Youth Justice, Restorative Justice and Gendered Violence — Oh My! The Rise and Rise of Offender ‘Accountability’ in Contemporary Penality

References

• American Probation and Parole Association 2009, Fact sheet 5: promising victim related practices in probation and parole, US Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, L, Sar, B & Barbee, A 2006, ‘Impact of coordinated response to intimate partner violence on offender accountability’, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 109–29.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J 2006, ‘Accountability and responsibility through restorative justice’ in M Dowdle (ed.), Rethinking public accountability: designs, dilemmas and experiences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J & Roche, D 2000, ‘Responsibility and restorative justice’ in M Schiff and G Bazemore (eds.), Restorative community justice: repairing harm and transforming communities, Anderson Publishing Co, Cincinnati, pp. 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, A & Pelech, W 2010, ‘Responding to young people responsible for harm: a comparative study of restorative and conventional approaches’, Contemporary Justice Review, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 287–306.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, D, Lucas, D & Justo, D 2009, ‘Have male offenders changed? Women's experiences of safety and accountability at the end of the program’ in A Day, P O'Leary, D Chung and D Justo (eds.), Domestic violence: working with men, Federation Press, Annandale, pp. 202–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cunneen, C, White, R & Richards, K 2015, Juvenile justice: youth and crime in Australia, 5th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A, O'Leary, P, Foster, G, Bahnisch, L & Gerace, A 2009, ‘Have male offenders changed? Men's perspectives and experiences at the end of the program’ in A Day, P O'Leary, D Chung and D Justo (eds.), Domestic violence: working with men, Federation Press, Annandale, pp. 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, K 2010, ‘Second chances: a comparison of civic engagement in offender reentry programs’, Criminal Justice Review, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 335–53.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, P 2007, ‘Youth justice, social exclusion and the demise of social justice’, The Howard Journal vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 401–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I 1995, Rewriting the soul: multiple personality and the sciences of memory, Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, J 2012, ‘“But she's violent, too!”: holding domestic violence offenders accountable within a systematic approach to batterer intervention’, Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 124–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hogeveen, B 2005, ‘“If we are tough on crime, if we punish crime, then people get the message”: constructing and governing the punishable young offender in Canada during the late 1990s’, Punishment and Society, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaggs, T, Leahy, F, Soboleva, N & Ong, S 2008, The Waitakere and Manukau family violence courts: an evaluation summary, Ministry of Justice, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Kole, T 2001, ‘Juvenile Offenders (Violent and Repeat Offender Accountability and Rehabilitation Act of 1999)’, Harvard Journal on Legislation, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 231–47.
   Google Scholar
• Koss, M, Bachar, K, Quince Hopkins, C & Carlson, C 2004, ‘Expanding a community's justice response to sex crimes through advocacy, prosecutorial, and public health collaboration: introducing the RESTORE program’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1435–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labriola, M 2007, Process evaluation of the Bronx Juvenile Accountability Court, Centre for Court Innovation, viewed 5 September 2017, www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/JAC_process_evaluation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J 2011, ‘“But I didn't do it!”: ethical treatment of sex offenders in denial’, Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 346–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, E 2003, ‘Public lecture: reason and emotion in restorative justice’, July 2000, Victoria University of Wellington, viewed 5 September 2017, http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/GE0007/S00014.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, A 2004, Youth accountability boards: how prosecutors are engaging communities to respond to low-level juvenile offending, Centre for Court Innovation.
   Google Scholar
• Marinos, V & Innocenti, N 2008, ‘Factors influencing police attitudes towards extrajudicial measures under the Youth Criminal Justice Act’, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, vol. 50, no. 4, 469–89.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S, Gregory, C & Iovanni, L 2005, ‘One size fits all? A gender-neutral approach to a gender-specific problem: contrasting batterer treatment programs for male and female offenders’, Criminal Justice Policy Review, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 336–59.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K 2011, The potential of Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) to reduce child sexual abuse in Australia, Winston Churchill Memorial Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Roche, D 2003, Accountability in restorative justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A & Wright, R 2004, ‘Understanding denial in sexual offenders: a review of cognitive and motivational processes to avoid responsibility’, Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Slowikowski, J 2009, ‘Juvenile accountability block grants program’, October 2009, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, viewed 5 September 2017, https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/226357.pdf, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, T, Thompson, D & Karstedt, S 2014, Assessing the impact of Circles of Support and Accountability on the reintegration of adults convicted of sexual offences in the community: final report, Centre for Criminal Justice Studies, University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Title, B, Carasso, M & Seidler, M 2002, ‘The Longmont community justice partnership: restorative justice practice as collaboration’, Contemporary Justice Review, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 273–84.
   Google Scholar
• Umbreit, M 1995, ‘Holding juvenile offenders accountable: a restorative justice perspective’, Juvenile and Family Court Journal, vol. 46, pp. 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, G & Kupchik, A 2009, ‘Accountable to what? Professional orientations towards accountability-based juvenile justice’, Punishment and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 85–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, J & Fraser, L 2009, Te Hurihanga pilot: evaluation report, Ministry of Justice, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Washington House Republicans 2013, Shea seeks to tighten electronic home monitoring notification requirements and hold offenders accountable, Washington House Republicans.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R, McWhinnie, A & Wilson, C 2008, ‘Circles of support and accountability: an international partnership in reducing sexual offender recidivism’, Prison Service Journal, vol. 178, pp. 26–36.
   Google Scholar
• Winder, B & Gough, B 2010, ‘“I never touched anybody — that's my defence”: a qualitative analysis of internet sex offender accounts’, Journal of Sexual Aggression, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 125–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehr, H 1990, Changing lenses: a new focus for crime and justice, Herald Press, Scottsdale.
   Google Scholar