Unfitness to stand trial and the social model of disability: challenges for Latin American criminal justice

References

• Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 319(25), 1635–1638. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198812223192504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, B. A., & Stein, M. A. (2023). The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, neuroscience, and criminal legal capacity. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 10(1), https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beail, N. (2002). Interrogative suggestibility, memory and intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 15(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2002.00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T., & Childress, J. (1999). Principles of biomedical ethics. Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Beltrani, A., & Zapf, P. A. (2020). Competence to stand trial and criminalization: An overview of the research. CNS Spectrums, 25(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852919001597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini, L., Mercurio, E., & Sheinbaum, D. (2018). Los retos en el acceso de las personas con discapacidad intelectual y psicosocial en el ámbito penal. Estudio comparativo de México y Buenos Aires [Challenges in the access of people with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities in the criminal field. A comparative study of Mexico and Buenos Aires]. Revista Latinoamericana en Discapacidad, Sociedad y Derechos Humanos, 2(2), 51–73. http://redcdpd.net/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/109.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnie, R. J. (1992). The competence of criminal defendants: A theoretical reformulation. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 10(3), 291–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370100303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, K. (2009). The Bradley Report. Lord Bradley’s review of people with mental health problems or learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. https://lx.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/resources/The%20Bradley%20report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bregaglio Lazarte, R., & Rodriguez Vásquez, J. (2017). Modelo social de la discapacidad y derecho penal: Aproximaciones al ordenamiento jurídico peruano [Social model of disability and criminal law: Approaches to the Peruvian legal system]. In Inimputabilidad y medidas de seguridad a debate: Reflexiones desde América latina en torno a los derechos de las personas con discapacidad [Debating inimputabilidad and security measures: Reflections from Latin America about the rights of persons with disabilities] (pp. 119–169). Documenta, Análisis y acción para la justicia social Ubijus.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, A. (2006). Competency to stand trial and the seriousness of the charge. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 34(4), 458–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgueño, P. A. (2021). Evaluación de la capacidad para estar en juicio y el uso de técnicas de información y comunicación remotas en la Justicia argentina [Assessment of competency to stand trial and the use of remote information and communication techniques in the Argentine Justice system]. Vertex Revista Argentina de Psiquiatría, 32(152, abr.-jun.), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.53680/vertex.v32i152.51
   Google Scholar
• Castex, M. (2007). Capacidad para estar en juicio [Capacity to stand trial]. Ad Hoc.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2013). Concluding observations on Australia's initial report, CRPD/C/AUS/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014a). Communication No. 8/12, CRPD/C/11/D/8/2012.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2014b). General Comment No. 1. CRPD/C/GC/1.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2015). Guidelines on article 14 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. The right to liberty and security of persons with disabilities. Adopted during the Committee’s 14th session, held in September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. (2019). Views adopted by the Committee under article 5 of the Optional Protocol in respect of communication 32/2015, CRPD/C/22/D/32/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Daray, R. (2019). Código Procesal Penal Federal. Análisis doctrinal y jurisprudencial [Federal Criminal Procedural Code. Doctrinal and jurisprudencial analysis] (Vol. 1). Hammurabi.
   Google Scholar
• Drope v. Missouri. (1975). 420 U.S. 162.
   Google Scholar
• Dusky v. U.S. (1960). 362 U.S. 402.
   Google Scholar
• Endara Rosales, J. (2021). La Facilitación del acceso a la Justicia. Una aproximación cualitativa a las barreras que enfrenta, las labores que realiza y los efectos que genera en el proceso judicial [Facilitation of access to Justice. A qualitative approach to the barriers it faces, the tasks it performs and the effects it generates in the judicial process]. Plena Inclusión.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Code Criminal Procedure. (2019). [Código Procesal Penal Federal] Decreto 118/2019. https://servicios.infoleg.gob.ar/infolegInternet/anexos/315000-319999/319681/norma.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Folino, J., Castillo, J., & Roesch, R. (2001). Evaluación de capacidad para actuar en proceso penal en Argentina y adaptación de la escala canadiense Fitness Interview Test, Revised edition [Assessment of ability to act in criminal proceedings in Argentina and adaptation of the Canadian Fitness Interview Test scale, Revised edition]. Medicina Forense Argentina-Boletín de la Asociación de Médicos Forenses de la República Argentina, 48, 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• García Garduza, I. (2015). “Apto para declarar”: ¿diagnóstico psiquiátrico o médico-forense [fitness to declare: Psychiatric or forensic medical diagnosis?]. Rev. Fac. Med. (Méx.), 58(2), 5–16. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0026-17422015000200005&lng=es&tlng=es
   Google Scholar
• Gaceta del Senado. (2023). Expedición del Código Nacional de Procedimientos Civiles y Familiares. https://www.senado.gob.mx/65/gaceta_del_senado/documento/122460.
   Google Scholar
• García, J. C., López, M. D. C. C. V. M., & González, A. S. S. (2020). Los derechos humanos de las personas con discapacidad mental en el sistema de justicia penal mexicano [The human rights of persons with mental disabilities in the Mexican criminal justice system]. Revista Latinoamericana en Discapacidad, Sociedad y Derechos Humanos, 4(2), 186–199.
