Restorative Justice Conferencing as a ‘Holistic’ Process: Convenor Perspectives

References

• Abrams LS, Umbreit M and Gordon A (2006) ‘Young Offenders Speak about Meeting Their Victims: Implications for Future Programs’, Contemporary Justice Review 9(3), 243–56
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong J (2012) ‘Factors Contributing to Victims' Satisfaction with Restorative Justice Practice: A Qualitative Examination’, British Journal of Community Justice 10(2), 39–54
   Google Scholar
• Artinopoulou V and Michael I (2014) ‘Empowering Restorative Justice in Greece: One Step Forward for Victims’ in T Gavrielides (ed), A Victim-Led Criminal Justice System: Addressing the Paradox, IARS Publications, 143–64
   Google Scholar
• Barton CKB (2003) Restorative Justice: The Empowerment Model, Hawkins Press
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore G and Elis L (2007) ‘Evaluation of Restorative Justice’ in G Johnstone and DW Van Ness (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice, Willan Publishing, 397–425
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore G, Elis L and Green DL (2007) ‘The “Independent Variable” in Restorative Justice: Theory-Based Standards for Evaluating the Impact and Integrity of Victim Sensitive Process (Part Ii)’, Victims & Offenders 2(4), 351–73
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore G and Green DL (2007) ‘“Yardsticks” for Victim Sensitive Process: Principle-Based Standards for Gauging the Integrity of Restorative Justice Process’, Victims & Offenders 2(3), 289–301
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore G and O'Brien S (2002) ‘The Quest for a Restorative Model of Rehabilitation: Theory-for-Practice and Practice-for-Theory’ in L Walgrave (ed) Restorative Justice and the Law, Willan Publishing, 31–67
   Google Scholar
• Bazemore G and Schiff M (2005) Juvenile Justice Reform and Restorative Justice: Building Theory and Policy from Practice, Willan Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Bolitho J (2015) ‘Putting Justice Needs First: A Case Study of Best Practice in Restorative Justice’, Restorative Justice 3(2), 256–81
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyack J, Bowen H and Marshall C (2004) ‘How Does Restorative Justice Ensure Good Practice?’ in H Zehr and B Toews (eds), Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, Criminal Justice Press, 265–76
   Google Scholar
• Braun V and Clarke V (2006) ‘Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2), 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Bruce J (2013) ‘Understanding “Back Stage” and “Front Stage” Work in Restorative Justice Conferences: The Benefits of Using Ethnographic Techniques’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 25(1), 517–26
   Google Scholar
• Campbell C, Devlin R, O'Mahony D, Doak J, Jackson J, Corrigan T and McEvoy K (2006) Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth Conference Service, Northern Ireland Office
   Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Bazemore G and Gilbert MJ (2012) ‘Review of Research on Victims' Experiences in Restorative Justice: Implications for Youth Justice’, Children and Youth Services Review 34(1), 35–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JJ and Gilbert M J (2010) ‘“Joe Everyday, People Off the Street”: A Qualitative Study on Mediators' Roles and Skills in Victim-Offender Mediation’, Contemporary Justice Review 13(2), 207–27
   Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Green DL and Gilbert MJ (2011) ‘Putting a Human Face on Crimes: A Qualitative Study on Restorative Justice Processes for Youths’, Child and Adolescent Social Work 28(5), 335–55
   Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Green DL and Kapp SA (2010) ‘Victimization, Victims' Needs, and Empowerment in Victim Offender Mediation’, International Review of Victimology 17(3), 267–90
   Google Scholar
• Coates RB and Gehm J (1989) ‘An Empirical Assessment’ in M Wright and B Galaway (eds), Mediation and Criminal Justice: Victims, Offenders and Community, SAGE Publications, 251–63
   Google Scholar
• Cunneen C and Hoyle C (2010) Debating Restorative Justice, Hart Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Daly K (2002) ‘Restorative Justice: The Real Story’, Punishment & Society 4(1), 55–79
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services (‘DHHS’) (2015) Youth Justice Group Conferencing: Factsheet
   Google Scholar
• Dignan J, Atkinson A, Atkinson H, Howes M, Johnstone J, Robinson G, Shapland J and Sorsby A (2007) ‘Staging Restorative Justice Encounters against a Criminal Justice Backdrop: A Dramaturgical Analysis’, Criminology and Criminal Justice 7(1), 5–32
   Google Scholar
• Gavrielides T (2007) Restorative Justice Theory and Practice: Addressing the Discrepancy, HEUNI Publications
   Google Scholar
• Gerkin P M (2008) ‘Participation in Victim-Offender Mediation: Lessons Learned from Observations’, Criminal Justice Review 34(2), 226–47
   Google Scholar
• Hart D and Pirc G (2012) ‘Forum Sentencing: Using Research and Experience to Improve Practice’ in J Bolitho, J Bruce and G Mason (eds), Restorative Justice: Adults and Emerging Practice, The Federation Press, 57–79
   Google Scholar
