The ‘Focal Concerns’ of Parole Board Decision-Making: A Thematic Analysis

References

• ABC News (2013) ‘Victoria's Adult Parole Board Had “Less than 8 Minutes” to Deal With Each Case: Anonymous Former Board Member’, 26 July 2013, <http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-07-25/adult-parole-board-had-only-minutes-to-deal-with-each-case/4843450>
   Google Scholar
• Attride-Stirling J (2001) ‘Thematic Networks: An Analytic Tool for Qualitative Research’, Qualitative Research 1(3), 385–405
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) 4517.0 Prisoners in Australia, 2013 <http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/Lookup/4517.0main+features42013>
   Google Scholar
• Bartels L (2013) ‘Parole and Parole Authorities in Australia: A System in Crisis?’, Criminal Law Journal 37(6), 357–76
   Google Scholar
• Bench LL and Allen TD (2013) ‘Assessing Sex Offender Recidivism Using Multiple Measures: A Longitudinal Analysis’, The Prison Journal 93(4), 411–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond C and Jeffries S (2009) ‘An Examination of the Sentencing Remarks of Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Criminal Defendants in South Australia's Higher Courts’, Proceeding of the Annual Conference of the Australian Sociological Association, Australian National University, 1–13
   Google Scholar
• Bond C and Jeffries S (2011a) ‘Harsher Sentences? Indigeneity and Prison Sentence Length in Western Australia's Higher Courts’, Journal of Sociology 48(3), 266–86
   Google Scholar
• Bond C and Jeffries S (2011b) ‘Measuring Risk and Blameworthiness in the Sentencing of Criminal Defendants: An Exploratory Study in Western Australia's Higher Courts’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 23(1), 17–35
   Google Scholar
• Bond C and Jeffries S (2012) ‘Indigeneity and the Likelihood of Imprisonment in Queensland's Adult and Children's Courts’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 19(2), 169–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond C, Jeffries S and Weatherburn D (2011) ‘How Much Time? Indigenous Status and the Sentenced Imprisonment Term Decision in New South Wales’, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44(2), 272–90
   Google Scholar
• Braun V and Clarke V (2006) ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Callinan I (2013) Review of the Parole System in Victoria, Justice and Regulation, Victoria State Government <http://www.corrections.vic.gov.au/utility/publications+manuals+and+statistics/review+of+the+parole+system+in+victoria>
   Google Scholar
• Caplan JM (2007) ‘What Factors Affect Parole — A Review of Empirical Research’, Federal Probation 71(1), 16–19
   Google Scholar
• Caplan JM (2010) ‘Parole Release Decisions: Impact of Victim Input on a Representative Sample of Inmates’, Journal of Criminal Justice 38(3), 291–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll JS (1978) ‘Causal Attributions in Expert Parole Decisions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36(12), 1501–11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll JS, Wiener RL, Coates D, Galegher J and Alibrio JJ (1982) ‘Evaluation, Diagnosis, and Prediction in Parole Decision Making’, Law and Society Review 17(1), 199–228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clear TR and Gallagher KW (1985) ‘Probation and Parole Supervision: A Review of Current Classification Practices’, Crime & Delinquency 31(3), 423–43
   Google Scholar
• Dixon J (1995) ‘The Organizational Context of Criminal Sentencing’, American Journal of Sociology, 1157–98
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein J, Flemming RB and Nardulli PF (1988) The Contours of Justice: Communities and Their Courts, Little, Brown
   Google Scholar
• Eisenstein J and Jacob H (1977) Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts, Little, Brown
   Google Scholar
• Erez E (1992) ‘Dangerous Men, Evil Women: Gender and Parole Decision-Making’, Justice Quarterly 9(1), 105–26
   Google Scholar
• Feeley MM and Simon J (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications’, Criminology 30(4), 449–74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland D (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Glaser D (1985) ‘Who Gets Probation and Parole: Case Study Versus Actuarial Decision Making’, Crime & Delinquency 31(3), 367–78
   Google Scholar
• Gobeil R and Serin RC (2009) ‘Preliminary Evidence of Adaptive Decision Making Techniques Used by Parole Board Members’, International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 8(2), 97–104
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM and Namey EE (2012) Applied Thematic Analysis, Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2004) ‘Losing Ground: Gendered Knowledges, Parole Risk, and Responsibility’, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society 11(3), 363–85
