Provocation in Sentencing: A Culpability-Based Framework

References

• Bronitt S & McSherry B 2005 Principles of Criminal Law 2nd ed Lawbook Co
   Google Scholar
• Coss G 2007 ‘The Defence of Provocation: An Acrimonious Divorce from Reality’ Current Issues in Criminal Justice vol 18 no 1 pp 51
   Google Scholar
• Coss G 2006 ‘Provocative Reform: A Comparative Critique’ Criminal Law Journal vol 30 pp 138
   Google Scholar
• Coss G 1991 ‘“God is a righteous judge strong and patient: and God is provoked every day” A Brief History of Provocation in England’ 13 Sydney Law Review vol 13 pp 570
   Google Scholar
• Department of Justice and Attorney-General Queensland 2007 Discussion Paper: Audit on Defences to Homicide: Accident and Provocation
   Google Scholar
• Horder J 2004 Excusing Crime Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• The Law Reform Commission Ireland 2003 Consultation Paper on Homicide: The Plea of Provocation LRC CP 27–2003
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission [UK] 2004 Partial Defences to Murder Final Report
   Google Scholar
• Law Commission [UK] 2006 Murder Manslaughter and Infanticide Law Com No 304
   Google Scholar
• Law Reform Commission of Western Australia 2007 Review of the Law of Homicide: Final Report Project 97
   Google Scholar
• Leader-Elliott I 1997 ‘Passion and Insurrection in the Law of Sexual Provocation’ in Ngaire N & Owens R ed Sexing the Subject of Law LBC Information Services
   Google Scholar
• Maitland FW 1909 The Forms of Action at Common Law
   Google Scholar
• McSherry B 2005 ‘It's a Man's World: Claims of Provocation and Automatism in “Intimate” Homicides’ Melbourne University Law Review vol 29 pp 905
   Google Scholar
• Model Criminal Code Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General 1998 Model Criminal Code Chapter 5: Fatal Offences Against the Person Discussion Paper
   Google Scholar
• Morgan J 1997 ‘Provocation Law and Facts: Dead Women Tell No Tales, Tales are Told about Them’ Melbourne University Law Review vol 21 pp 237
   Google Scholar
• Morgan J 2002 Who Kills Whom and Why: Looking Beyond Legal Categories Victorian Law Reform Commission
   Google Scholar
• Nash G 1996 Bourke's Criminal Law Victoria
   Google Scholar
• Neave M 2005 ‘Homicide Sentences: Taking Culpability into Account’ Reform vol 85 pp 33
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Law Commission 2007 The Partial Defence of Provocation Report 98
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Advisory Panel [UK] 2005 Manslaughter by Reason of Provocation: The Panel's Advice to the Sentencing Guidelines Council
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Guidelines Council [UK] 2005 Manslaughter by Reason of Provocation: Guideline
   Google Scholar
• Sentencing Task Force Victoria 1989 Review of Statutory Maximum Penalties in Victoria: Report to the Attorney-General written for the Task Force by Richard Fox and Arie Freiberg
   Google Scholar
• Stewart F & Freiberg A 2008 Provocation in Sentencing Sentencing Advisory Council
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan GR 1993 ‘Anger and Excuse: Reassessing Provocation’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies vol 13 pp 421
   Google Scholar
• Tadros V 2001 ‘The Characters of Excuse’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies vol 21 no 3 pp 495
   Google Scholar
• Tomsen S 2002 Hatred Murder and Male Honour: Anti-Homosexual Homicides in New South Wales 1980–2000 Public Policy Series No 43 Australian Institute of Criminology
   Google Scholar
• Tomsen S & Allen G 1997 ‘The Criminal Justice Response to Gay Killings: Research Findings’ Current Issues in Criminal Justice vol 9 pp 56
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission 2003 Defences to Homicide: Options Paper
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission 2004 Defences to Homicide: Final Report
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Law Reform Commission 2006 Review of Family Violence Laws: Report
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch A 1983 ‘Commensurability and Crime Prevention: Evaluating Formal Sentencing Structures and Their Rationale’ Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology vol 74 no 1 pp 209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hirsch A 1993 Censure and Sanctions Clarendon Press Oxford
   Google Scholar
• Wells C 2000 ‘Provocation: The Case for Abolition’ in Ashworth A & Mitchell B eds Rethinking English Homicide Law Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar