The Late Modern Prison and the Question of Values

REFERENCES

• Austin, C (2003) Personal communication by letter.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H (1983) Outsiders, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-David, S (1992) ‘Staff-to-inmate Relations in a Total Institution: A Model of Five Modes of Association’, International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, vol 36, no 3, pp 209–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P & Luckmann, T (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge, Anchor Books, Garden City, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I (1969) Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I (1990 ed/1959) The Crooked Timber of Humanity, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, I (2002 ed/1969) Liberty, edited by Henry Hardy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Blunkett, D (2003) Civic Renewal: A New Agenda, the CSV Edith Kahn Memorial Lecture, 11 June 2003, Home Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, AE (2003) ‘Some Sociological Reflections on Restorative Justice’ in von Hirsch, A, Roberts, J, Bottoms, AE, Roach, K & Schiff, M (eds) Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?, Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 79–114.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J (1998) ‘Institutionalising Distrust, Enculturating Trust’ in Braithwaite, V & Levi, M (eds) Trust and Governance, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 343–375.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J & Braithwaite, V (2001) ‘Shame, Shame Management and Regulation’ in Ahmed, E, Harris, N, Braithwaite, J & Braithwaite, V (eds) Shame Management through Reintegration, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V (1994) ‘Beyond Rokeach's Equality-Freedom Model: Two-Dimensional Values in a One-Dimensional World’, Journal of Social Issues, vol 50, no 4, pp 67–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V (1998a) ‘The Value Balance of Political Evaluations’, British Journal of Psychology, vol 89, pp 223–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V (1998b) ‘Communal and Exchange Trust Norms: Their Value Base and Relevance to Institutional Trust’ in Braithwaite, V & Levis, M (eds) Trust and Governance, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 46–74.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V & Levi, M (eds) (1998) Trust and Governance, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D & Wilkie, M (eds) (2002) Prisoners As Citizens: Human Rights in Australian Prisons, The Federation Press, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J, Gewirtz, S & McLaughlin, E (2000) New Managerialism, New Welfare?, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Clemmer, D (1940/1958) The Prison Community, Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, N (1981) Limits to Pain, Martin Robertson, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Downes, D & Moragn, R (2002) ‘The skeletons in the cupboard: the politics of law and order at the turn of the millennium’ in Maguire, M, Morgan, R & Reiner, R (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 286–321.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P & Wootton, A (1996; 1st pub. 1988) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• du Gay, P (2000) ‘Entrepreneurial Governance and Public Management: The Anti-Bureaucrats’ in Clarke, J, Gewirtz, S, & McLaughlin, E (2000) (eds) New Managerialism, New Welfare? Sage, London, pp 62–81.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, C (1999) Locating the Energy for Change: An Introduction to Appreciative Inquiry, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg.
   Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A (ed) (1995) New communitarian thinking: persons, virtues, institutions, and communities, Charlottesville, University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Gaita, R (1998) A Common Humanity: Thinking about Love and Truth and Justice, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Gambetta, D (ed) (1988) Trust: Making and Breaking of Cooperative Relations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkle, H (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D (1990) Punishment and Modern Society, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D (1997) ‘“Governmentality” and the Problem of Crime: Foucault, Criminology, Sociology’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 1, no 2, pp 173–214.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D (2001) The Culture of Control, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D & Young, P (1983) The Power to Punish: Contemporary Penalty and Social Analysis, Gower, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Polity Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, MJ (1997) ‘The Illusion of Structure: A Critique of the Classical Model of Organisation and the Discretionary Power of Correctional Officers’, Criminal Justice Review, vol 22, no 1, pp 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, D (1964) The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System, Bobb-Merill, Indianapolis.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E (1967a) ‘Where the Action is’ in Goffman, E Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour, Doubleday Anchor, New York, pp 149–270.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E (1967b) ‘On Face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction’ in Goffman, E Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour, Doubleday Anchor, New York, pp 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, HLA (1961) The Concept of Law, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Heeren, J (1971) ‘Alfred Schutz and Common Sense Knowledge’ in Douglas, J (ed) Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
   Google Scholar
• Hollis, M (1998) Trust Within Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (1991a) Prison Disturbances April 1990: Report of an Inquiry by the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Woolf (Parts I and II) and his Honour Judge Stephen Tumim (Part II), HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (1991b) Custody, Care and Justice: The Way Ahead for the Prison Service in England and Wales, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Home Office (1995) Review of Prison Service Security in England and Wales and the Escape from Parkhurst Prison on Tuesday 3rd January 1995—The Learmont Report, HMSO, London.
   Google Scholar
• Honneth, A (1995) The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy edited by Charles W. Wright, State University of New York Press, Albany.
   Google Scholar
• HMC IP (2003) HM Prison Wandsworth: Report of an Unannounced Inspection of HM Prison Wandsworth 20–24 January 2003, Home Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J (1977) Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Karstedt, S (2001) ‘Die moralische Stärke schwacher Bindungen: Individualismus und Gewalt im Kulturvergleich (The Moral Strength of Weak Ties: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Individualism and Violence)’, Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, vol 84, pp 226–243.