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K (2006) ‘Pandora's Box: Risk/Need and Gender-Responsive Corrections’, Criminology and Public Policy 5(1), 183–92
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K and Shaw M (2001) Taking Risks: Incorporating Gender and Culture into the Classification and Assessment of Federally Sentenced Women in Canada, Status of Women Canada
   Google Scholar
• Hannah-Moffat K and Yule C (2011) ‘Gaining Insight, Changing Attitudes and Managing “Risk”: Parole Release Decisions for Women Convicted of Violent Crimes’, Punishment & Society 13(2), 149–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding J (2006) ‘Some Reflections on Risk Assessment, Parole and Recall’, Journal of Community and Criminal Justice 53(4), 389–96
   Google Scholar
• Harris A (2009) ‘Attributions and Institutional Processing: How Focal Concerns Guide Decision-Making in the Juvenile Court’, Race and Social Problems 1(4), 243–56
   Google Scholar
• Hartley RD, Maddan S and Spohn CC (2007) ‘Concerning Conceptualization and Operationalization: Sentencing Data and the Focal Concerns Perspective — A Research Note’, Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice 4(1), 58–78
   Google Scholar
• Hinds L (2005) ‘Three Strikes and You're Out in the West: A Study of Newspaper Coverage of Crime Control in Western Australia’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 17(2), 239–353
   Google Scholar
• Holtfreter K (2013) ‘Gender and “Other People's Money”: An Analysis of White-Collar Offender Sentencing’, Women & Criminal Justice 23(4), 326–44
   Google Scholar
• Huebner BM and Bynum TS (2006) ‘An Analysis of Parole Decision Making Using a Sample of Sex Offenders: A Focal Concerns Perspective’, Criminology 44(4), 961–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffries S and Bond CE (2010) ‘Narratives of Mitigation: Sentencing Indigenous Criminal Defendants in South Australia's Higher Courts’, Journal of Sociology 46(3), 219–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruttschnitt C (2010) ‘The Paradox of Women's Imprisonment’, Daedalus 139(3), 32–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlychek MC and Johnson BD (2004) ‘The Juvenile Penalty: A Comparison of Juvenile and Young Adult Sentencing Outcomes in Criminal Court’, Criminology 42(2), 485–515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey N (2012) ‘Punishment, (Neo)Liberalism and Social Democracy’, Max Weber Programme, European University Institute <http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/21134/MWP_LS_Lacey_2012_02.pdf?sequence=1>
   Google Scholar
• Langan PA and Levin DJ (2002) ‘Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 1994’, Federal Sentencing Reporter 15(1), 58–65
   Google Scholar
• Leiber M, Reitzel J and Mack K (2011) ‘Probation Officer Recommendations for Sentencing Relative to Judicial Practice: The Implications for African Americans’, Criminal Justice Policy Review 22(3), 301–29
   Google Scholar
• Lin J, Grattet R and Petersilia J (2010) ‘“Back-End Sentencing” and Reimprisonment: Individual, Organizational, and Community Predictors of Parole Sanctioning Decisions’, Criminology 48(3), 759–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey SC and Miller MK (2011) ‘Discretionary Release Decisions of Actual and Mock Parole Board Members: Implications for Community Sentiment and Parole Decision-Making Research’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 18(4), 498–516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney JL and Daffern M (2014) ‘Elucidating the Factors that Influence Parole Decision-Making and Violent Offenders' Performance on Parole’, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 21(3), 385–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan KD and Smith BL (2005a) ‘Parole Release Decisions Revisited: An Analysis of Parole Release Decisions for Violent Inmates in a Southeastern State’, Journal of Criminal Justice 33(3), 277–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan KD and Smith BL (2005b) ‘Victims, Punishment, and Parole: The Effect of Victim Participation on Parole Hearings’, Criminology & Public Policy 4(2), 333–60
   Google Scholar
• Naylor B and Schmidt J (2010) ‘Do Prisoners Have a Right to Fairness before the Parole Board?’, Sydney Law Review 32(3), 437–69
   Google Scholar
• New South Wales Law Reform Commission (2013) Parole Question Paper 3: Discretionary Parole Decision Making <http://www.lawreform.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/current-project/parole/question-paper/qp%203%20-%20discretionary%20parole%20decision%20making_final.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ and Collins KM (2007) ‘A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research’, The Qualitative Report 12(2), 281–316
