Trial by media: politics, policy and public opinion, the case of the ACT heroin trial

REFERENCES

• Bammer, G (1995) Feasibility Research into the Controlled Availability of Opioids Stage 2. Report and Recommendations, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health and Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Bammer, G (1992) Foreword: Feasibility Research into the Controlled Availability of Opioids, to Ann Larson Estimating the Numbers of Heroin Users in the ACT, Working Paper Number 1, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health and Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D & Hogg, R (1996) ‘Law and Order Commonsense’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol 8, no 2, p 175.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J (1995) ‘Systematically Distorted Communication? Criminological Knowledge, Media Representation and Public Policy’ The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol 28, p 23.
   Google Scholar
• Combs, J E & Nimmo, D (1996) The Comedy of Democracy, Praeger, Westport.
   Google Scholar
• Daily Telegraph, The 1 July 1997–20 August 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Dicey, A V (1919) Lectures on the Relation Between Law and Public Opinion in England During the Nineteenth Century, MacMillan, London.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, E (1995) ‘Drug Prohibition and Public Health: It's a Crime’, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, vol 28, p 66.
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, R, Baranek P & Chan, J (1989) Negotiating Control: A Study of News Sources, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, R, Baranek P & Chan, J (1987) Visualizing Deviance: A Study of News Organization, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Ericson, R, Baranek P & Chan, J (1991) Representing Order: Crime, Law and Justice in the News Media, Open University Press, Buckingham.
   Google Scholar
• Gillroy, J M (1994) ‘When Responsive Public Policy Does Not Equal Responsible Government’ in R P Churchill (ed), The Ethics of Liberal Democracy: Morality and Democracy in Theory and Practise, Berg, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Goot, M (1993) ‘Polls as science, pollsas spin’, Australian Quarterly, vol 65, no 4, p 133.
   Google Scholar
• Grabovsky, P & Wilson, P (1989) Journalism and Justice: How Crime is Reported, Pluto, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, W (1995) ‘Variations in Prohibition: Harm Minimisation and Drug Wars in Australia and the United States’ The Australian and New Zealand Journal Of Criminology, vol 28, p 74.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S & Beniger, J R (1994) ‘The changing infrastructure of public opinion’ in Ettema J S & Whitney D C (eds), Audience making: How the Media Create the Audience, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, R & Brown, D (1998) Rethinking Law and Order, Pluto Press, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R & Sprague, J (1995) Citizens and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, (1996) ‘Governance and Criminality: The 1995 New South Wales Election Campaign and Law and Order’) Current Issues in Criminal Justice, vol 8, no 2, p 152.
   Google Scholar
• Linsky, M (1988) ‘The media and public deliberation’, in Reich R (ed) The Power of Public Ideas, Ballinger, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Lippman, W (1922) Public Opinion, MacMillan, New York, (1947 ed).
   Google Scholar
• Makkai, T (1994) ‘Drugs law and public opinion’ Eureka Street, vol 4, no 9, pp 55–57.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, I (1997) ‘The Quality of Government Information, Public Opinion and Adversarial Politics ‘Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration, vol 83, p 76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, I & Kingsbury, D (1996) ‘Inservice of the image’, in Media Realities: The News Media and Power in Australian Society, Longman, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M (1996) ‘Parliament and public opinion: the ACT’ Legislative Studies, vol 10, no 2, p 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Peden, J (1997) (ed) Press, Radio and TV Guide 1997–98, 3rd edition, Media Monitors, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R (1988) (ed) The Power of Public Ideas, Ballinger, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, R (1988) ‘Policy making in a democracy’ in Reich, R (ed) The Power of Public Ideas, Ballinger, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Roschwalb, S A and Stack, R A (1995) (eds) Litigation Public Relations: Courting Public Opinion, Rothman, Littleton.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, N E (1994) ‘Should drugs belegal?’ in Churchill, R P (ed) The Ethics of Liberal Democracy: Morality and Democracy in Theory and Practice, Berg, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sydney Morning Herald, The 23 August 1997, 13 September 1997, 31 October, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffen, R (1994) ‘The media and democracy: Reclaiming an intellectual agenda’ in Schultz, J (ed) Not Just Another Business: Journalists, Citizens and the Media, Pluto, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Windschuttle, K & E (1981) Fixing the News: Critical Perspectives on the Australian Media, Cassell, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A (1996) Imagining Crime: Textual Outlaws and Criminal Conversations, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar