Who’s watching Mr Big? Scenario operations and induced confessions

References

• Australian Law Reform Commission Report 102. (2006). Uniform Evidence Law.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Law Reform Commission Report 26. (1985). Evidence (Interim).
   Google Scholar
• Bronitt, S. (2004). The law in undercover policing: A comparative study of entrapment and covert interviewing in Australia, Canada and Europe. Common Law World Review, 33(1), 35–80. https://doi.org/10.1350/clwr.33.1.35.25831
   Google Scholar
• Connors, C. J., Archibald, N., Smith, S. M., & Patry, M. W. (2017). Shocking the conscience: Public responses to police use of the “Mr. Big” technique. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, 17(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2017.1237260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connors, C. J., Patry, M. W., & Smith, S. M. (2019). The Mr. Big technique on trial by jury. Psychology, Crime & Law, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1483507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Controlled Operations Committee Queensland. (2022). Twenty-second annual report. Brisbane. https://documents.parliament.qld.gov.au/tp/2022/5722T1780-CCC0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Croucher, J. S., & Hon, S. (2022). Judge or jury? A legal conundrum. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(1), 83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufraimont, L. (2015). Hart and Mack: New restraints on Mr. Big and a new approach to unreliable prosecution evidence. In The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, B. L. (2009). The substance of false confessions. Stanford Law Review, 62, 1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazebrook, S. (2015). Mr Big operations: Innovative investigative technique or threat to justice? In Speech Given by the Honourable Justice Dame Susan Glazebrook at the Judicial Colloquium. Retrieved September.
   Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P., & Urbas, G. (2019). Online undercover investigations and the role of private third parties. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 13(1), 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Harfield, C. (2010). The governance of covert investigation. Melbourne University Law Review, 34(3), 773–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iftene, A. (2019). Mr. Big: The undercover breach of the right against self-incrimination.
   Google Scholar
• Iftene, A., & Kinnear, V. L. (2020). Mr. Big and the new common law confessions rule: Five years in review. Manitoba Law Journal, 43, 295.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on the National Crime Authority. (1999). Street legal: The involvement of the National Crime Authority in controlled operations.
   Google Scholar
• Koningisor, C. (2023). Police secrecy exceptionalism. Columbia Law Review, 123(3), 615–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk, D., & Sharps, M. J. (2017). Consequences of undercover operations in law enforcement: A review of challenges and best practices. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32(3), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9211-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackey, J. (2020). False confessions and testimonial injustice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 110, 43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, B. (2019). Normalizing covert surveillance: The subterranean world of policing. The British Journal of Sociology, 70(5), 2070–2091. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, B., Goold, B., & Giollabhui, S. M. (2016). From a visible spectacle to an invisible presence: The working culture of covert policing. British Journal of Criminology, 56(4), 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutes, C. (2020). Hart failure: Assessing the Mr. Big confessions framework five years later. Manitoba Law Journal, 43, 209.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, K., & Snook, B. (2016). Putting the Mr. Big technique back on trial: A re-examination of probative value and abuse of process through a scientific lens. Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(2), 131–142.
   Google Scholar
• MacLean, J., & Chapman, F. (2016). Au revoir, monsieur big? Confessions, coercion, and the courts. Criminal Reports, 23(2), 1–15. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2710010
   Google Scholar
• Moore, T. E., Copeland, P., & Schuller, R. A. (2009). Deceit, betrayal and the search for truth: Legal and psychological perspectives on the Mr. Big strategy. Criminal Law Quarterly, 55, 348.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, B. (2014). Retrospective on ridgeway: Governing principles of controlled operations. Criminal Law Journal, 38(1), 38–58.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, B., & Anderson, J. (2016). Confessions to Mr Big: A new rule of evidence? The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 20(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712715613485
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Inspector of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission. (May 2022). Special report on an audit of the Law Enforcement Conduct Commission’s acquisition and use of assumed identities and other matters related to the system of oversight of covert investigative powers in NSW – May 2022. Sydney. https://www.oilecc.nsw.gov.au/assets/oilecc/reports/special-reports/Special-Report-Office-of-the-Inspector-of-the-Law-Enforcement-Conduct-Commission-May-2022.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Otgaar, H., Schell-Leugers, J. M., Howe, M. L., De La Fuente Vilar, A., Houben, S. T. L., & Merckelbach, H. (2021). The link between suggestibility, compliance, and false confessions: A review using experimental and field studies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, A. (2005). Applying Swaffield part II: Fake gangs and induced confessions. Criminal Law Journal, 29(2), 111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Phelan, N. (2019). Importing a Canadian creation: A comparative analysis of evidentiary rules governing the admissibility of confessions to Mr. Big. Manitoba Law Journal, 42, 385.
   Google Scholar
• Puddister, K., & Riddell, T. (2012). The RCMP’s “Mr. Big” sting operation: A case study in police independence, accountability and oversight. Canadian Public Administration, 55(3), 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2012.00229.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, J. E. (2007). The place of covert surveillance in democratic societies: A comparative study of the United States and Germany. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 55(3), 493–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/55.3.493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Commission into the Management of Police Informants. (2020). Final report, November 2020. Victorian Government Printer.
   Google Scholar
• Ruyters, M., Stratton, G., & Bartle, J. (2021). The culture of non-disclosure and miscarriages of justice. Alternative Law Journal, 46(4), 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20987009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, A. (2021). Peer to peer: Covid-19 and transforming jury trials in Australia. Australian Quarterly, 92(4), 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, G. (2019). The difference between ss 84 and 85 of the Uniform Evidence Acts. Australian Law Journal, 93(1), 53–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitbourn, M. (2023). Police find more than 500 hours of missing Folbigg tapes. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/police-find-more-than-500-hours-of-missing-folbigg-tapes-20230224-p5cn9u.html.
   Google Scholar