   Google Scholar
• Padfield N and Maruna S (2006) ‘The Revolving Door at the Prison Gate: Exploring the Dramatic Increase in Recalls to Prison’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 6(3), 329–52
   Google Scholar
• Petersilia J (2003) When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Prisoners Review Board of Western Australia (2007) Prisoners Review Board Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2007 <http://www.prisonersreviewboard.wa.gov.au/_files/PRB_Annual_Report_2007.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Prisoners Review Board of Western Australia (2008) Prisoners Review Board Annual Report for the Year Ended 30 June 2008 <http://www.prisonersreviewboard.wa.gov.au/_files/PRB_Annual_Report_2008.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Prisoners Review Board of Western Australia (2013) Prisoners Review Board Annual Report 2012/13 <http://www.prisonersreviewboard.wa.gov.au/_files/PRB_Annual_report_2013.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Prisoners Review Board of Western Australia (2015) Prisoners Review Board Decisions <http://www.prisonersreviewboard.wa.gov.au/D/decisions.aspx?uid=4250-2542-6323-4438>
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JV, Stalans LJ, Indermaur D and Hough M (2002) Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez SF, Curry TR and Lee G (2006) ‘Gender Differences in Criminal Sentencing: Do Effects Vary Across Violent, Property, and Drug Offenses?’, Social Science Quarterly 87(2), 318–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon J (1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990, University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Simon J (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Soothill K (2010) ‘Sex Offender Recidivism’, Crime and Justice 39(1), 145–211
   Google Scholar
• Spohn C and Beichner D (2000) ‘Is Preferential Treatment of Female Offenders a Thing of the Past? A Multisite Study of Gender, Race, and Imprisonment’, Criminal Justice Policy Review 11(2), 149–84
   Google Scholar
• Spohn C and Holleran D (2000) ‘The Imprisonment Penalty Paid by Young, Unemployed Black and Hispanic Male Offenders’, Criminology 38(1), 281–306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D (1980) ‘Assessing the Impact of the Women's Movement on Sex-Based Differences in the Handling of Adult Criminal Defendants’, Crime & Delinquency 26(3), 344–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D and Demuth S (2000) ‘Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in US Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly?’, American Sociological Review, 65(5), 705–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D and Demuth S (2001) ‘Ethnicity and Judge's Sentencing Decisions: Hispanic-Black-White Comparisons’, Criminology 39(1), 145–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D and Demuth S (2006) ‘Does Gender Modify the Effects of Race-Ethnicity on Criminal Sanctioning? Sentences for Male and Female White, Black, and Hispanic Defendants’, Journal of Quantitative Criminology 22(3), 241–61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D, Kramer J and Streifel C (1993) ‘Gender and Imprisonment Decisions’, Criminology 31(3), 411–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensmeier D, Ulmer J and Kramer J (1998) ‘The Interaction of Race, Gender and Age in Criminal Sentencing: The Punishment Cost of Being Young, Black and Male’, Criminology 36(4), 763–97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer JT (1997) Social Worlds of Sentencing: Court Communities under Sentencing Guidelines, SUNY Press
   Google Scholar
• Ulmer JT and Johnson B (2004) ‘Sentencing in Context: A Multilevel Analysis’, Criminology 42(1), 137–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmer JT, Kurlychek MC and Kramer JH (2007) ‘Prosecutorial Discretion and the Imposition of Mandatory Minimum Sentences’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 44(4), 427–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viellaris R and Ironside R (2013) ‘Court-Ordered Parole, Suspended Sentences may be Dumped as State Gets Tough on Crime’, The Courier Mail (online), 31 July 2013 <http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/courtordered-parole-suspended-sentences-may-be-dumped-as-state-gets-tough-on-criminals/story-fnihsrf2-1226688347819>
   Google Scholar
• Weinrath M (2007) ‘Sentencing Disparity: Aboriginal Canadians, Drunk Driving and Age’, Western Criminology Review 8(2) 16–28
   Google Scholar