   Google Scholar
• Glancy, G. D., Ash, P., Bath, E. P., Buchanan, A., Fedoroff, P., Frierson, R. L., Harris, V. L., Hatters Friedman, S. J., Hauser, M. J., Knoll, J., Norko, M., Pinals, D., Price, M., Recupero, P., Scott, C. L., & Zonana, H. V. (2015). AAPL practice guideline for the forensic assessment. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 43(2 Suppl), S3–S53. http://jaapl.org/content/43/2_Supplement/S3.long.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Godinez v. Moran. (1993). 509 U. S. 389.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. (2007). Offenders with learning disabilities. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(3), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00465.x
   Google Scholar
• Hegglin, F. (2013). Procedural capacity to stand trial, the right of defence and security measures []. Revista de Derecho Penal, 2(5), 191.
   Google Scholar
• Hegglin, F., & Mercurio, E. (2023). Acceso a la justicia de las personas con discapacidad intelectual. La declaración de inimputabilidad y la participación en el proceso desde el paradigma de la Convención sobre los derechos de las personas con discapacidad [Access to justice for people with intellectual disabilities. The declaration of inimputabilidad and participation in the process from the paradigm of the Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities]. Revista de las Defensorías Públicas del MERCOSUR, 10, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hegglin, M. F. (2016). La capacidad procesal para estar en juicio, el derecho de defensa y las medidas de seguridad. La inconstitucionalidad de las medidas de seguridad impuestas como consecuencia de la suspensión del proceso penal por discapacidad psicosocial del imputado. El caso del señor Acosta [The unconstitutionality of security measures imposed as a consequence of the suspension of criminal proceedings due to psychosocial disability of the accused. The case of Mr. Acosta]. Revista del Ministerio Público de la Defensa, 11(23–49), 23–52.
   Google Scholar
• Hegglin, M. F. (2017). Las medidas de seguridad en el sistema penal argentino: su contradicción con principios fundamentales del Derecho Penal y de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad [Security measures in the Argentine penal system: their contradiction with fundamental principles of Criminal Law and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities]. In Documenta, Análisis y acción para la justicia social, Inimputabilidad y medidas de seguridad a debate: Reflexiones desde América latina en torno a los derechos de las personas con discapacidad [Debate on Inimputabilidad and security measures: Reflections from Latin America around the rights of persons with disabilities] (pp. 15–52). Ciudad de México.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council. (2009). Thematic study prepared by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to enhance awareness and understanding of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. A/HRC/10/48.
   Google Scholar
• La Rosa, M., & Romero Villanueva, H. (2019). Commented Federal Criminal Procedural Code [Código Procesal Penal Federal Comentado] (Vol. 1). La Ley.
   Google Scholar
• Law 1996. (2019). Law establishing the regime for the exercise of the legal capacity of persons with disabilities of legal age, sanctioned in Colombia on 26 August 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Law 21.331. (2021). Law that establishes the Recognition and Protection of the Rights of Persons in Mental Health Care, published in Chile on May 11, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Law 26.994. (2014). Código Civil y Comercial de la Nación Argentina [Argentinian Civil and Comercial Code] enacted in Argentina on 7 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Law 9379. (2016). Law for the promotion of the personal autonomy of persons with disabilities, sanctioned in Costa Rica on 18 August 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Decree 1384. (2018). Legislative Decree that recognizes and regulates the legal capacity of persons with disabilities under equal conditions, sanctioned in Peru on September 4, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lizama, V. and Sheinbaum, D. (2020). Hacia un sistema de justicia incluyente: ajustes de procedimiento para personas con discapacidad intelectual y psicosocial [Towards an inclusive justice system: Procedural adjustments for people with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities]. In N. Martínez (Ed.), Forensic mental health (pp. 423-443). Tirant lo Blanch
   Google Scholar
• Math, S. B., Murthy, P., Parthasarthy, R., Kumar, C. N., & Madhusudhan, S. (2011). Chapter 11. Fitness To stand trial. In S.B. Math, P. Murthy, R. Parthasarthy, C. N. Kumar, & S. Madhusudhan (Eds.), Minds imprisoned: Mental health care in prisons (pp. 162–177). National institute of mental health Neuro Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. M. (2018). The insanity defence, indefinite detention and the UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Dublin ULJ, 41, 143–175.
   Google Scholar
• Mercurio, E. (2021a). “Cuál es el futuro de la inimputabilidad? Entre las neurociencias y la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad [What is the future of not guilty by insanity? Between neurosciences and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities].” Dissertation on 27 August, International Forum on Neuroscience and Law, organized by the National Institute of Penal Sciences of Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Mercurio, E. (2021b). Dificultades para la detección de personas con discapacidad intelectual y psicosocial detenidas por la policía en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires [Difficulties in the detection of people with intellectual and psychosocial disabilities detained by the police in the City of Buenos Aires]. Revista Española de Discapacidad, 9(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.5569/2340-5104.09.01.06
   Google Scholar
• Mercurio, E. (2023). Where is the insanity defense going? Between neuroscience and the social model of disability. Revista de Derecho, 36(1), 285–306. https://www.revistaderechovaldivia.cl/index.php/revde/article/view/1748.
