Public Attitudes towards Penalties for Sexting by Minors

References

• Albury K and Crawford K (2012) ‘Sexting, Consent and Young People's Ethics: Beyond Megan's Story’, Continuum 26, 463–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Associated Press-MTV (2009) MTV-AP Digital Abuse Study <http://www.athinline.org/MTV-AP_Digital_Abuse_Study_Executive_Summary.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Braun V and Clarke V (2006) ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Clark R (2014) ‘Government to Reform Laws Relating to “Sexting”’ (August 2014) <http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/images/stories/documents/mediareleases/2014/August/140821_Clark_-_Government_to_reform_laws_relating_to_sexting002.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences (2nd ed), Erlbaum
   Google Scholar
• Comartin E, Kernsmith R and Kernsmith P (2013) ‘“Sexting” and Sex Offender Registration: Do Age, Gender, and Sexual Orientation Matter?’, Deviant Behavior 34, 38–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan P, Markowitz FE, Watson A, Rowan D and Kubiak MA (2003) ‘An Attribution Model of Public Discrimination Towards Persons with Mental Illness’, Journal of Health and Social Behavior 44, 162–79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crofts T and Lee M (2013) “Sexting’, Children and Child Pornography’, Sydney Law Review 35, 85–106
   Google Scholar
• Devilly G and Le Grand J (2014) ‘Sentencing of Sex-Offenders: A Survey Study Investigating Judges' Sentences and Community Perspectives’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, DOI:10.1080/13218719.2014.931324
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Messer D, Bauermeister JA, Grodzinski A and Zimmerman M (2013) ‘Sexting among Young Adults’, Journal of Adolescent Health 52, 301–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison K (2013) ‘An International Comparison of Sentencing Policy and Legislation’ in Harrison K and Rainey B (eds), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Legal and Ethical Aspects of Sex Offender Treatment and Management, John Wiley & Sons
   Google Scholar
• Joint Select Committee on Cyber-Safety (2011) High-Wire Act: Cyber-Safety and the Young, Commonwealth of Australia
   Google Scholar
• Karaian L (2013) ‘Policing ‘Sexting’: Responsibilization, Respectability and Sexual Subjectivity in Child Protection/Crime Prevention Responses to Teenagers' Digital Sexual Expression’, Theoretical Criminology 18(3), 282–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klettke B, Hallford DJ and Meloor DJ (2014) ‘Sexting Prevalence and Correlates: A Systematic Literature Review’, Clinical Psychology Review 34, 44–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner A (2013) ‘The Need for Sexting Law Reform: Appropriate Punishment for Teenage Behaviors’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 16, 281–303
   Google Scholar
• Lambert AJ and Raichle K (2000) ‘The Role of Political Ideology in Mediating Judgments of Blame in Rape Victims and Their Assailants: A Test of the Just World, Personal Responsibility, and Legitimization Hypotheses’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 853–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Crofts T, Salter M, Milivojevic S and McGovern, A (2013) ‘“Let's Get Sexting”: Risk, Power, Sex and Criminalisation in the Moral Domain’, International Journal for Crime and Justice 2(1), 35–49
   Google Scholar
• Lenhart A (2009) Teens and Sexting: How and Why Minor Teens are Sending Sexually Suggestive Nude or Nearly Nude Images via Text Messaging, Pew Research Centre, <http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media/Files/Reports/2009/PIP_Teens_and_Sexting.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury K, Mitchell KJ and Finkelhor D (2011) The True Prevalence of ‘Sexting’, Crimes against Children Research Centre, University of New Hampshire, <http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/Sexting%20Fact%20Sheet%204_29_11.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Mackenzie G, Spiranovic C, Warner K, Stobbs N, Gelb K, Indermaur D, Roberts L, Broadhurst R and Bouhours T (2012) ‘Sentencing and Public Confidence: Results from a National Australian Survey on Public Opinions Towards Sentencing’, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 45, 45–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Jones LM and Wolak J (2012) ‘Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study’, Pediatrics 129, 13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell A and Henry N (2014) ‘Blurred Lines? Responding to “Sexting” and Gender-based Violence among Young People’, Children Australia 38, 119–24
   Google Scholar
• Ringrose J, Gill R, Livingstone S and Harvey L (2012) A Qualitative Study of Children, Young People and ‘Sexting’. A Report Prepared for the NSPCC <http://www.nspcc.org.uk/globalassets/documents/research-reports/qualitative-study-children-young-people-sexting-report.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Roberts LD and Indermaur D (2007) ‘Predicting Punitive Attitudes in Australia’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 14, 56–65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter M, Crofts T and Lee M (2013) ‘Beyond Criminalization and Responsibilisation: Sexting, Gender and Young People’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 24, 301–16
   Google Scholar
• Shackley M, Weiner C, Day A and Willis GM (2014) ‘Assessment of Public Attitudes Towards Sex Offenders in an Australian Population’, Psychology, Crime & Law 20, 553–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer W (2011) ‘Investigation of Child Porn “Sexting” Case among Lee High Students Underway’, Kingston Patch (31 May 2011) Spiranovic CA, Roberts LD and Indermaur D (2012) ‘What Predicts Punitiveness? An Examination of Predictors of Punitive Attitudes Towards Offenders in Australia’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 19, 249–61
   Google Scholar
• Strassberg DS, McKinnon RK, Sustaita MA and Rullo J (2013) ‘Sexting by High School Students: An Exploratory and Descriptive Study’, Archives of Sexual Behavior 42, 15–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strohmair H, Murphy M and DeMatteo D (2014) ‘Youth Sexting: Prevalence Rates, Driving Motivations, and the Deterrent Effect of Legal Consequences’, Sexuality Research and Social Policy 11, 245–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon K, Choi A, Keeley M, Elliott J and Maher D (2012) New Voices/New laws: School-age Young People in New South Wales Speak Out about the Criminal Laws that Apply to their Online Behaviour, National Children's and Youth Law Centre and Legal Aid NSW <http://www.lawstuff.org.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/15030/New-Voices-Law-Reform-Report.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Parliamentary Law Reform Committee (‘VPLRC’) (2013) Inquiry into Sexting: Report of the Law Reform Committee Inquiry into Sexting, Parl Paper No 230 (2010–2013)
   Google Scholar
• Walker S, Sanci L and Temple-Smith M (2013a) ‘Sexting: Young Women's and Men's Views on its Nature and Origins’, Journal of Adolescent Health 52, 697–701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker S, Sanci L and Temple-Smith M (2013b) ‘Sexting and Young People: Experts' Views’, Youth Studies Australia 30, 8–16
   Google Scholar
• Warner K and Davis J (2012) ‘Using Jurors to Explore Public Attitudes to Sentencing’, British Journal of Criminology 52, 93–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis GM, Malinen S and Johnston L (2013) ‘Demographic Differences in Public Attitudes towards Sex Offenders’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 20, 230–47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolak J, Finkelhor D and Mitchell KJ (2012) ‘How Often are Teens Arrested for Sexting? Data from a National Sample of Police Cases’, Pediatrics 129, 4–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood J (2008) ‘Why Public Opinion of the Criminal Justice System is Important’ in Grannon T (ed), Public Opinion and Criminal Justice, William Publishing, 33–46
   Google Scholar