• Hayes H (2006) ‘Apologies and Accounts in Youth Justice Conferencing: Reinterpreting Research Outcomes’, Contemporary Justice Review 9(4), 369–85
   Google Scholar
• Hayes H (2007) ‘Reoffending and Restorative Justice’ in G Johnstone and DW Van Ness (eds) Handbook of Restorative Justice, Willan Publishing, 426–44
   Google Scholar
• Hayes H and Daly K (2003) ‘Youth Justice Conferencing and Reoffending’, Justice Quarterly 20(4), 725–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes H and Daly K (2004) ‘Conferencing and Re-Offending in Queensland’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 37(2), 167–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes H, McGee TR and Cerruto M (2011) ‘Explaining Continuity and Change in Offending Behaviour after a Restorative Justice Conference’, Current Issues in Criminal Justice 23(2), 127–43
   Google Scholar
• Hayes H, McGee TR, Punter H and Cerruto M (2013) ‘Agreements in Restorative Justice Conferences: Exploring the Implications of Agreements for Post-Conference Offending Behaviour’, British Journal of Criminology 54(1), 109–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman S (2004) ‘Is Restorative Justice Possible without a Parallel System for Victims?’ in H Zehr and B Toews (eds) Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, Criminal Justice Press, 75–84
   Google Scholar
• Hipple NK, Gruenewald J and McGarrell EF (2014) ‘Restorativeness, Procedural Justice, and Defiance as Predictors of Reoffending of Participants in Family Group Conferences’, Crime & Delinquencey 60(8), 1131–57
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipple NK, Gruenewald J and McGarrell EF (2015) ‘Restorativeness, Procedural Justice, and Defiance as Long-Term Predictors of Reoffending of Participants in Family Group Conferences’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 42(11), 1110–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hokwerda YM and Weijers I (2005) ‘Victim-Offender Mediation and Conferencing with Juvenile Offenders in the Netherlands’ in A Mestitz and S Ghetti (eds), Victim-Offender Mediation with Youth Offenders in Europe: An Overview and Comparison of 15 Countries, Springer, 275–98
   Google Scholar
• Hoyle C, Young R and Hill R (2002) Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Vally Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning, Joseph Rowntree Foundation
   Google Scholar
• KPM G (2010) Review of the Youth Justice Group Conferencing Program Final Report, Department of Human Services, Victoria
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S (2007) Doing Interviews, Sage Publications
   Google Scholar
• Larsen JJ (2014) Restorative Justice in the Australian Criminal Justice System, Australian Institute of Criminology
   Google Scholar
• Lofton BP (2004) ‘Does Restorative Justice Challenge Systemic Injustices?’ in H Zehr and B Toews (eds) Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, Criminal Justice Press, 381–90
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell G, Kingi V, Robertson J, Morris A, Cunningham C and Lash B (2004) Achieving Effective Outcomes in Youth Justice Final Report, New Zealand Ministry of Social Development
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell G and Morris A (1993) Family, Victims and Culture: Youth Justice in New Zealand, WInstitute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell G and Morris A (2001) ‘Family Group Conferences and Reoffending’ in A Morris and G Maxwell (eds) Restorative Justice for Juveniles: Conferencing, Mediation and Circle, Hart Publishing, 243–63
   Google Scholar
• Miller SL (2011) After the Crime: The Power of Restorative Justice Dialogues between Victims and Violent Offenders, New York University Press
   Google Scholar
• Miller SL and Hefner MK (2015) ‘Procedural Justice for Victims and Offenders?: Exploring Restorative Justice Processes in Australia and the US’, Justice Quarterly 32(1), 142–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris A and Maxwell G (1998) ‘Restorative Justice in New Zealand: Family Group Conferences as a Case Study’, Western Criminology Review 1(1), <http://www.westerncriminology.org/documents/WCR/v01n1/Morris/Morris.html>
   Google Scholar
• Morris A, Maxwell GM and Robertson JP (1993) ‘Giving Victims a Voice: A New Zealand Experiment’, Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 32(4), 304–21
   Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission (2016) Report on Government Services 2016: Volume F: Community Services, Commonwealth of Australia
   Google Scholar
• Roche D (2003) Accountability in Restorative Justic, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rossner M (2008) ‘Healing Victims and Offenders and Reducing Crime: A Critical Assessment of Restorative Justice Practice and Theory’, Sociology Compass 2(6), 1734–49
   Google Scholar
• Rossner M (2011) ‘Emotions and Interaction Ritual: A Micro Analysis of Restorative Justice’, British Journal of Criminology 51(1), 95–119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossner M (2012) ‘Emotion across the Lifecourse: The Case for Restorative Justice with Adults’ in J Bolitho, J Bruce and G Mason (eds), Restorative Justice: Adults and Emerging Practic, The Federation Press, 214–30
   Google Scholar