   Google Scholar
• Minkowitz, T. (2014). Rethinking criminal responsibility from a critical disability perspective: The abolition of insanity/incapacity acquittals and unfitness to plead, and beyond. Griffith Law Review, 23(3), 434–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2014.1013177
   Google Scholar
• Mogavero, M. C. (2020). An exploratory examination of intellectual disability and mental illness associated with alleged false confessions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(4), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman, D., Noffsinger, S. G., Ash, P., Frierson, R. L., Gerbasi, J., Hackett, M., Lewis, C. F., Pinals, D. A., Scott, C. L., Sieg, K. G., Wal, B. W., & Zonana, H. V. (2007). AAPL practice guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 35(Supplement 4), S3–S72. http://jaapl.org/content/35/Supplement_4/S3.long.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Code of Criminal Procedures of the United Mexican States. (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Special Rapporteur on the rights of persons with disabilities, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Special Envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General on Disability and Accessibility. (2020). International principles and guidelines on access to justice for persons with disabilities. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios, A. (2008). El modelo social de discapacidad: orígenes, caracterización y plasmación en la Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad [The social model of disability: origin, characterization and embodiment in the International Convention for rights of persons with disabilities]. Cermi.
   Google Scholar
• Plena Inclusión. (2018). Acceso a la justicia: ajustes de procedimientos para personas con discapacidad intelectual y del desarrollo [Access to justice: Procedural adjustments for persons with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities]. Plena Inclusión. https://www.plenainclusion.org/publicaciones/buscador/acceso-a-la-justicia-ajustes-de-procedimiento-para-personas-con-discapacidad-intelecual-o-del-desarrollo/.
   Google Scholar
• Plena Inclusión. (2020). El facilitador en el proceso judicial [The facilitator in judicial processes] Plena Inclusión. https://www.plenainclusion.org/publicaciones/buscador/la-persona-facilitadora-en-procesos-judiciales/.
   Google Scholar
• Pravia, A. (2019). Código Procesal Penal Federal. Ley 27.063 con la actualización de la ley 27.482 Comentado y Concordado [Commented Federal Criminal Procedural Code, Law 27.063 with the update of the law 27.482].
   Google Scholar
• Recover, T., & Araoz, I. (2014). Las personas con discapacidad intelectual o del desarrollo ante el proceso penal. Análisis sobre la intervención de la persona con discapacidad intelectual o del desarrollo en el proceso penal y el cumplimiento de condenas y medidas de privación de libertad derivadas de éste [People with intellectual or developmental disabilities in criminal proceedings. Analysis on the intervention of the person with intellectual or developmental disabilities in the criminal process and the fulfillment of sentences and measures of deprivation of liberty derived from it]. FEAPS.
   Google Scholar
• Roesch, R., Zapf, P., Eaves, D., & Webster, C. (1998). Fitness Interview Test (Revised edition), The Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canadá.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C. E., & Sewell, K. W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial-revised (ECST R). Psyhological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Roytman, E. (2020). Kahler v. Kansas: The end of the insanity defense? Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy Sidebar, 15, 43–58. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/djclpp_sidebar/184.
   Google Scholar
• Sheinbaum, D., & Vera, S. (2016). Hacia un sistema de justicia incluyente: proceso penal y discapacidad psicosocial [Towards an inclusive justice system: Criminal process and psychosocial disability.] Documenta. Análisis y Acción para la Justicia Social.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, D., & Miotto, N. (2010). Capacidad Psicofísica para estar en Juicio: “Incapacidad Sobreviniente”: Prisión domiciliaria [Psychophysical capacity to stand trial: “surviving incapacity”: home imprisonment]. Cuadernos de Medicina Forense, 77–82.
   Google Scholar
• Slobogin, C. (2000). An end to insanity: Recasting the role of mental disability in criminal cases. Virginia Law Review, 1199–1247. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobogin, C. (2015). Eliminating Mental Disability as a Legal Criterion in Deprivation of Liberty Cases: The Impact of the Convention on tohe Rights of Persons with Disability on the Insanity Defense, Civil Commitment, and Competency Law. Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.04.011
   Google Scholar
• Talbot, J. (2011). Prisoners with learning disabilities and learning difficulties. Prison Service Journal, 195, 29–35. https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/publications/psj/prison-service-journal-195.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, adopted 13 December 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Valenzuela Toro, A. M., & Viglino, M. (2021). How Latin American researchers suffer in science. Nature, 598, 374–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02601-8.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson v. U.S. (D.C. Cir. 1968). 391 F.2d 460.
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, P. A., Roesch, R., & Pirelli, G. (2013). Assessing competency to stand trial. In I. Weiner & R. Otto (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 281–314). Wiley.
   Google Scholar