   Google Scholar
• King, R & McDermott, K (1995) The State of our Prisons, Oxford, Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A (2000) ‘Prison officers, policing, and the use of discretion’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 4, no 3, pp 333–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebling, A (2001) ‘Policy and Practice in the Management of Disruptive Prisoners: Incentives and Earned Privileges, the Spurr Report and Close Supervision Centres’ in Clare, E & Bottomley, K Evaluation of Close Supervision Centres, Home Office Research Study 219, London, Home Office, pp 115–164.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A (2002) ‘A “Liberal Regime within a Secure Perimeter”?: Dispersal Prisons and Penal Practice in the Late 20th Century’ in Bottoms, AE & Tonry, M (eds) Ideology, Crime and Criminal Justice: A Symposium in Honour of Sir Leon Radzinowicz, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, pp 97–153.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A (2004) Prisons and their Moral Performance: A Study of Values, Quality and Prison Life, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A, Tait, S, Stiles, A, & Durie, L (forthcoming) ‘Revisiting Prison Suicide: the role of fairness and distress’ in Liebling, A & Maruna, S (Eds.) The Effects of Imprisonment, Willan, Cullompton.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A & Arnold, H (2002) Measuring the Quality of Prison Life: Research Findings 174, Home Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A, Elliott, C & Arnold, H (2001) ‘Transforming the Prison: Romantic Optimism or Appreciative Realism?’, Criminal Justice, vol 1, no 1, pp 161–180.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A & Price, D (1999) An Exploration of Staff-Prisoner Relationships at HMP Whitemoor, Prison Service Research Report No 6.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A & Price, D (2001) The Prison Officer, Prison Service and Waterside Press, Leyhill.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, CH (1992) ‘Well-Kept: Comparing Quality of Confinement in Private and Public Prisons’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, vol 83, no 3, pp 577–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A (1999) Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues, Duckworth, London.
   Google Scholar
• McAra, L (2003) ‘The Acculturation of Punishment: Theory and Method in Comparative Penology’, paper presented at the British Society of Criminology Conference, Bangor, 24–26 June 2003.
   Google Scholar
• McDermott, K & King, R (1988) ‘Mind Games: Where the action is in prison’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 28, no 3, pp 357–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B (1999) Trust Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Moos, RH (1975) Evaluating Correctional and Community Settings, Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, O (2002) A Question of Trust, The BBC Reith Lecture Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C & Bouckaert, G (2000) Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C, Sirre, X, Lonsdale, J, Mul, R, & Summa, H (1999/2001) Performance or Compliance? Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M (2001) The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Prison Service (1992) Model Regime for Local Prisons and Remand Centres, Home Office, Prison Service.
   Google Scholar
• Prison Service (1994) Corporate Plan 1994–97, Prison Service, London.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, D (2001) Concepts of Justice, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J (1980) A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1st pub. 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, G & McNeill, F (2004) ‘Purposes matters: the ends of probation’ in Mair, G (ed), What Matters in Probation Work, Willan, Cullompton.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, P (1995) ‘The Opening Stages of Criminal Justice Policy-Making’, British Journal of Criminology, vol 35, no 1, pp 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, J (2000) The Politics of Hope, Jonathan Cape, London.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A (1962) Collected Papers I: The Problems of Social Reality, edited by Martin Natanson, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A (1964) Collected Papers II: Studies in Social Theory, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, AB (1997) The Problem of Trust, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R (1998) The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism, W.W. Norton, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R (2003) Respect: The Formation of Character in an Age of Inequality, Allen Lane, London.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J (2000) ‘The Society of Captives in the Era of Hyperincarceration’, Theoretical Criminology, vol 4, no 3, pp 285–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J & Feeley, M (1995) ‘The New Penology and Public Discourse on Crime’ in Blomberg, T & Cohen, S (eds) Punishment and Social Control, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A (2002) A Study of How and the Extent to Which, KPIs Drive Performance in the Prison Service, unpublished MSt Thesis, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, R (2003) ‘Durkheim's Near-Death Experience: Rehabilitation and the Sociology of Emotions since the 1980s’, paper presented at the Scottish Criminology Conference, Edinburgh, September 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, R, Bottoms, AE & Hay, W (1996) Prisons and the Problem of Order, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G (1958) The Society of Captives, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G & Messinger, S (1960) The Inmate Social System: Theoretical studies in the Organization of the Prison, Social Science Research Council Pamphlet No 15, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C (1968) ‘Review of History and Truth: Essays by Paul Ricoeur’, Journal of Philosophy, vol 65, no 13, pp 401–3.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C (1985) ‘What Is Human Agency?’ in Human Agency and Language: Philosophical Papers 1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 15–44.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C (1992) Sources of the Self, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tiles, JE (2000) Moral Measures: An Introduction to Ethics West and East, Routledge, London.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, TR & Blader, SL (2000) Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioural Engagement, Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, EM (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Deth, J & Scarbrough, J (eds) (1998) The Impact of Values, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Wachtel, T, & McCold, P (2001) ‘Restorative Justice in Everyday Life’ in Strang, H & Braithwaite, J (eds), Restorative Justice and Civil Society, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 114–29.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte, W (1943) Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Wrong, DH (1994) The Problem of Order: What Divides and Unites Society, The Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Zehr, H (1991) Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Criminal Justice, Herald Press, Scottsdale CA.
   Google Scholar
• Wheatley, P (2003) Address to Prison Service Conference, Harrogate, February.
   Google Scholar