M and Morris, N (eds) Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, Volume 6, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, K (1987) ‘Psychology and Sentencing’ in Pennington, D and Lloyd-Bostock, S The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, K and McWilliams, W (eds) (1980) Community Service by Order, Scottish Academic Press, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, K, Durkin, P, Earnshaw I, Payne, D and Thorpe, J (1974) Community Service Orders: The Suitability of Offenders and Local Administration, Home Office Unit (mimeographed), Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J and Roberts, C (1982) ‘Social Enquiry Reports and Sentencing’, Howard Journal, vol 21, pp 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Rooke, M K (1978) ‘Tasmania's Work Order Scheme; A Reply to Varne’, ANZJ Crim, vol 11, p 81.
   Google Scholar
• Shapland J, (1987) ‘Who Controls Sentencing?’ in Pennington, D and Lloyd-Bostock, S The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity, Centre for Socio Legal Studies, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Thorvaldsen, S (1978) The Effects of Community Service on the Attitudes of Offenders, PhD Thesis, Cambridge University, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Duyn, P (1987) ‘Simple Decision Making’ in Pennington, D and LLoyd-Bostock, S The Psychology of Sentencing: Approaches to Consistency and Disparity, Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Varne, S (1976) ‘Saturday Work, a Real Alternative?’, ANZJ Crim, vol 9, p 95.
   Google Scholar
• Vass, A (1986) ‘Community Service: Areas of Concern and Suggestions for Change’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, vol 25, pp 100–111.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, J (1987) Australian Community Based Corrections 1985-86; Report of the National Census of Community Based Corrections, AIC, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K, Restitution in Criminal Law, Max Planck Institute, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, K (1991) Sentencing in Tasmania, Federation Press, Annandale.
   Google Scholar
• Wax, M L (1977) Effects of Symbolic Restitution and Presence of Victim on Delinquent Shoplifters, PhD Dissertation, Washington State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkie, M (1993) Sentencing Women: Pre-Sentence Reports and Constructions of Female Offenders, Crime Research Centre, University of WA, Nedlands.
   Google Scholar
• Young, W (1979) Community Service Orders, Heinemann, London.
   Google Scholar
• Zdenkowski, G and Chan, J (1986a) ‘Just Alternatives—Part I’, 19 ANZJ Crim 67.
   Google Scholar
• Zdenkowski, G and Chan, J (1986b) ‘Just Alternatives—Part II’, 19 ANZJ Crim 131.
   Google Scholar