• Rossner M (2013) Just Emotions: Rituals of Restorative Justice, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rossner M, Bruce J and Meher M (2013) The Process and Dynamics of Restorative Justice: Research on Forum Sentencing, University of Western Sydney
   Google Scholar
• Shapland J, Robinson G and Sorsby A (2011) Restorative Justice in Practice: Evaluating What Works for Victims and Offenders, Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Shearar A and Maxwell G (2012) ‘Revolution, Decline, and Renewal: Restorative Youth Justice in New Zealand’ in E Zinsstag and I Vangraechem (eds), Conferencing and Restorative Justice: International Practices and Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 101–16
   Google Scholar
• Strang H, Sherman LW, Mayo-Wilson E, Woods D and Ariel B (2013) Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face-to-Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review, The Campbell Collaboration
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki M and Hayes H (2016) ‘Current Debates over Restorative Justice: Concept, Definition and Practice’, Prison Service Journal 228, 4–8
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki M and Wood WR (2017) ‘Co-Option, Coercion and Compromise: Challenges of Restorative Justice in Victoria, Australia’, Contemporary Justice Review ahead of print doi:10.1080/10282580.2017.1311194
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn M (2005) ‘The Impossible Dreams and Modest Reality of Restorative Justice’, Queen's Law Journal 30(2), 863–938
   Google Scholar
• Toews B and Katounas J (2004) ‘Have Offenders Needs and Perspectives Been Adequately Incorporated into Restorative Justice?’ in H Zehr and B Toews (eds), Critical Issues in Restorative Justice, Criminal Justice Press, 107–18
   Google Scholar
• Tyler TR (1990) Why People Obey the Law, Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit MS (1995) Mediating Interpersonal Conflicts: A Pathway to Peace, CPI Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit MS (1997) ‘Humanistic Mediation: A Transformative Journey of Peacemaking’, Mediation Quarterly 14(3), 201–13
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit MS (1999) ‘Avoiding the Marginalization and “McDonaldization” of Victim-Offender Mediation: A Case Study in Moving toward the Mainstream’ in G Bazemore and L Walgrave (eds), Restorative Juvenile Justice: Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime, Criminal Justice Press, 213–34
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit MS, Coates B and Vos B (2002) ‘The Impact of Restorative Justice Conferencing: A Multi-National Perspective’, British Journal of Community Justice 1(2), 21–48
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit MS, Coates RB and Vos B (2007) ‘Restorative Justice Dialogue: A Multi-Dimensional, Evidence- Based Practice Theory’, Contemporary Justice Review 10(1), 23–41
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit MS, Coates RB and Vos B (2008) ‘The Practice of Victim Offender Mediation: A Look at the Evidence’ in SG Shoham, O Beck and M Kett (eds), International Handbook of Penology an Criminal Justice, CRC Press, 691–708
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp T (2014) Victims of Violence and Restorative Practices: Finding a Voice, Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Van Camp T and Wemmers J-A (2013) ‘Victim Satisfaction with Restorative Justice: More than Simply Procedural Justice’, International Review of Victimology 19(2), 117–43
   Google Scholar
• Van Ness DW (1989) ‘Pursuing a Restorative Vision of Justice’ in P Arthur (ed), Justice: The Restorative Vision. New Perspectives on Crime and Justice, Mennonite Central Committee, 17–30
   Google Scholar
• Vanfraechem I (2015) ‘Victims and Conferencing’ in I Vanfraechem, D Bolívar and I Aertsen (eds), Victims and Restorative Justice, Routledge, 153–71
   Google Scholar
• Vanfraechem I and Aertsen I (2010) ‘Emprical Research on Restorative Justice in Europe: Perspectives’ in I Vanfraechem, I Aertsen and J Willemsens (eds), Restorative Justice Realities: Empirical Research in a European Context, Eleven International Publishing, 267–78
   Google Scholar
• Wagland P, Blanch B and Moore E (2013) ‘Participant Satisfaction with Youth Justice Conferencing’, Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice 170, 1–15
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave L (2011) ‘Investigating the Potentials of Restorative Justice Practice’, Journal of Law & Policy 36(1), 91–139
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave L (2012) ‘The Need for Clarity about Restorative Justice Conferences’ in E Zinsstag and I Vangraechem (eds), Conferencing and Restorative Justice: International Practices and Perspectives, Oxford University Press, 33–46
   Google Scholar
• Wallis P (2014) Understanding Restorative Justice: How Empathy Can Close the Gap Created by Crime, Policy Press
   Google Scholar
• Walters MA (2014) Hate Crime and Restorative Justice: Exploring Causes, Repairing Harms, Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Zehr H (1990) Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice, Herald Press
   Google Scholar
• Zernova M (2007) Restorative Justice: Ideals and Realities, Ashgate Publishing
   Google Scholar